References
- Bailer-Jones, Daniela. 2003. “When Scientific Models Represent.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1): 59–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590305238.
- Baker, David John. 2010. “Symmetry and the Metaphysics of Physics: Symmetry and Metaphysics.” Philosophy Compass 5 (12): 1157–1166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00361.x.
- Belot, Gordon. 2001. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” The Journal of Philosophy 98 (2): 55–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2678482.
- Belot, Gordon. 2018. “Fifty Million Elvis Fans Can’t Be Wrong.” Noûs 52 (4): 946–981. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12200.
- Brading, Katherine, and Harvey Brown. 2004. “Are Gauge Symmetry Transformations Observable?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4): 645–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.4.645.
- Cappelen, Herman, and Josh Dever. 2013. The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Contessa, Gabriele. 2007. “Scientific Representation, Interpretation, and Surrogative Reasoning.” Philosophy of Science 74 (1): 48–68.
- Dasgupta, Shamik. 2016. “Symmetry as an Epistemic Notion (Twice Over).” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3): 837–878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu049.
- Earman, John. 2002. “Thoroughly Modern McTaggart: Or, What McTaggart Would Have Said If He Had Read the General Theory of Relativity.” Philosophers’ Imprint 2: 1–28.
- Fraassen, Bas van. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Friederich, Simon. 2015. “Symmetry, Empirical Equivalence, and Identity.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3): 537–559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt046.
- Giere, Ronald. 2010a. “An Agent-Based Conception of Models and Scientific Representation.” Synthese 172 (2): 269–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9506-z.
- Giere, Ronald. 2010b. Scientific Perspectivism. Paperback ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Greaves, Hilary, and David Wallace. 2014. “Empirical Consequences of Symmetries.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (1): 59–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt005.
- Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Healey, Richard. 2009. “Perfect Symmetries.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4): 697–720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp033.
- Ismael, Jenann. 2007. The Situated Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kaplan, David. 1989. “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein, 481–563. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kosso, Peter. 2000. “The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1): 81–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/51.1.81.
- Lewis, David. 1979. “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se.” The Philosophical Review 88 (4): 513–543. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2184843.
- Massimi, Michela. 2018. “Perspectival Modeling.” Philosophy of Science 85 (3): 335–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/697745.
- North, Jill. 2009. “The ‘Structure’ of Physics: A Case Study.” Journal of Philosophy 106 (2): 57–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2009106213.
- Perry, John. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 13 (1): 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2214792.
- Roberts, John. 2008. “A Puzzle About Laws, Symmetries and Measurability.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2): 143–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axn009.
- Rovelli, Carlo. 2014. “Why Gauge?” Foundations of Physics 44 (1): 91–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-013-9768-7.
- Ruyant, Quentin. 2020. “Perspectival Realism and Norms of Scientific Representation.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (20). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00285-x.
- Ruyant, Quentin True. 2021. “True Griceanism: Filling the Gapsin Callender and Cohen’s Account of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science 88 (7): 533–553.
- Suárez, Mauricio. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3): 225–244.
- Suppes, Patrick. 1969. “Models of Data.” In Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, edited by Patrick Suppes, 24–35. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3173-7_2.
- Teh, Nicholas J. 2016. “Galileo’s Gauge: Understanding the Empirical Significance of Gauge Symmetry.” Philosophy of Science 83 (1): 93–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/684196.
- Wallace, David. 2010. “Decoherence and Ontology, or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love FAPP.” In Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality, edited by Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent, and David Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wallace, David. 2019a. “Observability, Redundancy and Modality for Dynamical Symmetry Transformations.” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18813/.
- Wallace, David. 2019b. “Who’s Afraid of Coordinate Systems? An Essay on Representation of Spacetime Structure.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67: 125–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.07.002.