Duhem on Good Sense and Theory Pursuit: From Virtue to Social Epistemology

References

• Agassi, J. 1957. “Duhem Versus Galileo.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8: 237–248.
   Google Scholar
• Alfano, M., J. de Ridder, and C. Klein, eds. 2020. Social Virtue Epistemology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ariew, R. 1984. “The Duhem Thesis.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35: 313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariew, R. 2007. “Pierre Duhem.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/duhem/.
   Google Scholar
• Ariew, R., and P. Barker. 1986. “Duhem on Maxwell: A Case-Study in the Interrelations of History of Science and Philosophy of Science.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of science Association (Vol. 1986, No. 1, pp. 145–156). Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ariew, R., and P. Barker. 1992. “Duhem and Continuity in the History of Science.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46: 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baigrie, B. 1992. “A Reappraisal of Duhem’s Conception of Scientific Progress.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 182 (3): 344–360.
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S. 1990. “Creativity, Discovery, and Science Education: Kuhn and Feyerabend Revisited.” Interchange 21: 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Barseghyan, H. 2015. The Laws of Scientific Change. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barseghyan, H. 2018. “Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change.” Scientonomy: Journal for the Science of Science 2: 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Menahem, Y. 2006. Conventionalism: From Poincaré to Quine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhakthavatsalam, S. 2015. “The Rationale Behind Pierre Duhem’s Natural Classification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51: 11–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhakthavatsalam, S. 2017. “Duhemian Good Sense and Agent Reliabilism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64: 22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, D., G. Holton, and F. Rutherford. 2002. Understanding Physics. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2012. Is Water H₂O?: Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. New York City: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Çoko, K. 2015. “Epistemology of a Believing Historian: Making Sense of Duhem’s Anti-Atomism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 50: 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. 1637/1988. “Discourse on the Method.” In Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, 20–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMarco, M., and K. Khalifa. 2019. “Inquiry Tickets: Values, Pursuit, and Underdetermination.” Philosophy of Science 86: 1016–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, S. 2013. “Pierre Duhem and the Inconsistency Between Instrumentalism and Natural Classification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44: 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. 1893. “L’Ecole Anglaise et les Théories Physiques, A Propos D’un Livre de W. Thompson.” Revue des Questions Scientifiques 34: 345–378.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. 1902. Les Théories Electriques de J. Clerk Maxwell: Etude Historique et Critique. Paris: Herman.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. 1906/1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. 1908/1969. To Save the Phenomena: An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. 1991. German Science: Some Reflections on German Science/German Science and German Virtues. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, C. 2010. “Persistent Disagreement.” In Disagreement, edited by R. Feldman, and T. Warfield, 53–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K., and D. McKaughan. 2014. “Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science.” Philosophy of Science 81: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, A. 2011. “The Epistemic Value of Good Sense.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43: 139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. 1976. “On the Critique of Scientific Reason.” In Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, edited by R. Cohen, P. Feyerabend, and M. Wartofsky, 109–143. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Finocchiaro, M. 1992. “To Save the Phenomena: Duhem on Galileo.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 182 (3): 291–310.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, E. 1976. “Corpuscular Optics and the Wave Theory of Light: The Science and Politics of a Revolution in Physics.” Social Studies of Science 6: 141–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannoni, C. 1967. “Quine, Grünbaum, and the Duhemian Thesis.” Nous, 283-297.
   Google Scholar
• Gueguen, M. 2019. “On Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: Surplus Structure and Artifacts in Scientific Theories.” (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Gueguen, M., and S. Psillos. 2017. “Anti-Scepticism and Epistemic Humility in Pierre Duhem’s Philosophy of Science.” Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2: 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M. 2010. “Pierre Duhem’s Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41: 58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M., and C. Paternotte. 2013. “Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus.” Erkenntnis 78: 1109–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindi, V. 2005. “Should Science Teaching Involve the History of Science? An Assessment of Kuhn’s View.” Science & Education 14: 721–731.
   Google Scholar
• Krips, H. 1982. “Epistemological Holism: Duhem or Quine?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13 (3): 251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1977. “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” In The Essential Tension, edited by T. S. Kuhn, 320–339. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 91–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1971. “History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions.” In PSA 1971. Vol. VIII, edited by R. Buck and R. Cohen, 91–136. Dordrecht, Reidel: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, L. 2002. “History of Science in Science Education: Development and Validation of a Checklist for Analysing the Historical Content of Science Textbooks.” Science & Education 11: 333–359.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, F. 2012. “Um Estudo Sobre a Filosofia da História e Sobre a Historiografia da Ciência de Pierre Duhem.” (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• List, C. 2005. “Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 2: 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lugg, A. 1990. “Pierre Duhem’s Conception of Natural Classification.” Synthese 83: 409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiocchi, R. 1985. Chimica e Filosofia: Scienza, Epistemologia, Storia e Religione Nell’Opera di Pierre Duhem. Florence: La Nuevo Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 1987. “Saving Duhem and Galileo: Duhemian Methodology and the Saving of the Phenomena.” History of Science 25: 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 1991. Pierre Duhem: Philosophy and History in the Work of a Believing Physicist. La Salle: Open Court Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. 1972. The Pluralist and Possibilist Aspect of the Scientific Enterprise. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, L. 2012. “Experiment and Theory Building.” Synthese 184: 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigozzi, G. 2006. “Belief Merging and the Discursive Dilemma: An Argument-Based Account to Paradoxes of Judgment Aggregation.” Synthese 152: 285–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 2018. “Realism and Theory Change in Science.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-theory-change/.
   Google Scholar
• Šešelja, D., and C. Straßer. 2013. “Kuhn and the Question of Pursuit Worthiness.” Topoi 32: 9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. 2018. “A Pluralism Worth Having: Feyerabend’s Well-Ordered Science.” (Doctoral Dissertation). the University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. 2001. “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should we Take Seriously?” Philosophy of Science 68: S1–S12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. 2017. “Underdetermination of Scientific Theory.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M. 2019. “Everyday Scientific Imagination: A Qualitative Study of the Uses, Norms, and Pedagogy of Imagination in Science.” Science & Education 28: 711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stump, D. 2007. “Pierre Duhem’s Virtue Epistemology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38: 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuillemin, J. 1979. “On Duhem’s and Quine’s Theses.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 9: 69–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeking, G. 1969. “Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification.” Philosophy of Science 36: 375–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitt, L. A. 1990. “Theory Pursuit: Between Discovery and Acceptance.” Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the PSA, pp. 467–483.
   Google Scholar