659
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Explaining with Models: The Role of Idealizations

References

  • Bokulich, A. 2009. “Explanatory Fictions.” In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, edited by M. Suárez, 91–109. London: Routledge.
  • Bokulich, A. 2011. “How Scientific Models Can Explain.” Synthese 180: 33–45. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9565-1
  • Dilworth, C., ed. 1992. Idealization IV: Intelligibility in Science. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Elgin, C. Z. 2007. “Understanding and the Facts.” Philosophical Studies 132: 33–42. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9054-z
  • Elgin, C. Z. 2009. “Telling Instances.” In Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, edited by R. Frigg and M. Hunter, 1–18. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Elgin, M., and E. Sober. 2002. “Cartwright on Explanation and Idealization.” Erkenntnis 57: 441–450. doi: 10.1023/A:1021502932490
  • Forster, M. R. 2001. “The New Science of Simplicity.” In Simplicity, Inference and Modelling, edited by A. Zellner, H. A. Keuzenkamp, and M. McAleer, 83–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Giere, R. N. 2010. “An Agent-based Conception of Models and Scientific Representation.” Synthese 172: 269–281. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9506-z
  • Hartmann, S. 1998. “Idealization in Quantum Field Theory.” In Idealization in Contemporary Physics, edited by N. Shanks, 99–122. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Hempel, C. G. 1965. “Aspects of Scientific Explanation.” In C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 331–496. New York: Free Press.
  • Jones, M. R. 2005. “Idealization and Abstraction: A Framework.” In Idealization XII: Correcting the Model. Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences, edited by M. R. Jones and N. Cartwright, 173–217. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Kennedy, A. G. 2012. “A Non Representationalist View of Model Explanation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 326–332. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.029
  • Knuuttila, T. 2011. “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-based Representation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034
  • Knuuttila, T., and M. Merz. 2009. “Understanding by Modeling: An Objectual Approach.” In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, and K. Eigner, 146–168. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Laymon, R. 1987. “Using Scott Domains to Explicate the Notions of Approximate and Idealized Data.” Philosophy of Science 54: 194–221. doi: 10.1086/289370
  • Laymon, R. 1995. “Experimentation and the Legitimacy of Idealization.” Philosophical Studies 77: 353–375. doi: 10.1007/BF00989579
  • Lehtinen, A. 2013. “Three Kinds of ‘As-if’ Claims.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20: 184–205. doi: 10.1080/1350178X.2013.801560
  • Lehtinen, A., and J. Kuorikoski. 2007. “Unrealistic Assumptions in Rational Choice Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37: 115–138. doi: 10.1177/0048393107299684
  • Lenhard, J., and E. Winsberg. 2010. “Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41: 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001
  • Lipton, P. 1991. “Contrastive Explanation and Causal Triangulation.” Philosophy of Science 58: 687–697. doi: 10.1086/289648
  • Mäki, U. 2009. “Missing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.” Erkenntnis 70: 29–43. doi: 10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9
  • McMullin, E. 1978. “Structural Explanation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 139–147.
  • McMullin, E. 1985. “Galilean Idealization.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16: 247–273. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2
  • Morrison, M. 2005. “Approximating the Real: The Role of Idealizations in Physical Theory.” In Idealization XII: Correcting the Model. Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences, edited by M. R. Jones and N. Cartwright, 145–171. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Morrison, M. 2009. “Understanding in Physics and Biology: From the Abstract to the Concrete.” In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, and K. Eigner, 123–145. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Nowak, L. 1992. “The Idealizational Approach to Science: A Survey.” In Idealization III: Approximation and Truth, edited by J. Brzeziński and L. Nowak, 9–63. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Puchwein, E., J. S. Bolton, M. G. Haehnelt, P. Madau, G. D. Becker, and F. Haardt. 2015. “The Photoheating of the Intergalactic Medium in Synthesis Models of the UV Background.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450: 4081–4097. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv773
  • Strevens, M. 2008. Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Suárez, M. 2009. “Scientific Fictions as Rules of Inference.” In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, edited by M. Suárez, 158–178. London: Routledge.
  • Suárez, M. 2010. “Fictions, Inference and Realism.” In Fictions and Models: New Essays, edited by J. Woods, 225–245. Munich: Philosophia.
  • Suárez, M. 2015. “Deflationary Representation, Inference, and Practice.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 49: 36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.11.001
  • Teller, P. 2001. “Twilight of the Perfect Model Model.” Erkenntnis 55: 393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1013349314515
  • van Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • van Fraassen, B. C. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Vorms, M. 2011. “Representing with Imaginary Models: Formats Matter.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.036
  • Weisberg, M. 2007. “Three Kinds of Idealization.” Journal of Philosophy 104: 639–659. doi: 10.5840/jphil20071041240
  • Winsberg, E. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.