References
- Boltzmann, L. 1905. “The Relations of Applied Mathematics.” In Proceedings of the International Congress of Arts and Science, 1905, 591–603. London: University Alliance.
- Brenner, A. 2003. Les Origines françaises de la philosophie des sciences. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Comte, A. 1830–1842. Cours de philosophie positive. Paris: Bachelier.
- de Paz, M. 2014. “The Third Way Epistemology: A Re-characterization of Poincaré’s Conventionalism.” In Poincaré, Philosopher of Science: Problems and Perspectives, edited by M. de Paz and R. DiSalle, 47–65. New York: Springer.
- Duhem, P. [1905] 1992. L’Évolution de la mécanique. Paris: Vrin.
- Duhem, P. [1906] 1989. La Théorie physique. Son objet—sa structure. Paris: Vrin.
- Friedman, M. 1996. “Poincaré’s Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists.” In Henri Poincaré: science et philosophie, edited by J. Greffe, G. Heinzmann, and K. Lorenz, 333–344. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
- Giedymin, J. 1982. Science and Convention: Essays on Henri Poincaré’s Philosophy of Science and the Conventionalist Tradition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Heinzmann, G. 2009. “Hypotheses and Conventions in Poincaré.” In The Significance of the Hypothetical in the Natural Sciences, edited by M. Heidelberger and G. Schiemann, 169–192. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Heinzmann, G. 2010. “Conventions in Geometry and Pragmatic Reconstruction in Poincaré: A Problematic Reception in Logical Empiricism.” https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00529135/document.
- Helmholtz, H. [1862] 1995. “On the Relation of Natural Science to Science in General.” In H. Helmholtz, Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, edited by D. Cahan, 76–95. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Kant, I. [1787] 1929. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N. Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan.
- Ly, I. 2008. “Mathématique et physique dans l’oeuvre philosophique de Poincaré.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Université Nancy 2.
- Mach, E. [1905] 1976. Knowledge and Error. Translated by T. J. McCormack and P. Foulkes. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
- Mill, J. S. [1843] 1974. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Poincaré, H. 1891. “Les géométries non euclidiennes.” Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées 2: 769–774.
- Poincaré, H. 1900. “Les relations entre la physique expérimentale et la physique mathématique.” Rapports présentés au Congrès International de Physique de 1900 1: 1–29.
- Poincaré, H. [1902] 1968. La Science et l’hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.
- Poincaré, H. [1905] 1970. La Valeur de la science. Paris: Flammarion.
- Poincaré, H. [1908] 1999. Science et méthode. In Philosophia Scientiae 1998–1999 Cahier Spécial 3. Paris: Kimé.
- Poincaré, H. 1913. Dernières pensées. Paris: Flammarion.
- Walter, S. 2009. “Hypothesis and Convention in Poincaré’s Defense of Galilei Spacetime.” In The Significance of the Hypothetical in the Physical Sciences, edited by M. Heidelberger and G. Schiemann, 193–219. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Walter, S. 2010. “L’hypothèse naturelle, ou quatre jours dans la vie de Gerhard Heinzmann.” In Construction: Festschrift for Gerhard Heinzmann, edited by P. E. Bour, M. Rebuschi, and L. Rollet, 129–135. London: College Publications.
- Zahar, E. 2001. Poincaré’s Philosophy: From Conventionalism to Phenomenology. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112441/MPU-humanities-jenniai.png"})