Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy

References

• Alspector-Kelly, M. 2004. “Seeing the Unobservable: Van Fraassen and the Limits of Experience.” Synthese 140: 331–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, J. 2019. “Going Local: A Defense of Methodological Localism About Scientific Realism.” Synthese 196: 587–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzouni, J. 1997. “Thick Epistemic Access: Distinguishing the Mathematical from the Empirical.” Journal of Philosophy 94: 472–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzouni, J. 2004. Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciagaluppi, G. 2019. “Adaptive Empiricism.” In Lost in Physics and Metaphysics Questioni di Realismo Scientico (Istituto Lombardo Accademia di Scienze e Lettere), edited by G. M. Dariano, A. Robbiati Bianchi, and S. Veca, 99–113. doi:10.4081/incontri.2019.465.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. 2005. “Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena?” Mind 114 (454): 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. 2016. “Mathematics and Explanatory Generality.” Philosophia Mathematica, (III) 25 (2): 194–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, S. 2005. Truth: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, O. 2018. “Empiricism.” In Routledge Handbook on Scientific Realism, edited by forthcoming in Juha Saatsi, 96–107. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Lewis. 1895. “What the Tortoise Said to Achilles.” Mind 4 (14): 278–280.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 1985. “The Ontological Status of Observables: In Praise of the Superempirical Virtues.” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, edited by P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker, 35–47. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colyvan, M. 2010. “There is No Easy Road to Nominalism.” Mind 119 (474): 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens, P. 2016. A Critical Introduction to Scientific Realism. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• French, S. 2020. “Resistance is Futile!.” Metascience 29: 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. 1955. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1981. “Do We See Through a Microscope?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62: 305–322. (Reprinted in edited by P.M. Churchland and C.A. Hooker. Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a Reply by Bas C. van Fraassen, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 132–152.)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, K. D., and E. Shech. 2021. “Roles of Mitonuclear Ecology and Sex in Conceptualizing Evolutionary Fitness.” Biology & Philosophy 36: 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 1993. Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulka, A. 1996. “Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science.” Philosophy of Science 63 (Proceedings): S298–S305.
   Google Scholar
• Kusch, M. 2015. “Microscopes and the Theory-Ladenness of Experience in Bas van Fraassen’s Recent Work.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46: 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyman, J. 2007. “The Epistemology of Constructive Empiricism.” In Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, edited by B. Monton, 46–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leplin, J. 1997. A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. 1991/2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D., and C. Callender. 2004. “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.” Philosophy of Science 71: 320–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monton, B., and C. Mohler. 2017. “Constructive Empiricism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/constructive-empiricism/>.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, A. 1985. “Constructive Empiricism and Realism.” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism. Vol. 1985, edited by P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker, 197–221. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, J. 2000. “How We Know About Electrons.” In After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend; Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method, edited by R. Nola, and H. Sankey, 67–97. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, J. 2003. “A Material Theory of Induction.” Philosophy of Science 70: 647–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, J. 2014. “A Material Dissolution of the Problem of Induction.” Synthese 191: 671–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, J. D. 2021. The Material Theory of Induction. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, J. D. Manuscript. The Large-Scale Structure of Inductive Inference. https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/material_large/material_large.html.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 2020. “Resisting Scientific Anti-Realism.” Metascience 29: 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A., and F. Bouchard. 2015. “Fitness.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/fitness/>.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbottom, D. 2019a. “Review of Brad K. Wray Resisting Scientific Realism.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/resisting-scientific-realism.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbottom, D. 2019b. The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-Realism Revitalised. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saatsi, J. 2010. “Form vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Science, edited by P. D. Magnus, and J. Busch, 8–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S. 2018. Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality Through Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. 2007. “Varieties of Pluralism and Relativism for Logic.” In A Companion to Relativism, edited by S. D. Hales, 526–553. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shech, E. 2019. “Historical Inductions Meet the Material Theory.” Philosophy of Science 86 (5): 918–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shech, E. 2020. “Review of Brad K. Wray Resisting Scientific Realism.” Philosophia 48: 861–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shech, E. 2022. “Middle Path Realism and Anti-realism: Review of Timothy D. Lyons’ and Peter Vicker’s (Eds.) Contemporary Scientific Realism: The Challenge from the History of Science.” Metascience.
   Google Scholar
• Shech, E. Forthcoming. “What Powers Logical Inference.” Metascience.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, K. P. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, K. P. 2020. “Resisting Scientific Realism with or Without van Fraassen’s Darwinian Explanation.” Metascience 29: 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Teller, P. 2001. “Whither Constructive Empiricism?” Philosophical Studies 106: 123–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. 1985. “Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science.” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, edited by P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker, 245–308. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. 2001. “Constructive Empiricism Now.” Philosophical Studies 106: 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. 2004. The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. 2007. “From a View of Science to a New Empiricism.” In Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, edited by B. Monton, 337–383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, P. 2020. “Resisting Scientific Anti-Realism.” Metascience 29: 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. B. 2018. Resisting Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, K. B. 2020. “Still Resisting: Replies to my Critics.” Metascience 29: 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. 2018. An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism: Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Z. Zhangb, and H. Dang. 2004. “A Simple way to Prepare Bismuth Nanoparticles.” Materials Letters 58: 790–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar