Was Feyerabend a Postmodernist?

References

• Ambrosio, Chiara. 2015. “Feyerabend for Art and Science.” Keynote address, conference Feyerabend 2015: Forty Years “Against Method”, Durham University, 16 July.
   Google Scholar
• Baghramian, Maria. 2004. Relativism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 1987. Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-modernity and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, Steven, and Douglas Kellner. 1997. The Postmodern Turn. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Matthew J. 2016. “The Abundant World: Paul Feyerabend’s Metaphysics of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57: 142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Hank. 2011. “Paul Feyerabend: ‘Science's Greatest Enemy’ Attacks from the Grave.” Science 2.0. http://www.science20.com.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Stephen R. L. 2002. “Feyerabend’s Conquest of Abundance.” Inquiry 45: 249–267. doi: 10.1080/002017402760093324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, David E. 1993. “Postmodernism and ‘The End of Philosophy’.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1: 49–59. doi: 10.1080/09672559308570761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, David E. 2008. “Postmodernism.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Education, edited by Randall Curren, 206–217. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Craig-Martin, Michael. 2015. On Being an Artist. London: Art Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crome, Keith, and James Williams, eds. 2006. The Lyotard Reader and Guide. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1998. “The Simulacrum and Ancient Philosophy.” In Postmodernism: Critical Concepts, edited by Victor E. Taylor and Charles E. Winquist, vol. 1, 128–151. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. [1967] 1976. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri C. Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. [1972] 1981. Positions. Translated by Alan Bass. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1998. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” In Postmodernism: Critical Concepts, edited by Victor E. Taylor and Charles E. Winquist, vol. 1, 504–520. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1968. “Science, Freedom, and the Good Life.” Philosophical Forum 1 (2): 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1970. “Philosophy of Science: A Subject with a Great Past.” In Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Science, edited by Roger H. Stuewer, 172–183. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1973. “Die Wissenschaftstheorie—eine bisher unbekannte Form des Irrsinnes?” In Natur und Geschichte. X. Deutscher Kongreß für Philosophie, Kiel 8.–12. Oktober 1972, edited by Kurt Hubner and Albert Menne, 88–124. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1975. “How to Defend Society against Science.” Radical Philosophy 11: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1976. “On the Critique of Scientific Reason.” In Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, edited by Robert S. Cohen, Paul K. Feyerabend, and Marx W. Wartofsky, 109–143. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1978. Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1987a. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1987b. “Creativity—A Dangerous Myth.” Critical Inquiry 13: 700–711. doi: 10.1086/448417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1993. Against Method. 3rd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1999. Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being . Edited by Bert Terpstra. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grebowicz, Margret. 2005. “Feyerabend’s Postmodernism.” Studies in Practical Philosophy 5 (1): 112–133. doi: 10.5840/studpracphil2005515
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Ursula K. 2004. “Science, Technology, and Postmodernism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism, edited by Steven Connor, 136–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Lisa. 2016. “Between Relativism and Pluralism: Philosophical and Political Relativism in Feyerabend’s Late Work.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57: 96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 2002. “Paul Feyerabend—ein postmoderner Philosoph? Ein Portrait.” Information Philosophie, März: 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2013a. “A Pluralist Challenge to ‘Integrative Medicine’: Feyerabend and Popper on the Cognitive Value of Alternative Medicine.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44: 392–400. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2013b. “Feyerabend on Science and Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 47: 407–422. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2016. “Why Did Feyerabend Defend Astrology? Integrity, Virtue, and the Authority of Science.” Social Epistemology 30: 464–482. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2015.1031851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2017. “Reawakening to Wonder: Wittgenstein, Feyerabend, and Scientism.” In Wittgenstein and Scientism, edited by Jonathan Beale and Ian James Kidd. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koertge, Noretta. 2000. “‘New Age’ Philosophies of Science: Constructivism, Feminism, and Postmodernism.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51: 667–683. doi: 10.1093/bjps/51.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusch, Martin. 2016. “Relativism in Feyerabend’s Later Writings.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57: 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248. doi: 10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 1997. “Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism.” Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S396–S407. doi: 10.1086/392617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Translated by Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphet, Julian. 2004. “Postmodernism and Space.” In The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism, edited by Steven Connor, 116–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Nancey. 1990. “Scientific Realism and Postmodern Philosophy.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41: 291–303. doi: 10.1093/bjps/41.3.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nola, Robert. 2012. Rescuing Reason: A Critique of Anti-rationalist Views of Science and Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nola, Robert, and Gürol Irzik. 2003. “Incredulity Towards Lyotard: A Critique of a Postmodernist Account of Science and Knowledge.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34: 391–421. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(03)00024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Christopher. 1997. Against Relativism: Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction, and Critical Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Oberheim, Eric. 2006. Feyerabend’s Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Parusniková, Zuzana. 1992. “Is a Postmodern Philosophy of Science Possible?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 21–37. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(92)90025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, John. 1998. “Science as Supermarket: ‘Post-modern’ Themes in Paul Feyerabend’s Later Philosophy of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 425–447. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaven, Sheldon J. 2000. “Time Well Spent: On Paul Feyerabend’s Autobiography.” In The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend, edited by John Preston, Gonzalo Munévar, and David Lamb, 16–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1987. “Posties.” London Review of Books, 3 Sep., 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1991. Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, Joseph. 1991. “The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science.” Philosophy of Science 58: 607–627. doi: 10.1086/289643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, Stuart. 2011. The Lyotard Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, Stuart. 2013. Fifty Key Postmodern Thinkers. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Robert C. 1988. Continental Philosophy since 1750: The Rise and Fall of the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tambolo, Luca. 2014. “Pliability and Resistance: Feyerabendian Insights into Sophisticated Realism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4: 197–213. doi: 10.1007/s13194-014-0082-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsou, Jonathan Y. 2003. “Reconsidering Feyerabend’s ‘Anarchism’.” Perspectives on Science 11: 208–235. doi: 10.1162/106361403322495894
   Google Scholar
• Wheale, Nigel, ed. 1995. The Postmodern Arts: An Introductory Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar