Geometrical Constructivism and Modal Relationalism: Further Aspects of the Dynamical/Geometrical Debate

References

• Anderson, J. L. 1967. Principles of Relativity Physics. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acuña, Pablo. 2016. “Minkowski Spacetime and Lorentz Invariance: The Cart and the Horse Or Two Sides of a Single Coin?.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, John S. 1987. “How to Teach Special Relativity.” In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belot, Gordon 2007. “The Representation of Time and Change in Mechanics.” In Philosophy of Physics, Vol. 2 of. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, edited by J. N. Butterfield and J. Earman, 133–227. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Belot, Gordon 2011. Geometric Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey R. 2005. Physical Relativity: Spacetime Structure From a Dynamical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey R., and Dennis Lehmkuhl. 2015. “Einstein, the Reality of Space, and the Action-Reaction Principle.” In The Nature of Reality, edited by P. Ghose. London: Pickering and Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey R., and Oliver Pooley. 2001. “The Origins of the Spacetime Metric: Bell's Lorentzian Pedagogy and its Significance in General Relativity.” In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Plank Scale, edited by Craig Callender and Nick Huggett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey R., and Oliver Pooley. 2006. “Minkowski Space-Time: A Glorious Non-Entity.” In The Ontology of Spacetime, edited by Dennis Dieks. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Harvey R., and James Read. 2020. “The Dynamical Approach to Spacetime Theories.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics, edited by E. Knox and A. Wilson. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, Jeremy 2007. “Reconsidering Relativistic Causality.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3): 295–328. doi: 10.1080/02698590701589585
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy 2008. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, Rob 1998. “Scientific Explanation in Quantum Theory.” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/91/.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, Neil 2020. “General-Relativistic Covariance.” Foundations of Physics 50: 294–318. doi: 10.1007/s10701-019-00256-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorato, Mauro 2007. “Relativity Theory Between Structural and Dynamical Explanations.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1): 95–102. doi: 10.1080/02698590701305891
   Google Scholar
• Dorato, Mauro, and Laura Felline. 2010. “Structural Explanations in Minkowski Spacetime: Which Account of Models?” In Space, Time, and Spacetime: Physical and Philosophical Implications of Minkowski's Unification of Space and Time, edited by V. Petkov. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert 1905. “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper.” Annalen Der Physik 17: 891–921. Reprinted as Doc. 23 in J. Stachel: et al. (eds.): The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987–2006. doi: 10.1002/andp.19053221004
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert 1919. “Time, Space, and Gravitation.” In The Times, 28th November 1919. Reprinted as Doc. 26 in J. Stachel: et al. (eds.): The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 7. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 987–2006.
   Google Scholar
• Felline, Laura 2011. “Scientific Explanation Between Principle and Constructive Theories.” Philosophy of Science 78: 989–1000. doi: 10.1086/662270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael 1974. “Explanation and Scientific Understanding.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.2307/2024924
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael 1983. Foundations of Space–Time Theories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Mathias 2011. “Principle Or Constructive Relativity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42: 176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiskes, Anne L. D. 1984. “Space-Time Theories and Symmetry Groups.” Foundations of Physics 14 (4): 307–332. doi: 10.1007/BF00738921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, Michel 2009. “Drawing the Line Between Kinematics and Dynamics in Special Relativity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40: 26–52. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip 1989. “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by P. Kitcher and W. Salmon Vol. 13, 410–503. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmann, Erich 1917. “Über Den Physikalischen Sinn Der Relativitätspostulate.” Annalen Der Physik 53: 575–614.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc 2007. “Laws and Meta-Laws of Nature: Conservation Laws and Symmetries.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38: 457–481. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc 2018. “Because Without Cause.” In Explanation Beyond Causation: Philosophical Perspectives on Non-Causal Explanations, edited by A. Reutlinger and J. Saatsi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maudlin, Tim 2012. Philosophy of Physics Volume I: Space and Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, Tushar 2019. “Algebraic Fields and the Dynamical Approach to Physical Geometry.” Philosophy of Science 86: 1273–1283. doi: 10.1086/705508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrvold, Wayne C. 2019. “How Could Relativity Be Anything Other Than Physical?.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67: 137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, John D. 2008. “Why Constructive Relativity Fails.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59: 821–834. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axn046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. Brian 2006. “Absolute Objects and Counterexamples: Jones–Geroch Dust, Torretti Constant Curvature, Tetrad-Spinor, and Scalar Density.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37: 347–371. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. Brian 2011a. “Massive Nordström Scalar (Density) Gravities From Universal Coupling.” General Relativity and Gravitation 43: 871–895. doi: 10.1007/s10714-010-1100-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. Brian 2011b. “Permanent Underdetermination From Approximate Empirical Equivalence in Field Theory: Massless and Massive Scalar Gravity, Neutrino, Electromagnetic, Yang-Mills and Gravitational Theories.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 259–299. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axq014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. Brian 2016. “Space-time Philosophy Reconstructed via Massive Nordström Scalar Gravities? Laws vs. Geometry, Conventionality, and Underdetermination.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53: 73–92. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. 2019. “Space-time Constructivism vs. Modal Provincialism: Or, How Special Relativistic Theories Needn't Show Minkowski Chronogeometry.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67: 191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooley, Oliver 2002. “The Reality of Spacetime.” D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, Oliver 2013. “Substantivalist and Relationist Approaches to Spacetime.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, edited by R. Batterman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, Oliver 2017. “Background Independence, Diffeomorphism Invariance, and the Meaning of Coordinates.” In Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, edited by D. Lehmkuhl, G. Schiemann and E. Scholz. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, Oliver 2017. “Fundamentality and the Dynamical Approach.” (Unpublished transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, Oliver, and James Read. 2020. “On the Mathematics and Metaphysics of the hole Argument.” (Unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Read, James 2016. “Background Independence in Classical and Quantum Gravity. H” B.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Read, James 2019. “On Miracles and Spacetime.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65: 103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, James 2020. “Explanation, Geometry, and Conspiracy in Relativity Theory.” In Thinking About Space and Time: 100 Years of Applying and Interpreting General Relativity, edited by C. Beisbart, T. Sauer and C. Wüthrich, Einstein Studies series, vol. 15, Basel: Birkhäuser. (Forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Read, James, Harvey R. Brown, and Dennis Lehmkuhl. 2018. “Two Miracles of General Relativity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64: 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, James, and Tushar Menon. 2019. “The Limitations of Inertial Frame Spacetime Functionalism.” Synthese (Forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Reutlinger, Alexander, and Juha Saatsi, ed. 2018. Explanation Beyond Causation: Philosophical Perspectives on Non-Causal Explanations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, Wesley C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Syman 2020. “Regularity Relationalism and the Constructivist Project.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71: 353–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teitel, Trevor 2019. “Background Independence: Lessons for Further Decades of Dispute.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65: 41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Emily 2018. Absolute Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, Kip S., David L. Lee, and Alan P. Lightman. 1973. “Foundations for a Theory of Gravitation Theories.” Physical Review D 7: 3563–3578. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.3563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Camp, Wesley. 2011. “Principle Theories, Constructive Theories, and Explanations in Modern Physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42: 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, James Owen. 2018. “Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69: 329–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar