Fundamentality, Effectiveness, and Objectivity of Gauge Symmetries

References

• Baker, David John. 2010. “Symmetry and the Metaphysics of Physics.” Philosophy Compass 5: 1157–1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00361.x
   Google Scholar
• Bangu, Sorin. 2008. “Reifying Mathematics? Prediction and Symmetry Classification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39: 239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangu, Sorin. 2013. “Symmetry.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, edited by Robert Batterman, 287–313. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli, Arianna. 2011. “Naturalness and the Hierarchy Problem in Historical-philosophical Perspective.” Unpublished lecture, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomley, James, and John Baez. 1996. “Why Are There Eight Gluons and Not Nine?” http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/gluons.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brading, Katherine, and Elena Castellani, eds. 2003. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brading, Katherine, and Elena Castellani. 2013. “Symmetry and Symmetry Breaking.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/symmetry-breaking.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, Otávio. 2011. “An Inferential Conception of the Application of Mathematics.” Noûs 45: 345–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00772.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Tian-Yu. 1988. “Gauge Theory and the Geometrization of Fundamental Physics.” In Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, edited by Harvey R. Brown and Rom Harré, 117–133. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani, Elena. 2002. “Reductionism, Emergence, and Effective Field Theories.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33: 251–267. doi: 10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani, Elena. 2003. “On the Meaning of Symmetry Breaking.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 321–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani, Elena, and Jenann Ismael. 2016. “Which Curie’s Principle?” Philosophy of Science 83: 1002–1013. doi: 10.1086/687933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cat, Jordi. 1998. “The Physicists’ Debates on Unification in Physics at the End of the 20th Century.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28: 253–299. doi: 10.2307/27757796
   Google Scholar
• Chadha, Sudhir, and Holger Bech Nielsen. 1983. “Lorentz Invariance as a Low Energy Phenomenon.” Nuclear Physics B 217: 125–144. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90081-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chkareuli, J. L., C. D. Froggatt, and H. B. Nielsen. 2011. “Spontaneously Generated Tensor Field Gravity.” Nuclear Physics B 848: 498–522. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham, W. Noel, and Derek A. Greenwood. 2007. An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curie, Pierre. 1894. “Sur la symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques, symétrie d'un champ électrique et d'un champ magnétique.” Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée 3 (1): 393–415. doi: 10.1051/jphystap:018940030039300
   Google Scholar
• Debs, Talal A., and Michael L. G. Redhead. 2009. Objectivity, Invariance, and Convention: Symmetry in Physical Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, David. 1986. “On Wheeler’s Notion of ‘Law without Law’ in Physics.” Foundations of Physics 16: 565–572. doi: 10.1007/BF01886521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, John. 2003. “Rough Guide to Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 335–346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Jared A., Yevgeny Kats, David Shih, and Matthew J. Strassler. 2014. “Toward Full LHC Coverage of Natural Supersymmetry.” Journal of High Energy Physics 7: 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Jonathan L. 2013. “Naturalness and the Status of Supersymmetry.” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 63: 351–382. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filomeno, Aldo. 2014. “On the Possibility of Stable Regularities Without Fundamental Laws.” PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbach, Ephraim, Daniel Sudarsky, Aaron Szafer, Carrick Talmadge, and S. H. Aronson. 1986. “Reanalysis of the Eötvös Experiment.” Physical Review Letters 56: 3–6. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowlie, Andrew. 2014. “CMSSM, Naturalness and the ‘Fine-tuning Price’ of the Very Large Hadron Collider.” Physical Review D 90: 015010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.015010
   Google Scholar
• French, Steven. 2010. “The Interdependence of Objects, Structure, and Dependence.” Synthese 175: 89–109. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9734-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, Steven. 2014. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, Steven, and James Ladyman. 2003. “Between Platonism and Phenomenalism: Reply to Cao.” Synthese 136: 73–78. doi: 10.1023/A:1024116502524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, Steven, and Kerry McKenzie. 2015. “Rethinking Outside the Toolbox: Reflecting Again on the Relationship Between Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics.” In Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, edited by Tomasz Bigaj and Christian Wüthrich, 25–54. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Friederich, Simon. 2013. “Gauge Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories—In Search of Clarification.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3: 157–182. doi: 10.1007/s13194-012-0061-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederich, Simon, Robert Harlander, and Koray Karaca. 2014. “Philosophical Perspectives on Ad Hoc Hypotheses and the Higgs Mechanism.” Synthese 191: 3897–3917. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0504-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froggatt, C. D., and H. B. Nielsen. 1991. Origin of Symmetries. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Froggatt, C. D., and H. B. Nielsen. 2002. “Derivation of Lorentz Invariance and Three Space Dimensions in Generic Field Theory.” https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0211106.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, David. 2008. Introduction to Elementary Particles. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics Without Numbers: Towards a Modal-structural Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ismael, Jenann. 1997. “Curie’s Principle.” Synthese 110: 167–190. doi: 10.1023/A:1004929109216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismael, Jenann, and Bas C. van Fraassen. 2003. “Symmetry as a Guide to Superfluous Theoretical Structure.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 371–392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Ted. 1995. “Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State.” Physical Review Letters 75: 1260–1263. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Ted, and Aron C. Wall. 2010. “Black Hole Thermodynamics and Lorentz Symmetry.” Foundations of Physics 40: 1076–1080. doi: 10.1007/s10701-010-9423-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantorovich, Aharon. 2003. “The Priority of Internal Symmetries in Particle Physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34: 651–675. doi: 10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00067-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantorovich, Aharon. 2009. “Ontic Structuralism and the Symmetries of Particle Physics.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40: 73–84. doi: 10.1007/s10838-009-9084-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Etienne, and Marc Lachièze-Rey. 1993. The Quest for Unity: The Adventure of Physics. Translated by Axel Reisinger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosso, Peter. 2000. “The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51: 81–98. doi: 10.1093/bjps/51.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosso, Peter. 2003. “Symmetry, Objectivity, and Design.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 413–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyman, James. 2014. “Structural Realism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/structural-realism.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyman, James, and Don Ross. 2009. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, Leon M., and Christopher T. Hill. 2004. Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lyre, Holger. 2004. “Holism and Structuralism in U(1) Gauge Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35: 643–670. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Christopher. 2003. “On Continuous Symmetries and the Foundations of Modern Physics.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 29–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maudlin, Tim. 1996. “On the Unification of Physics.” Journal of Philosophy 93: 129–144. doi: 10.2307/2940873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, Gordon. 2007. The Structure and Interpretation of the Standard Model. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Kerry. 2013. “In No Categorical Terms: A Sketch for an Alternative Route to Humeanism about Fundamental Laws.” In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Maria Carla Galavotti, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, and Marcel Weber, 45–61. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Kerry. 2014a. “On the Fundamentality of Symmetries.” Philosophy of Science 81: 1090–1102. doi: 10.1086/677697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Kerry. 2014b. “Priority and Particle Physics: Ontic Structural Realism as a Fundamentality Thesis.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65: 353–380. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axt017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganti, Matteo, and Tuomas E. Tahko. 2016. “Moderately Naturalistic Metaphysics.” Synthese, 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1068-2.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, Margaret. 1995. “The New Aspect: Symmetries as Meta-laws.” In Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, edited by Friedel Weinert, 157–190. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, Margaret. 2000. Unifying Scientific Theories: Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, Margaret. 2003. “Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking: Theoretical Arguments and Philosophical Problems.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 347–363. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, Margaret. 2013. “Unification in Physics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, edited by Robert Batterman, 381–415. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mukohyama, Shinji, and Jean-Philippe Uzan. 2013. “From Configuration to Dynamics: Emergence of Lorentz Signature in Classical Field Theory.” Physical Review D 87: 065020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.065020
   Google Scholar
• Nounou, Antigone M. 2015. “For or Against Structural Realism? A Verdict from High Energy Physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49: 84–101. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. 2001. Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles S. [1867] 1992. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1, 1867–1893. Edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pincock, Christopher. 2004. “A Revealing Flaw in Colyvan’s Indispensability Argument.” Philosophy of Science 71: 61–79. doi: 10.1086/381413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räz, Tim, and Tilman Sauer. 2015. “Outline of a Dynamical Inferential Conception of the Application of Mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49: 57–72. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redhead, M. L. G. 2003. “The Interpretation of Gauge Symmetry.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 124–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Andrew. 2002. Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics: The Philosophy of Chance, Law, and Evolution. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rickles, Dean, and Steven French. 2003. “Understanding Permutation Symmetry.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Katherine Brading and Elena Castellani, 212–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, John T. 2008. The Law-governed Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Matthew B., Karen R. Bland, Gerald B. Cleaver, and Jay R. Dittmann. 2008. “A Simple Introduction to Particle Physics. Part I: Foundations and the Standard Model.” http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3328.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Don, James Ladyman, and Harold Kincaid, eds. 2013. Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Stewart. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Barry. 1995. Representations of Finite and Compact Groups. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Strocchi, Franco. 2012. “Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Systems.” Scholarpedia 7 (1): 11,196. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.11196
   Google Scholar
• Tegmark, Max. 2014. Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, Roberto M., and Lee Smolin. 2014. The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinde, Erik P. 2011. “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2011: 1–27. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Steven. 1980. “Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions.” Reviews of Modern Physics 52: 515–523. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyl, Hermann. 1952. Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, John A. 1982. “Law Without Law.” In Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by Wojciech H. Zurek and John A. Wheeler, 182–213. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, John A. 1983. “On Recognizing ‘Law Without Law’.” American Journal of Physics 51: 398–404. doi: 10.1119/1.13224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigner, Eugene P. 1960. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13: 1–14. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160130102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigner, Eugene P. 1967. Symmetries and Reflections: Scientific Essays. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilczek, Frank. 2008. The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Porter. 2015. “Naturalness, the Autonomy of Scales, and the 125 GeV Higgs.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51: 82–96. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar