The History of Science as a Graveyard of Theories: A Philosophers’ Myth?

References

• Bonk, Thomas. 2008. Underdetermination: An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, Anjan. 2008. “What You Don’t Know Can’t Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived.” Philosophical Studies 137: 149–158. doi: 10.1007/s11098-007-9173-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Hasok. 2011. “The Persistence of Epistemic Objects through Scientific Change.” Erkenntnis 75: 413–429. doi: 10.1007/s10670-011-9340-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. Bernard. 1987. Revolution in Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, Michael. 2011. “Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism?” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 285–293. doi: 10.1007/s10838-011-9166-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doppelt, Gerald. 2007. “Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-induction.” Philosophy of Science 74: 96–118. doi: 10.1086/520685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2011. “How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change.” Synthese 180: 139–155. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9602-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2016. “Scientific Revolutions and the Explosion of Scientific Evidence.” Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1193-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2011. “From the Pessimistic Induction to Semantic Antirealism.” Philosophy of Science 78: 1131–1142. doi: 10.1086/662265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2014. “Can the Pessimistic Induction Be Saved from Semantic Anti-realism about Scientific Theory?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65: 521–548. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axt013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govier, Trudy. 2010. A Practical Study of Argument. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Daniel W. 2013. Science before Socrates: Parmenides, Anaxagoras, and the New Astronomy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, David. 2015. Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Peter. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbron, John L., ed. 2003. The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, Milena. 2010. “Pierre Duhem’s Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyman, James. 2011. “Structural Realism versus Standard Scientific Realism: The Case of Phlogiston and Dephlogisticated Air.” Synthese 180: 87–101. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9607-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2002. “Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions and the Turnover Fallacy.” Analysis 62: 281–285. doi: 10.1093/analys/62.4.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, Larry. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49. doi: 10.1086/288975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, Jonathan, and Richard Rennie, eds. 2015. A Dictionary of Physics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Peter J. 2001. “Why the Pessimistic Induction Is a Fallacy.” Synthese 129: 371–380. doi: 10.1023/A:1013139410613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Peter. 2005. “The Truth about Science.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 1259–1269. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, Ernan. 2002. “The Origins of the Field Concept in Physics.” Physics in Perspective 4: 13–39. doi: 10.1007/s00016-002-8357-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, Moti. 2013. “The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone Too Far.” Synthese 190: 3209–3226. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0138-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, Moti. 2015a. “Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis: What’s the Argument?” Social Epistemology 29: 361–378. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2014.922635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, Moti. 2015b. “Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-picking.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29: 129–148. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2015.1119413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Florian. 2015. “The Pessimistic Meta-induction: Obsolete through Scientific Progress?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29: 393–412. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2015.1195144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, Samir. 2002. “Underdetermination, Holism, and the Theory/Data Distinction.” Philosophical Quarterly 52: 303–319. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Reference. 2003. The Oxford Companion to the History of Science . Accessed 10 March 2017. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195112290.001.0001/acref-9780195112290.
   Google Scholar
• Papineau, D. 2010. “Realism, Ramsey Sentences and the Pessimistic Meta-induction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 375–385. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Seungbae. 2011. “A Confutation of the Pessimistic Induction.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 75–84. doi: 10.1007/s10838-010-9130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Seungbae. 2014. “A Pessimistic Induction against Scientific Antirealism.” Organon F 21: 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, Marga, and Eliot Michaelson. 2014. “Reference.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2014 ed., edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/reference/.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, Richard, and Jonathan Law, eds. 2016. A Dictionary of Chemistry. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhmkorff, Samuel. 2014. “Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27: 409–428. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.868185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatsi, Juha T. 2005. “On the Pessimistic Induction and Two Fallacies.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1088–1098. doi: 10.1086/508959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatsi, Juha. 2015. “Historical Inductions, Old and New.” Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0855-5.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, Merrilee H. 2013. Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, Howard. 2008. Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Kathryn. 2011. “The Pessimistic Meta-induction from the History of Science.” Edge. https://edge.org/response-detail/11135.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Roy. 2013. “Veridical Idealizations.” In Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts, edited by Mélanie Frappier, Letitia Meynell, and James Robert Brown, 30–52. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Springer. 2017. “Springer Archives.” Accessed 10 March 2017. http://resource-cms.springer.com/springer-cms/rest/v1/content/10704936/data/v4/Springer+Archives+Brochure.
   Google Scholar
• Springer Exemplar. 2017. “About.” Accessed 10 March 2017. http://www.springerexemplar.com/about.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. Kyle. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science. Translated by Daniel W. Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varvoglis, Harry. 2014. History and Evolution of Concepts in Physics. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, Peter. 2013. “A Confrontation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 80: 189–211. doi: 10.1086/670297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2011. Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2013. “The Pessimistic Induction and the Exponential Growth of Science Reassessed.” Synthese 190: 4321–4330. doi: 10.1007/s11229-013-0276-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2015. “Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29: 61–73. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2015.1071551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar