Specialisation, Interdisciplinarity, and Incommensurability

References

• Alvargonzález, David. 2011. “Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25: 387–403. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2011.623366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne. 2012. “Conceptual Development in Interdisciplinary Research.” In Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice, edited by Uljana Feest and Friedrich Steinle, 271–292. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne. 2013a. “Bridging Disciplines: Conceptual Development in Interdisciplinary Groups.” In Classification and Evolution in Biology, Linguistics and the History of Science, edited by Frangerau Heiner, Hans Geisler, Thorsten Halling, and William Martin, 33–44. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne. 2013b. “The Second Essential Tension: On Tradition and Innovation in Interdisciplinary Research.” Topoi 32: 3–8. doi: 10.1007/s11245-012-9133-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne. 2016. “Collaboration, Interdisciplinarity, and the Epistemology of Contemporary Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne, and Susann Wagenknecht. 2013. “Epistemic Dependence in Interdisciplinary Groups.” Synthese 190: 1881–1898. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0172-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankeny, Rachel A., and Sabina Leonelli. 2016. “Repertoires: A Post-Kuhnian Perspective on Scientific Change and Collaborative Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 60: 18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2000. Thomas Kuhn. Chesham: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2002. “Kuhn’s Wrong Turning.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 443–463. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2004a. “Kuhn, Naturalism, and the Positivist Legacy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35: 337–356. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2004b. “Kuhn on Reference and Essence.” Philosophia Scientae 8: 39–71. doi: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.588
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2005. “Naturalizing Kuhn.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2007. “Incommensurability Naturalized.” In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities?, edited by Léna Soler, Howard Sankey, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene, 21–39. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, Seamus. 2017. “Constraints on Rational Theory Choice.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68: 639–661. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axv063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, Seamus, and Karim P. Y. Thébault. 2017. “Models on the Move: Migration and Imperialism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome S., and Leo Postman. 1949. “On the Perception of Incongruity: A Paradigm.” Journal of Personality 18: 206–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01241.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Hasok. 2012. “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution.” In Kuhn’s “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” Revisited, edited by Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis, 153–177. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Darden, Lindley, and Nancy Maull. 1977. “Interfield Theories.” Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64. doi: 10.1086/288723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1962. “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism.” In Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, edited by Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell, 28–97. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gattei, Stefano. 2008. Thomas Kuhn’s “Linguistic Turn” and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Success Without Integration.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6: 343–360. doi: 10.1007/s13194-016-0139-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1993. “Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, edited by Paul Horwich, 275–310. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardwig, John. 1985. “Epistemic Dependence.” Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–349. doi: 10.2307/2026523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwig, John. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 88: 693–708. doi: 10.2307/2027007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Britt J. 2013. “What Is Interdisciplinary Communication? Reflections on the Very Idea of Disciplinary Integration.” Synthese 190: 1865–1879. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irzik, Gürol, and Teo Grünberg. 1998. “Whorfian Variations on Kantian Themes: Kuhn’s Linguistic Turn.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 207–221. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00003-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie T. 1996. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, Tarja, and Andrea Loettgers. 2016. “Model Templates within and between Disciplines: From Magnets to Gases—and Socio-economic Systems.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6: 377–400. doi: 10.1007/s13194-016-0145-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery.” Science 136: 760–764. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3518.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” In Thomas S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 320–339. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1990. “Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation.” In Scientific Theories, edited by Wade C. Savage, 58–89. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 2000. The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Edited by James Conant and John Haugeland. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. [1962] 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2008. Meaning Changes: A Study of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy. Saarbrucken: Verlag Dr. Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2010. “Kuhn on Essentialism and the Causal Theory of Reference.” Philosophy of Science 77: 544–564. doi: 10.1086/656008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenoir, Timothy. 1997. “The Discipline of Nature and the Nature of Disciplines.” In Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines, edited by Timothy Lenoir, 45–74. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Miles. 2018. “What Makes Interdisciplinarity Difficult? Some Consequences of Domain Specificity in Interdisciplinary Practice.” Synthese 195: 697–720. doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1236-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Miles, and Nancy J. Nersessian. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Problem-solving: Emerging Modes in Integrative Systems Biology.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6: 401–418. doi: 10.1007/s13194-016-0157-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2016. “Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity: What? Why? How?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6: 327–342. doi: 10.1007/s13194-016-0162-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, Howard. 1993. Paradigms and Barriers: How Habits of Mind Govern Scientific Beliefs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masterman, Margaret. 1970. “The Nature of a Paradigm.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 59–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Gregory J. 2016. “What Is a Virus Species? Radical Pluralism in Viral Taxonomy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 59: 64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morreau, Michael. 2015. “Theory Choice and Social Choice: Kuhn Vindicated.” Mind 124: 239–262. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzu176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, Samir. 2011. “Theory Choice and Social Choice: Kuhn Versus Arrow.” Mind 120: 83–115. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasha, Samir. 2015. “On Arrow’s Theorem and Scientific Rationality: Reply to Morreau and Stegenga.” Mind 124: 279–294. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzu177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osbeck, Lisa M., and Nancy J. Nersessian. 2017. “Epistemic Identities in Interdisciplinary Science.” Perspectives on Science 25: 226–260. doi: 10.1162/POSC_a_00242
   Google Scholar
• Politi, Vincenzo. 2018. “Specialization and the Incommensurability Among Scientific Specialties.” Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Hilary Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, 215–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, Rupert, and Wes Sharrock. 2002. “Thomas Kuhn’s Misunderstood Relation to Kripke-Putnam Essentialism.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33: 151–158. doi: 10.1023/A:1020755503087
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, Nicholas. 1978. Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Alan W. 2002. “Narrating the History of Reason Itself: Friedman, Kuhn, and a Constitutive A Priori for the Twenty-first Century.” Perspectives on Science 10: 253–274. doi: 10.1162/106361402321899050
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, Jospeh. 2003. “Kuhn’s Philosophy of Scientific Practice.” In Thomas Kuhn, edited by Thomas Nickles, 101–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, Joseph. 2013. “Recovering Thomas Kuhn.” Topoi 32: 59–64. doi: 10.1007/s11245-012-9143-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankey, Howard. 1994. The Incommensurability Thesis. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, Howard. 1998. “Taxonomic Incommensurability.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12: 7–16. doi: 10.1080/02698599808573578
   Google Scholar
• Shapere, Dudley. 1966. “Meaning and Scientific Change.” In Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, edited by Robert Colodny, 41–85. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharrock, Wes, and Rupert Read. 2002. Kuhn: Philosopher of Scientific Revolutions. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stegenga, Jacob. 2015. “Theory Choice and Social Choice: Okasha Versus Sen.” Mind 124: 263–277. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzu180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-Diáz, Edna. 2009. “Molecular Evolution: Concepts and the Origin of Disciplines.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen. 1962. Human Understanding. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Helvoort, Ton. 1991. “What Is a Virus? The Case of Tobacco Mosaic Disease.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22: 577–588. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(91)90034-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helvoort, Ton. 1992. “Bacteriological and Physiological Research Styles in the Early Controversy on the Nature of the Bacteriophage Phenomenon.” Medical History 36: 243–270. doi: 10.1017/S0025727300055265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helvoort, Ton. 1993. “A Bacteriological Paradigm in Influenza Research in the First Half of the Twentieth Century.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 15: 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helvoort, Ton. 1994. “History of Virus Research in the Twentieth Century: The Problem of Conceptual Continuity.” History of Science 32: 185–235. doi: 10.1177/007327539403200204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2011. Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar