Paul Feyerabend and the Dialectical Character of Quantum Mechanics: A Lesson in Philosophical Dadaism

References

• Ambrosio, Chiara. 2021. “Feyerabend on Art and Science.” In Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, edited by Karim Bschir and Jamie Shaw, 11–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, Bertolt. 1964. “A Short Organum for the Theatre.” In Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, edited by John Willett, 179–208. London: Eyre Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Matthew J. 2021. “Against Expertise: A Lesson from Feyerabend’s Science in a Free Society?” In Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, edited by Karim Bschir and Jamie Shaw, 191–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collodel, Matthew. 2016. “Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological Issues in the History of Philosophy of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57: 27–56. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curthoys, J., and W. Suchting. 1977. “Feyerabend’s Discourse Against Method: A Marxist Critique.” Inquiry 20 (1-4): 243–397. doi:10.1080/00201747708601836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, Friedrich. 2012. Dialectics of Nature. London: Wellred Books.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1958. “Complimentarity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 32: 75–104. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/32.1.75.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1961. “Niels Bohr’s Interpretation of the Quantum Theory.” In Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science: Symposia of Scientists and Philosophers, Proceedings of Section L of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1959, edited by Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell, 371–390. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1962. “Problems of Microphysics.” In Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, edited by Robert G. Colondy, 189–283. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1964. “Problems of Microphysics.” The Voice of America. Forum Philosophy of Science Series 17, Washington: U. S. Information Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1966. “Dialectical Materialism and the Quantum Theory.” Slavic Review 25 (3): 414–417. doi:10.2307/2492853
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1967. “The Theatre as an Intrument in the Criticism of Ideologies.” Inquiry 10 (1-4): 298–312. doi:10.1080/00201746708601496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. “‘Science.’ The Myth and its Role in Society.” Inquiry 18 (2): 167–181. doi:10.1080/00201747508601758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Science in a Free Society. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul.1995. Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul FeyerabendChicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1999. “Theses on Anarchism.” In For and Against Method, edited by Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend, and Matteo Motterlini, 113–118. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 2010. Against Method. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Heesen, Remco, and Liam Kofi Bright. 2021. “Is Peer Review a Good Idea?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3): 635–663. doi:10.1093/bjps/axz029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2013. “Feyerabend on Science and Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3): 407–422. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Ian James. 2016. “Feyerabend on Politics, Education, and Scientific Culture.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 57: 121–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kragh, Helge. 1999. Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, Daniel. 2021. “Feyerabend's Re-evaluation of Scientific Practice: Quatum Mechanics, Realism and Niels Bohr.” In Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, edited by Karim Bschir and Jamie Shaw, 132–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre, Paul Feyerabend, and Matteo Motterlini. 1999. For and Against Method. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. I. 1970. “Left-wing” Communism, An Infantile Disorder. Peking: Foreign Language Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V.1972. Materialism and Empiro-criticism. Peking: Foreign Language Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. 1977. Collected Works Volume 38. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, Joe. 2019. “Lenin Without Dogmatism.” Studies in Eastern European Thought 71: 99–117. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09325-6
   Google Scholar
• Preston, John. 1999. “Introduction to Volume 3.” In Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers Volume 3, edited by Paul Feyerabend and John Preston, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Jamie. 2020. “Feyerabend and Manufactured Disagreement: Reflections on Expertise, Consensus, and Science Policy.” Synthese 198: S6053–S6084. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02538-x
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Jamie. 2021. “Feyerabend, Funding, and the Freedom of Science: The Case of Traditional Chinese Medicine.” European Journal of Philosophy 11: 37. doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00361-w
   Google Scholar
• Stalin, J. 1949. Dialectical and Historical Materialism. Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing House.
   Google Scholar