99
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Defence of Functional Kinds: Multiple Realisability and Explanatory Counterfactuals

ORCID Icon

References

  • Barrett, D. 2014. “Functional Analysis and Mechanistic Explanation.” Synthese 191: 2695–2714.
  • Batterman, R. 2002. The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence (Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bokulich, A. 2009. “Explanatory Fictions.” In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, edited by M. Suárez, 91–109. New York: Routledge.
  • Bokulich, A. 2016. “Fiction as a Vehicle for Truth.” The Monist 99: 260–279.
  • Buckner, C. 2015. “Functional Kinds: A Skeptical Look.” Synthese 192: 3915–3942.
  • Craver, C. 2009. “Mechanisms and Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Psychology 22: 575–594.
  • Craver, C. 2014. “The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation.” In Explanation in the Special Sciences: The Case of Biology and History, edited by M. I. Kaiser, O. R. Scholz, D. Plenge and A. Hüttemann, 27–52. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Fodor, J. A. 1974. “Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).” Synthese 28: 97–115.
  • Hochstein, E. 2017. “Why One Model is Never Enough: A Defense of Explanatory Holism.” Biology & Philosophy 32: 1105–1125.
  • Hummel, J., and I. Biederman. 1992. “Dynamic Binding in a Neural Network for Shape Recognition.” Psychological Review 99: 480–517.
  • Kaplan, D., and C. Craver. 2011. “The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective.” Philosophy of Science 78: 601–627.
  • Piccinini, G., and C. Craver. 2011. “Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches.” Synthese 183: 283–311.
  • Piccinini, G., and C. Maley. 2014. “The Metaphysics of Mind and the Multiple Sources of Multiple Realizability.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Mind.
  • Putnam, H. 1967. “Psychological Predicates.” In Art, Mind, and Religion, edited by W. H. Capitan and D. D. Merrill, 37–48. Harvard University Press.
  • Rosenberg, A. 2015. “Making Mechanism Interesting.” Synthese 195: 11–33.
  • Ross, L. 2020. “Multiple Realizability from a Causal Perspective.” Philosophy of Science 87: 640–662.
  • Shapiro, L. 2004. The Mind Incarnate (Life and Mind). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Shapiro, L. 2019. “A Tale of Two Explanatory Styles in Cognitive Science.” Theory and Psychology 29: 719–735.
  • Sober, E. 1999. “The Multiple Realizability Argument Against Reduction.” Philosophy of Science 66: 42–564.
  • Sullivan, J. 2008. “Memory Consolidation, Multiple Realizations, and Modest Reductions.” Philosophy of Science 75: 501–513.
  • Teller, P. 2001. “Twilight of the Perfect Model Model.” Erkenntnis 55: 393–415.
  • Weiskopf, D. 2011a. “The Functional Unity of Special Science Kinds.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 233–258.
  • Weiskopf, D. 2011b. “Models and Mechanisms in Psychological Explanation.” Synthese 183: 313–338.
  • Weiskopf, D. 2017. “The Explanatory Autonomy of Cognitive Models.” In Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, edited by D. M. Kaplan, 44–69. Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.