95
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Epistemic Puzzle About Knowledge and Rational Credence

References

  • Baker-Hytch, Max, and Benton, Matthew A. 2015. “Defeatism Defeated.” Philosophical Perspectives 29: 40–66. doi: 10.1111/phpe.12056
  • Bar-Hillel, Maya. 1980. “The Base Rate Fallacy in Probability Judgments.” Acta Psychologica 44: 211–233. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3
  • Beddor, Bob. 2015. “Process Reliabilism’s Troubles with Defeat.” Philosophical Quarterly 65: 145–159. doi: 10.1093/pq/pqu075
  • Buchak, Lara. 2014. “Belief Credence and Norms.” Philosophical Studies 169: 285–311. doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0182-y
  • Campbell, John. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lasonen Aarnio, Maria. 2010. “Unreasonable Knowledge.” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00183.x
  • Lewis, David. 1981. “Causal Decision Theory.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 5–30. doi: 10.1080/00048408112340011
  • Martin, M. G. F. 2002. “The Transparency of Experience.” Mind and Language 17: 376–425. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00205
  • McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Pérez Otero, Manuel. 2018. “¿Existe conocimiento epistémicamente irracional?” Principia: an International Journal of Epistemology 22: 229–249. doi: 10.5007/1808-1711.2018v22n2p229
  • Siegel, Susanna. 2012. “Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification.” Noûs 46: 201–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00786.x
  • Smith, Martin. 2016. Between Probability and Certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Staffel, Julia. 2016. “Beliefs, Buses and Lotteries: Why Rational Belief Cannot be Stably High Credence.” Philosophical Studies 173: 1721–1724. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0574-2
  • Titelbaum, Michael G. 2013. Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework Modeling Degrees of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
  • Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.