Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People

References

• Aumann, Robert J. 1976. “Agreeing to Disagree.” The Annals of Statistics 4 (6): 1236–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagg, Samuel. 2021. “Fighting Power with Power: The Administrative State as a Weapon Against Concentrated Private Power.” Social Philosophy and Policy 38 (1): 220–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, Nathan. 2019. Knowing our Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, Richard. 2018. “The Paradox of the Democratic Prince: Machiavelli and the Neo-Machiavellians on Ideal Theory, Realism, and Democratic Leadership.” In  Politics Recovered: Realist Thought in Theory and Practice, edited by Matt Sleat, 166–193. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Rachel. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy. 2013. “Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3): 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kevin. 2020. “Higher-Order Evidence.” In  The Routledge Handbook for the Philosophy of Evidence. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, Robert E., and Kai Spiekermann. 2018. An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goudsblom, Johan. 1992. Fire and Civilization. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, David, and David Wengrow. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène. 2017. “Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology 31 (3): 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. 2014. “Higher-Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2): 314–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, Merel, and Eric Schliesser. 2014. “Private Epistemic Virtue, Public Vices: Moral Responsibility in the Policy Sciences.” In Experts and Consensus in Social Science, edited by Carlo Martini and Marcel Boumans, 275–295. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lemoine, Phillippe. December 4, 2020. “Lockdowns, Science and Voodoo Magic.” https://necpluribusimpar.net/lockdowns-science-and-voodoo-magic/.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, Maximilian, et al. 2022. “No Evidence for Nudging after Adjusting for Publication Bias.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119: 31. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073pnas.2200300119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek, S., B. Tervo-Clemmens, F. J. Calabro, et al. 2022. “Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies Require Thousands of Individuals.” Nature 603: 654–660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millgram’s. 2015. The Great Endarkenment: Philosophy for an Age of Hyperspecialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Cailin, and James Owen Weatherall. 2019. The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread. New Haven Ct.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi., and Erik M. Conway. 2011. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Peart, Sandra, and David M. Levy. 2009. The Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Richard. 2022. “Radical Epistemology, Structural Explanations, And Epistemic Weaponry.” Philosophical Studies 179 (1): 289–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, Mario J., and Glen Whitman. 2019. Escaping Paternalism: Rationality, Behavioral Economics, And Public Policy, 418. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. 1928. “Is Science Superstitious?” In Sceptical Essays, London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. 2005. “Galilean Reflections on Milton Friedman’s “Methodology of Positive Economics,” with Thoughts on Vernon Smith’s “Economics in the Laboratory”.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1): 50–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. 2013. “The Piacular, or on Seeing Oneself as a Moral Cause in Adam Smith.” In  Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Martin Lenz, Anik Waldow, 159–177. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, E. 2015. “The Separation of Economics from Virtue: A Historical-Conceptual Introduction.” Economics and the Virtues: Building a New Moral Foundation, edited by Jennifer A. Baker and Mark D. White, 141–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. 2017. Adam Smith: Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. 2019. “Synthetic Philosophy.” Biology & Philosophy 34 (2): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. 2022. “Adam Smith on Political Leadership.” In The Scottish Enlightenment: Human Nature, Social Theory and Moral Philosophy: Essays in Honour of, edited by Christopher J. Berry, 132–163. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474467346-010
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric, and Eric Winsberg. 2020. “Climate and Coronavirus: The Science Is Not the Same.” New Statesman, March 23. Accessed August 22, 2022. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/economy/2020/03/climatecoronavirus-science-experts-data-sceptics.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, George E. 2014. “Closing the Loop.” Newton and Empiricism, edited by Zvi Biener and Eric Schliesser, 262–352. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stegenga, Jacob. 2018. Medical Nihilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, George J. 1975. “The Unjoined Debate.” In The Citizen and The State: Essays on regulation, 3–4. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tullock, Gordon. [1966] 2005. “The Organization of Inquiry.” In The selected works of Gordon Tullock, edited by C. K. Rowley, Vol. 3, Chapter VII: The Backwardness of the Social Sciences, 158–159. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Winsberg, Eric. 2018. Philosophy and Climate Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar