Economics Imperialism and Epistemic Cosmopolitanism

References

• Andersen, Hanne, and Susann Wagenknecht. 2013. “Epistemic Dependence in Interdisciplinary Groups.” Synthese 190: 1881–1898. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0172-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 1995. “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 23: 7–58. doi: 10.5840/philtopics199523213
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2004. “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce.” Hypatia 19: 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2011. “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessment of Scientific Testimony.” Episteme 8: 144–164. doi: 10.3366/epi.2011.0013
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217. doi: 10.1086/259394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Steve, and Adrian Walsh. 2009. “Scientific Imperialism and the Proper Relations between the Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 195–207. doi: 10.1080/02698590903007170
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Steve, and Adrian Walsh. 2013. “Imperialism, Progress, Developmental Teleology, and Interdisciplinary Unification.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 341–351. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.825493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudd, Ann E. 2005. “How to Explain Oppression: Criteria of Adequacy for Normative Explanatory Theories.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35: 20–49. doi: 10.1177/0048393104271923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudd, Ann E. 2006. Analyzing Oppression. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dupré, John. 1996. “Against Scientific Imperialism.” In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by David Hull, Micky Forbes, and Richard M. Burian, vol. 2, 374–381. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dupré, John. 2001. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Kevin. 2011. “Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 78: 303–324. doi: 10.1086/659222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, Kevin. 2013. “Douglas on Values: From Indirect Roles to Multiple Goals.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 375–383. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, Robert E. 1988. “What Is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?” Ethics 98: 663–686. doi: 10.1086/292998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1996. “The Disunities of the Sciences.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David J. Stump, 37–74. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, Stephen, Helen Longino, and Kenneth Waters, eds. 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2013. “Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 315–324. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.825494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1981. “Explanatory Unification.” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531. doi: 10.1086/289019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1989. “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World.” In Scientific Explanation, edited by Philip Kitcher and Wesley Salmon, 410–505. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1990. “The Division of Cognitive Labor.” Journal of Philosophy 87: 5–22. doi: 10.2307/2026796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” In Thomas S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 320–339. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuorikoski, Jaakko, and Aki Lehtinen. 2010. “Economics Imperialism and Solution Concepts in Political Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40: 347–374. doi: 10.1177/0048393109341452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, Edward P. 2000. “Economic Imperialism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 99–146. doi: 10.1162/003355300554683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 1995. “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues.” Synthese 104: 383–397. doi: 10.1007/BF01064506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2001. “Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31: 488–506. doi: 10.1177/004839310103100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2009. “Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39: 351–380. doi: 10.1177/0048393108319023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2013. “Scientific Imperialism: Difficulties in Definition, Identification, and Assessment.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 325–339. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.825496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali, and Caterina Marchionni. 2011. “Is Geographical Economics Imperializing Economic Geography?” Journal of Economic Geography 11: 645–665. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sappinen, Jorma. 2003. “Stretching the Scope of Economics: On the Nature and Impact of Gary S. Becker’s Economics Imperialism.” PhD diss., Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Miriam. 2001. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, George. 1984. “Economics—The Imperial Science?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 86: 301–313. doi: 10.2307/3439864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, Paul. 1999. How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Michael. 2001. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, James. 2014. “Scientific Explanation.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2014 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/scientific-explanation.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2005a. “Does Science Have a Moving Target?” American Philosophical Quarterly 42: 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2005b. “Rethinking Scientific Specialization.” Social Studies of Science 35: 151–164. doi: 10.1177/0306312705045811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2011. Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, Alison. 1999. “Rethinking Unity as a ‘Working Hypothesis’ for Philosophy of Science: How Archaeologists Exploit the Disunities of Science.” Perspectives on Science 7: 293–317. doi: 10.1162/posc.1999.7.3.293
   Google Scholar
• Zamora Bonilla, Jesús. 2012. “The Economics of Scientific Knowledge.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 13: Philosophy of Economics, edited by Uskali Mäki, 823–862. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar