Empirical Physicalism and the Boundaries of Physics

References

• Crane, Tim, and D. H. Mellor. 1990. “There Is No Question of Physicalism.” Mind 99: 185–206. doi: 10.1093/mind/XCIX.394.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey, Jonathan E. 2011. “On the Supposed Limits of Physicalist Theories of Mind.” Philosophical Studies 155: 207–225. doi: 10.1007/s11098-010-9558-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, Janice. 2006. “The Physical: Empirical, Not Metaphysical.” Philosophical Studies 131: 25–60. doi: 10.1007/s11098-005-5983-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elpidorou, Andreas. 2016. “A Posteriori Physicalism and Introspection.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97: 474–500. doi: 10.1111/papq.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2018. “Physics.” https://www.britannica.com/science/physics-science.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorese, Raphaël. 2016. “Stoljar’s Dilemma and Three Conceptions of the Physical: A Defence of the Via Negativa.” Erkenntnis 81: 201–229. doi: 10.1007/s10670-015-9735-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff, Philip. 2011. “A Posteriori Physicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89: 191–209. doi: 10.1080/00048401003649617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff, Philip. 2017. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, Philip, William Seager, and Sean Allen-Hermanson. 2017. “Panpsychism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl G. 1969. “Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, edited by Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes, and Morton G. White, 179–199. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, Robert J. 2008. “Subjective Physicalism.” In The Case for Qualia, edited by Edmond L. Wright, 125–139. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, Robert J. 2009. “The Ontology of Subjective Physicalism.” Noûs 43: 315–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00708.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, Robert J. 2013. Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity: The Case for Subjective Physicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttemann, Andreas, and David Papineau. 2005. “Physicalism Decomposed.” Analysis 65: 33–39. doi: 10.1093/analys/65.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Frank. 1978. “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136. doi: 10.2307/2960077
   Google Scholar
• Markosian, Ned. 2000. “What Are Physical Objects?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 375–395. doi: 10.2307/2653656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudlin, Tim. 2012. Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, James Clerk. 1876. Matter and Motion. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, D. H. 1973. “Materialism and Phenomenal Qualities.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 47: 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk, Andrew. 1997. “How to Keep the ‘Physical’ in Physicalism.” Journal of Philosophy 94: 622–637. doi: 10.2307/2564597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk, Andrew. 2003. A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, Barbara G. 1999. “The Body Problem.” Noûs 33: 183–200. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, Barbara G. 2001. “Post-physicalism.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, Barbara G. 2009. “What Is the Physical?” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by Ansgar Beckermann, Brian P. MacLaughlin, and Sven Walter, 173–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, Barbara G., and David Papineau. 2005. “A Defence of the via negativa Argument for Physicalism.” Analysis 65: 233–237. doi: 10.1093/analys/65.3.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nida-Rümelin, Martina. 2015. “Qualia: The Knowledge Argument.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/qualia-knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paolini Paoletti, Michele. 2018. “Formulating Emergence.” Ratio 31: 1–18. doi: 10.1111/rati.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papineau, David. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Papineau, David. 2000. “The Rise of Physicalism.” In The Proper Ambition of Science, edited by Martin W. F. Stone and Jonathan Wolff, 174–208. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1992. “The Nature of Naturalism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 66: 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, Jeffrey. 1994. Physicalism: The Philosophical Foundations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, Oliver. 2013. “Substantivalist and Relationist Approaches to Spacetime.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, edited by Robert Batterman, 522–586. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard van Orman. 1976. “Whither Physical Objects?” In Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, edited by Robert S. Cohen, Paul K. Feyerabend, and Marx W. Wartofsky, 497–504. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. J. C. 1978. “The Content of Physicalism.” Philosophical Quarterly 28: 339–341. doi: 10.2307/2219085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoljar, Daniel. 2010. Physicalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoljar, Daniel. 2017. “Physicalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/physicalism.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Galen. 2008. Real Materialism and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburne, Richard. 2009. “Substance Dualism.” Faith and Philosophy 26: 501–513. doi: 10.5840/faithphil200926551
   Google Scholar
• Tye, Michael. 2018. “Qualia.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/qualia.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Jessica. 2006. “On Characterizing the Physical.” Philosophical Studies 131: 61–99. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-5984-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Hugh D., and Roger A. Freedman. 2012. University Physics. 13th ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar