Einstein’s Theory of Theories and Mechanicism

References

• Acuña, P. 2016. “Minkowski Spacetime and Lorentz Invariance: The Cart and the Horse or Two Sides of a Single Coin?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balashov, Y., and M. Janssen. 2003. “Presentism and Relativity.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2): 327–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, F. 2019. “Selective Realism and the Framework/Interaction Distinction: A Taxonomy of Fundamental Physical Theories.” Foundations of Physics 49 (7): 700–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H., and O. Pooley. 2001. “The Origin of the Spacetime Metric: Bells Lorentzian Pedagogyand its Significance in General Relativity, Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale”. 256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H., Pooley, O., Minkowski Space-Time: A Glorious non-Entity, Philosophy and Foundations of Physics 1 (2006) 67–89.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H., and C. Timpson. 2006. Why Special Relativity Should not be a Template for a Fundamental Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics, in: Physical Theory and its Interpretation, 29–42. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bub, J. 2000. “Quantum Mechanics as a Principle Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1): 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, J. 2004. “Why the Quantum?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2): 241–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, J. 2005. “Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information.” Foundations of Physics 35 (4): 541–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, J., and W. Demopoulos. 1974. “The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” In Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics, 92–122. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, W. 2011. “On Kinematic Versus Dynamic Approaches to Special Relativity.” Philosophy of Science 78 (5): 1097–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., et al. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., and E. McMullin. 1984. How the Laws of Physics Lie.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, R., J. Bub, and H. Halvorson. 2003. “Characterizing Quantum Theory in Terms of Information-Theoretic Constraints.” Foundations of Physics 33 (11): 1561–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Regt, H. W. 2006. “Wesley Salmon’s Complementarity Thesis: Causalism and Unificationism Reconciled?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2): 129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Dowe, P. 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction and Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. 1919. “What is the Theory of Relativity?” Ideas and Opinions (1982), 227–232.
   Google Scholar
• Felline, L. 2011. “Scientific Explanation Between Principle and Constructive Theories.” Philosophy of Science 78 (5): 989–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felline, L. 2020. “Quantum Theory is not Only About Information.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72: 256–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felline, L. 2021. “On Explaining Quantum Correlations: Causal Vs. Non-Causal.” Entropy 23 (5): 589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, F. 1999. “Einstein’s Theory of Theories and Types of Theoretical Explanation.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (2): 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1974. “Explanation and Scientific Understanding.” The Journal of Philosophy 71 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Csli Publications Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, M. 2011. “Principle or Constructive Relativity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (3): 176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennan, S. 2017. The new Mechanical Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 2009. Scientific Reason. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagar, A., and M. Hemmo. 2006. “Explaining the Unobserved—Why Quantum Mechanics Ain’t Only About Information.” Foundations of Physics 36 (9): 1295–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorson, H. 2013. “The Semantic View, if Plausible, is Syntactic.” Philosophy of Science 80 (3): 475–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G., and P. Oppenheim. 1948. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15 (2): 135–175.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D. A. and M. Giovanelli (2019). Einstein’s Philosophy of Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World. In P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, M., and S. Glennan. 2014. “On the Relation Between Quantum Mechanical and neo-Mechanistic Ontologies and Explanatory Strategies.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (3): 337–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, M. 2011. “Conservation laws in scientific explanations: Constraints or coincidences?.” Philosophy of Science 78 (3): 333–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, M. 2014. “Did Einstein really believe that principle theories are explanatorily powerless?.” Philosophy of Science 22 (4): 449–463.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. A. 1994. The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C. F. Craver. 2000. “Thinking About Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotnitsky, A. 2015. “A Matter of Principle: The Principles of Quantum Theory, Diracs Equation, and Quantum Information.” Foundations of Physics 45 (10): 1222–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, S., and S. Ioannidis. 2019. “Mechanistic Causation.” Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofia 38 (3): 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Maltrana, D., F. Benitez, and C. Soto. 2018. “A Proposal for a Coherent Ontology of Fundamental Entities.” Foundations of Science 23 (4): 705–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, F., and J. Williamson. 2007. “Interpreting Causality in the Health Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2): 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., and J. Williamson. 2011. “Epistemic Causality and Evidence-Based Medicine.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 563–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. C. 1971. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, Volume 69. University of Pittsburgh Pre.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smolin, L. 2017. “Four Principles for Quantum Gravity.” In Gravity and the Quantum, 427–450. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, F. 1977. “The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories.” The Structure of Scientific Theories 2: 1–241.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes, P. 1967. “What is a Scientific Theory?” Philosophy of Science Today, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes, P. 2002. Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, M. 2013. Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. New York USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 2011. “Mechanistic Theories of Causality.” Philosophy Compass 6 (6): 421–447.
   Google Scholar