157
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Computer Simulation, Experiment, and Novelty

ORCID Icon

References

  • Barberousse, A., S. Franceschelli, and C. Imbert. 2009. “Computer Simulations as Experiments.” Synthese 169: 557–574. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9430-7
  • Barberousse, A., and M. Vorms. 2013. “Computer Simulations and Empirical Data.” In Computer Simulations and the Changing Face of Scientific Experimentation, edited by J. M. Durán and E. Arnold, 29–45. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Beisbart, C., and J. D. Norton. 2012. “Why Monte Carlo Simulations Are Inferences and Not Experiments.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26: 403–422. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2012.748497
  • Berlekamp, E. R., J. H. Conway, and R. K. Guy. 2004. Winning Ways For Your Mathematical Plays. 2nd ed. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters.
  • Dowling, D. 1999. “Experimenting on Theories.” Science in Context 12: 261–273. doi: 10.1017/S0269889700003410
  • Duc, P.-A., F. Bournaud, and E. Brinks. 2007. “Tidal Debris Posing as Dark Galaxies.” In Dark Galaxies and Lost Baryons, edited by J. I. Davies and M. J. Disney, 216–225. Paris: International Astronomical Union.
  • Galison, P. 1996. “Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by P. Galison and D. J. Stump, 118–157. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Giere, R. N. 2009. “Is Computer Simulation Changing the Face of Experimentation?” Philosophical Studies 143: 59–62. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9314-1
  • Guala, F. 2002. “Models, Simulations, and Experiments.” In Model-based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, edited by L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian, 59–74. New York: Kluwer.
  • Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Humphreys, P. 1994. “Numerical Experimentation.” In Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher, edited by P. Humphreys, vol. 2, 103–121. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Humphreys, P. 2004. Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jebeile, J. 2016. “Les Simulations sont-elles des expériences numériques?” Dialogue (Los Angeles) 55: 59–86.
  • Keller, E. F. 2003. “Models, Simulation, and ‘Computer Experiments’.” In The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, edited by H. Radder, 198–215. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. [1962] 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Liu, A. Y., and M. L. Cohen. 1989. “Prediction of New Low Compressibility Solids.” Science 245: 841–842. doi: 10.1126/science.245.4920.841
  • Lusk, G. 2016. “Computer Simulation and the Features of Novel Empirical Data.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56: 145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.005
  • Morgan, M. S. 2002. “Model Experiments and Models in Experiments.” In Model-based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, edited by L. Magnani and N. J. Nersessian, 41–58. New York: Kluwer.
  • Morgan, M. S. 2003. “Experiments Without Material Intervention: Model Experiments, Virtual Experiments, and Virtually Experiments.” In The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, edited by H. Radder, 216–235. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Morgan, M. S. 2005. “Experiments Versus Models: New Phenomena, Inference, and Surprise.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 317–329. doi: 10.1080/13501780500086313
  • Morrison, M. 2009. “Models, Measurement and Computer Simulation: The Changing Face of Experimentation.” Philosophical Studies 143: 33–47. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9317-y
  • Morrison, M. 2015. Reconstructing Reality: Models, Mathematics, and Simulations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Norton, S. D., and F. Suppe. 2001. “Why Atmospheric Modeling Is Good Science.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by C. A. Miller and P. N. Edwards, 67–106. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pan, Z., H. Sun, Y. Zhang, and C. Chen. 2009. “Harder than Diamond: Superior Indentation Strength of Wurtzite BN and Lonsdaleite.” Physical Review Letters 102: 055503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.055503
  • Parke, E. C. 2014. “Experiments, Simulations, and Epistemic Privilege.” Philosophy of Science 81: 516–536. doi: 10.1086/677956
  • Parker, W. S. 2009. “Does Matter Really Matter? Computer Simulations, Experiments, and Materiality.” Synthese 169: 483–496. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9434-3
  • Radder, H. 1996. In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Rohrlich, F. 1991. “Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences.” In PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, vol. 2, 507–518. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
  • Sismondo, S. 1999. “Models, Simulations and Their Objects.” Science in Context 12: 247–260. doi: 10.1017/S0269889700003409
  • Suchman, L. A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tiles, J. E. 1993. “Experiment as Intervention.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 463–475. doi: 10.1093/bjps/44.3.463
  • Turkle, S., and S. Papert. 1991. “Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete.” In Constructionism: Research Reports and Essays 1985–1990, edited by I. Harel and S. Papert, 161–191. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Winsberg, E. 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World.” Philosophy of Science 70: 105–125. doi: 10.1086/367872
  • Winsberg, E. 2009. “A Tale of Two Methods.” Synthese 169: 575–592. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9437-0
  • Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.