208
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Varying the Explanatory Span: Scientific Explanation for Computer Simulations

References

  • Atkinson, K. E., W. Han, and D. E. Stewart. 2009. Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Barnes, E. 1992. “Explanatory Unification and Scientific Understanding.” In PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik, vol. 1, 3–12. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
  • Barnes, E. 1994. “Explaining Brute Facts.” In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. M. Burian, vol. 1, 61–68. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
  • Beisbart, C. 2012. “How Can Computer Simulations Produce New Knowledge?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2: 395–434. doi: 10.1007/s13194-012-0049-7
  • Boukharta, L., H. Gutiérrez-de Terán, and J. Åqvist. 2014. “Computational Prediction of Alanine Scanning and Ligand Binding Energetics in G-Protein Coupled Receptors.” PLoS Computational Biology 10 (4): e1003585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003585
  • Bueno, O. 2014. “Computer Simulations: An Inferential Conception.” Monist 97: 378–398. doi: 10.5840/monist201497324
  • de Regt, H. W., and D. Dieks. 2005. “A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding.” Synthese 144: 137–170. doi: 10.1007/s11229-005-5000-4
  • Durán, J. M. 2013. “The Use of the ‘Materiality Argument’ in the Literature on Computer Simulations.” In Computer Simulations and the Changing Face of Scientific Experimentation, edited by J. M. Durán and E. Arnold, 76–98. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Durán, J. M. 2017. “The Novelty of Computer Simulations: New Challenges for the Philosophy of Science.” Unpublished.
  • Elgin, C. 2007. “Understanding and the Facts.” Philosophical Studies 132: 33–42. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9054-z
  • Elgin, C. 2009. “Is Understanding Factive?” In Epistemic Value, edited by A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. H. Pritchard, 322–330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • El Skaf, R., and C. Imbert. 2013. “Unfolding in the Empirical Sciences: Experiments, Thought Experiments and Computer Simulations.” Synthese 190: 3451–3474. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0203-y
  • Fahrbach, L. 2005. “Understanding Brute Facts.” Synthese 145: 449–466. doi: 10.1007/s11229-005-6200-7
  • Friedman, M. 1974. “Explanation and Scientific Understanding.” Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19. doi: 10.2307/2024924
  • Guala, F. 2002. “Models, Simulations, and Experiments.” In Model-based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, edited by L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian, 59–74. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  • Hartmann, S. 1996. “The World as a Process: Simulations in the Natural and Social Sciences.” In Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View, edited by R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, and K. G. Troitzsch, 77–100. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Humphreys, P. W. 1991. “Computer Simulations.” In PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, vol. 2, 497–506. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
  • Humphreys, P. W. 2004. Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kitcher, P. 1981. “Explanatory Unification.” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531. doi: 10.1086/289019
  • Kitcher, P. 1989. “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World.” In Scientific Explanation, edited by P. Kitcher and W. C. Salmon, 410–505. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Krohs, U. 2008. “How Digital Computer Simulations Explain Real-world Processes.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22: 277–292. doi: 10.1080/02698590802567324
  • Küppers, G., and J. Lenhard. 2005. “Validation of Simulation: Patterns in the Social and Natural Sciences.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8 (4). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/3/html.
  • Lenhard, J. 2007. “Computer Simulation: The Cooperation Between Experimenting and Modeling.” Philosophy of Science 74: 176–194. doi: 10.1086/519029
  • Morgan, M. S. 2003. “Experiments Without Material Intervention.” In The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, edited by H. Radder, 216–235. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Morgan, M. S. 2005. “Experiments Versus Models: New Phenomena, Inference and Surprise.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 317–329. doi: 10.1080/13501780500086313
  • Morrison, M. 2009. “Models, Measurement and Computer Simulation: The Changing Face of Experimentation.” Philosophical Studies 143: 33–57. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9317-y
  • Oberkampf, W. L., and C. Roy. 2010. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parker, W. S. 2009. “Does Matter Really Matter? Computer Simulations, Experiments, and Materiality.” Synthese 169: 483–496. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9434-3
  • Reutlinger, A., D. Hangleiter, and S. Hartmann. 2017. “Understanding (with) Toy Models.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx005.
  • Salmon, W. C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schurz, G., and K. Lambert. 1994. “Outline of a Theory of Scientific Understanding.” Synthese 101: 65–120.
  • Weirich, P. 2011. “The Explanatory Power of Models and Simulations: A Philosophical Exploration.” Simulation and Gaming 42: 155–176. doi: 10.1177/1046878108319639
  • Winsberg, E. 1999. “Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation.” Science in Context 12: 275–292. doi: 10.1017/S0269889700003422
  • Winsberg, E. 2010. Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Woolfson, M. M., and G. J. Pert. 1999a. An Introduction to Computer Simulations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Woolfson, M. M., and G. J. Pert. 1999b. SATELLIT.FOR. Computer program distributed by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.