Information, Reality, and Modern Physics

References

• Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brillouin, L. 1956. Science and Information Theory. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bub, J. 2004. “Why the Quantum?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35: 241–266. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2003.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1, The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, A. 2003. “The Structuralist Conception of Objects.” Philosophy of Science 70: 867–878. doi: 10.1086/377373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, J. G. 1986. “The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 58: 647–687. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorato, M. 2013. “Rovelli’s Relational Quantum Mechanics, Anti-monism, and Quantum Becoming.” In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by A. Marmodoro and D. Yates, 235–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. [1905] 1952. “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” In A. Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, H. Weyl, and H. Minkowski, The Principle of Relativity, 35–65. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. 1949. “Autobiographical Notes.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 1–94. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Esfeld, M., and V. Lam. 2011. “Ontic Structural Realism as a Metaphysics of Objects.” In Scientific Structuralism, edited by A. Bokulich and P. Bokulich, 143–159. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, H. 1957. “‘Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 29: 454–462. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2004. “Informational Realism.” Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology 37: 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2008. “A Defence of Informational Structural Realism.” Synthese 161: 219–253. doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9163-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2010. Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2011. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. A., N. D. Mermin, and R. Schack. 2014. “An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics.” American Journal of Physics 82: 749–754. doi: 10.1119/1.4874855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaynes, E. T. 1989. “Clearing Up Mysteries—The Original Goal.” In Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, edited by J. Skilling, 1–27. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J. 1998. “What Is Structural Realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 409–424. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J., and D. Ross. 2007. “Ontic Structural Realism and the Philosophy of Physics.” In Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, edited by J. Ladyman, D. Ross, D. Spurrett, and J. Collier, 130–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentz, H. A. [1904] 1952. “Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with Any Velocity Smaller than That of Light.” In A. Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, H. Weyl, and H. Minkowski, The Principle of Relativity, 9–34. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mermin, D. 1998. “What Is Quantum Mechanics Trying to Tell Us?” American Journal of Physics 66: 753–767. doi: 10.1119/1.18955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, J. D. Forthcoming. “Maxwell’s Demon Does Not Compute.” In Physical Perspectives on Computation, Computational Perspectives on Physics, edited by M. E. Cuffaro and S. C. Fletcher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D., J. Ladyman, and D. Spurrett. 2007. “In Defence of Scientism.” In Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, edited by J. Ladyman, D. Ross, D. Spurrett, and J. Collier, 1–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovelli, C. 1996. “Relational Quantum Mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35: 1637–1678. doi: 10.1007/BF02302261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovelli, C. 1997. “ Relational Quantum Mechanics.” arXiv:quant-ph/9609002.
   Google Scholar
• Rovelli, C., and M. Smerlak. 2007. “Relational EPR.” Foundations of Physics 37: 427–445. doi: 10.1007/s10701-007-9105-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stachel, J. 2006. “Structure, Individuality and Quantum Gravity.” In Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, edited by D. Rickles, S. French, and J. Saatsi, 53–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szilard, Leo. 1929. “Über die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen.” Zeitschrift für Physik 53: 840–856. doi: 10.1007/BF01341281
   Google Scholar
• Timpson, C. G. 2013. Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. C. 2010. “Rovelli’s World.” Foundations of Physics 40: 390–418. doi: 10.1007/s10701-009-9326-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, J. A. 1990. “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links.” In Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, edited by W. H. Zurek, 3–28. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. [1948] 1961. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Second ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N. 1950. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
   Google Scholar
• Zeilinger, A. 2004. “Why the Quantum? ‘It’ From ‘Bit’? A Participatory Universe? Three Far-reaching Challenges from John Archibald Wheeler and Their Relation to Experiment.” In Science and Ultimate Reality, edited by J. D. Barrow, P. C. W. Davies, and C. L. Harper, 201–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeilinger, A. 2005. “ Why the Quantum? It from Bit? A Participatory Universe? Three Far Reaching, Visionary Questions from John Archibald Wheeler and How They Inspired a Quantum Experimentalist.” Metanexus. http://www.metanexus.net/archive/ ultimate_reality/zeilinger.pdf.
   Google Scholar