Taxonomies, Networks, and Lexicons: A Study of Kuhn’s Post-‘Linguistic Turn’ Philosophy

Bibliography

• Andersen, Hanne. 2000. “Kuhn’s Account of Family Resemblance: a Solution to the Problem of Wide-Open Texture.” Erkenntnis 52: 313–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen. 2006. The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arabatzis, Theodore. 2001. “Can a Historian of Science Be a Scientific Realist?” Philosophy of Science 68: S531–S541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberousse, Anouk. 2007. “From One Version to the Other: Intra-Theoretical Change.” In Hoyningen-Huene (Eds.) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison, edited by L. Soler, and H. Sankey, 87–101. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2000. Thomas Kuhn. Chesham. Acumen and Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2002. “Kuhn's Wrong Turning.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 443–463.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2010. “The Epistemology of Science - a Bird's eye View.” Synthese 175: 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander. 2012. “What Can Cognitive Science Tell us About Scientific Revolutions?” Theoria 75: 293–321.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Ruey-li. 2000. “Theory Version Instead of Articulations of Paradigms.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31: 449–471.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Xian. 2003a. “Object and Event Concepts: a Cognitive Mechanism of Incommensurability.” Philosophy of Science 70: 962–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Xian. 2003b. “Why did Herschel Fail to Understand Polarization? The Differences Between Object and Event Concepts.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34, 491–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Xian. 2005. “Transforming Temporal Knowledge: Conceptual Change Between Event Concepts.” Perspectives on Science 13: 49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Xian. 2007. “The Object Bias and the Study of Scientific Revolutions: Lessons from Developmental Psychology.” Philosophical Psychology 20: 479–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrakos, Thodoris. 2016. “Kuhnianism and neo-Kantianism: on Friedman’s Account of Scientific Change.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30: 361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrakos, Thodoris. 2020. “Scientific Mind and Objective World: Thomas Kuhn Between Naturalism and Apriorism.” Erkenntnis 85: 225–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gattei, Stefano. 2008. Thomas Kuhn’s ‘Linguistic Turn’ and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grandy, Richard. 2003. “Kuhn’s World Changes.” In Thomas Kuhn, edited by T. Nickles, 246–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1982. Language, Truth and Reason. See Hollis, M., and Lukes, S., (Eds.) Rationality and Relativism, 48–66. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1992. “‘Style’ for Historians and Philosophers.” Studies in History AndPhilosophy of Science 23: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1993. “Working in a New World: the Taxonomic Solution.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, edited by P. Horwich, 275–310. Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 2012. “Language, Truth and Reason - 30 Years Later.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 599–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl. 1993. “Thomas Kuhn, Colleague and Friend.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, edited by Paul Horwich, 7–8. Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 1993. Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, Gürol, and Teo Grünberg. 1998. “Whorfian Variations on Kantian Themes: Kuhn's Linguistic Turn.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kindi, Vasso. 2011. “The Challenge of Scientific Revolutions: VanFrassen’s and Friedman’s Responses.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (4): 327–349.
   Google Scholar
• Kindi, Vasso. 2013. “Kuhn’s Paradigm.” In 2013. Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited, edited by V. Kindi, and T. Arabatzis, 91–111. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1974. "Second Thoughts on Paradigms". In The Structure of Scientific Theories edited by F. Suppe, 459–482. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. Second Thoughts on Paradigms. In Kuhn, T. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 293–319. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Originally appeared in Suppe, F. (Ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1974, pp. 459-482.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1983. Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability. In Asquith, P., Nickels, T., and Arbor, A. (Eds.) PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982, pp. 669–688.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1987. “What are Scientific Revolutions?” In The Probabilistic Revolution, edited by L. Kruger, L. Daston, and M. Heidelberger, 7–22. Cambridge: MIT Press. Reprinted in Kuhn, T. (2000), pp. 13-32.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1991. “The Road Since Structure.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2): 2–13. Reprinted in Kuhn, T. (2000), pp. 90-104.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1992. “The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science.” In Occasional Publication of the Department of History of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University. Reprinted in Kuhn, T. (2000) The Road since Structure. Philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 105-120.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1993. “Afterwords.” In World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science edited by P. Horwich, 311–341. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1st ed.: 1962; 2nd ed. with Postscript: 1970; 3rd ed.: 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 2000. The Road Since Structure. Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by J. Conant, and J. Haugeland. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcum, James. 2013. “From Paradigm to Disciplinary Matrix and Exemplar.” In Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited, edited by V. Kindi, and T. Arabatzis, 41–63. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Masterman, Margaret. 1970. “The Nature of a Paradigm.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, edited by I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave, 59–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, Jeffrey. 2003. “A Rosa Multiflora by any Other Name: Taxonomic Incommensurability and Scientific Kinds.” Synthese 136: 337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrhai, Moti, ed. 2018. The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, Nancy. 2003. “Kuhn, Conceptual Change and Cognitive Science.” In Thomas Kuhn, edited by T. Nickles, 178–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, Thomas. 2003. “Normal Science: From Logic to Case-Based and Model-Based Reasoning.” In Thomas Kuhn, edited by T. Nickles, 142–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, Joseph. 2003. “Kuhn's Philosophy of Scientific Practice.” In Thomas Kuhn, edited by T. Nickles, 101–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, Joseph. 2013. “Recovering Thomas Kuhn.” Topoi 32: 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ruphy, Stéphanie. 2010. “Are Stellar Kinds Natural Kinds? A Challenge in the Monism/Pluralism and Realism/Anti-Realism Debate.” Philosophy of Science 77: 1109–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankey, Howard. 1997. “Incommensurability: the Current State of Play.” Theoria 12: 425–445.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, Howard. 1998. “Taxonomic Incommensurability.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12: 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, Israel. 1967. Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, Yafeng. 2020. “Kuhn’s “Wrong Turning” and Legacy Today.” Synthese 197: 381–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapere, Dudley. 1966. “Meaning and Scientific Change.” In Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, edited by Robert Colodny, 41–85. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen.. 1970. “Does the Distinction between Normal and Revolutionary Science hold water?.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, edited by I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave, 39–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2007. “Kuhnian Revolutions Revisited.” Synthese 158: 61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. Brad. 2011. Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar