Fake Research: How Can We Recognise it and Respond to it?

References

• Begley, C. Glenn, and Lee M. Ellis. 2012. “Raise Standards for Preclinical Cancer Research.” Nature 483: 531–533. doi:10.1038/483531a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, Justin B., Ian James Kidd, and Anna Leuschner. 2017. “Epistemic Corruption and Manufactured Doubt: The Case of Climate Science.” Public Affairs Quarterly 31: 165–187. doi:10.2307/44732791.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, Justin B., and Anna Leuschner. 2015. “Climate Skepticism and the Manufacture of Doubt: Can Dissent in Science be Epistemically Detrimental?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5: 261–278. doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0101-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, Alexander. 2021. Die Epistemisierung des Politischen. Wie die Macht des Wissens die Demokratie gefährdet. Stuttgart: Reclam.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2013. “Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude.” Science & Education 22: 2547–2568. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2017. “Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability.” Perspectives on Science 25: 439–464. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00249.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2018. “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent.” In Philosophy of Science – Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities (European Studies in Philosophy of Science), edited by Alexander Christian, et al., 155–169. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2020. “Agnotological Challenges: How to Capture the Production of Ignorance in Science.” In Science and the Production of Ignorance. When the Quest for Knowledge is Thwarted, edited by Janet Kourany and Martin Carrier, 59–88. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2022. “What Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like?.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53: 5–21. doi:10.1007/s10838-021-09574-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, Alexander. 2017. “On the Suppression of Medical Evidence.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 48: 395–418. doi:10.1007/s10838-017-9377-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Melo-Martín, Inmaculada. 2023. “On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. this volume.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Melo-Martín, Inmaculada, and Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt. How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derksen, Anthony A. 1993. “The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24: 17–42. doi:10.1007/BF00769513.
   Google Scholar
• DeStefano, Frank, and William W. Thompson. 2004. “MMR Vaccine and Autism: An Update of the Scientific Evidence.” Expert Review of Vaccines 3: 19–22. doi:10.1586/14760584.3.1.19. Accessed December 2, 2022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, Heather E. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values.” Philosophy of Science 67: 559–579. doi:10.1086/392855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather E. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, Ottmar, and Martin Kowarsch. 2015. “Cartography of Pathways: A New Model for Environmental Policy Assessments.” Environmental Science & Policy 51: 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2022. Trofim Lysenko.” Accessed November 24, 2022. https://www.britannica.comhttps://www.britannica.com/biography/Trofim-Lysenko
   Google Scholar
• Errington, Timothy M. Maya Mathur, Courtney Soderberg, Alexandria Denis, Nicole Perfito, Elizabeth Iorns, and Brian Nosek 2021. “Investigating the Replicability of Preclinical Cancer Biology.” eLife 10: 1–30. doi:10.7554/eLife.71601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, Dennis K. 2011. “The Vaccine-Autism Connection: A Public Health Crisis Caused by Unethical Medical Practices and Fraudulent Science.” Annals of Pharmacotherapy 45: 1302–1304. doi:10.1345/aph.1Q318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Samuel C. 2021. “How (not) to Measure Replication.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11: 1–27. doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00377-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, Matthias. 2018. “Modeling Climate Policies: The Social Cost of Carbon and Uncertainties in Climate Predictions.” In In Climate Modelling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues, edited by Elizabeth A. Lloyd and Eric Winsberg, 413–448. Cham: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Girel, Mathias. 2023. “Agnotology and Intentional Challenges.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. This volume.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Richard F. 2017. Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope, and Wastes Billions. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hillerbrand, Rafaela. 2014. “Climate Simulations: Uncertain Projections for an Uncertain World.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 45: 17–32. doi:10.1007/s10838-014-9266-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotez, Peter J. 2021. “The Antiscience Movement Is Escalating, Going Global and Killing Thousands.” Scientific American. Accessed December 2, 2022. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-antiscience-movement-is-escalating-going-global-and-killing-thousands/
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Robert. 2021. “Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 52: 389–405. doi:10.1007/s10838-020-09548-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huneman, Philippe, and Marion Vorms. 2018. “Is a Unified Account of Conspiracy Theories Possible?.” Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia 3: 247-271. Cracow University of Economics Press. Accessed December 2, 2022. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01968477/file/4-Argumenta-Philippe-Huneman-and-Marion-Vorms-Is-a-Unified-Account-of-Conspiracy-Theories-Possible%281%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intemann, Kristen, and Inmaculada de Melo-Martín. 2014. “Are There Limits to Scientists‘ Obligations to Seek and Engage Dissenters?.” Synthese 191: 2751–2765. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0414-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Kmietowicz, Z. 2010. “Wakefield is Struck Off for the "Serious and Wide-Ranging Findings Against Him".” BMJ 340: c2803–c2803. doi:10.1136/bmj.c2803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kourany, Janet A. 2011. “Integrating the Ethical Into Scientific Rationality.” In Science in the Context of Application, edited by Martin Carrier and Alfred Nordmann, 371–386. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kourany, Janet, and Martin Carrier. 2020. “Introducing the Issues.” In Science and the Production of Ignorance. When the Quest for Knowledge is Thwarted, edited by Janet Kourany and Martin Carrier, 3–25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krimsky, Sheldon. 2003. Science in the Public Interest. Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bihan, Soazig, and Iheanyi Amadi. 2017. “On Epistemically Detrimental Dissent: Contingent Enabling Factors Versus Stable Difference-Makers.” Philosophy of Science 84: 1020–1030. doi:10.1086/694002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopoldina. 2020. Coronavirus-Pandemie: Die Feiertage und den Jahreswechsel für einen harten Lockdown nutzen, 7. Ad-hoc-Stellungnahme, issued on December 8, 2020. Accessed December 2, 2022. https://www.leopoldina.org/publikationen/detailansicht/publication/coronavirus-pandemie-die-feiertage-und-den-jahreswechsel-fuer-einen-harten-lockdown-nutzen-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, Lee. 2019. The Scientific Attitude. Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, Martin. 2009. “Denialism: What is it and How Should Scientists Respond?” European Journal of Public Health 19(1): 2–4. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, David. 2008. “Manufactured Uncertainty. Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment.” In Agnotology. The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger, 90–107. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349: 1–8. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, Gordon, and David G. Rand. 2021. “The Psychology of Fake News.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert N. 2008. “Agnotology. A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and its Study).” In Agnotology. The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger, 1–33. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert N. 2011. Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reutlinger, Alexander. 2022. “When do Non-Epistemic Values Play an Epistemically Illegitimate Role in Science? How to Solve one Half of the New Demarcation Problem.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 92: 152–161. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, Jon, Sander Van Der Linden, Beth Goldberg, Steve Rathje, and Stephan Lewandowsky 2021. “Psychological Inoculation Improves Resilience Against Misinformation on Social Media.” Science Advances 8: 1–11. eabo6254. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. Accessed December 2, 2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schienke, E. W., S. Baum, N. Tuana, K. J. Davis, and K. Keller. 2011. “Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 503–523. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9209-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleichert, Hubert. 2007. Wie man mit Fundamentalisten diskutiert, ohne den Verstand zu verlieren. München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Séralini, Gilles-Eric, Emilie Clair, Robin Mesnage, Steeve Gress, Nicolas Defarge, Manuela Malatesta, Didier Hennequin, Joël Spiroux de Vendômois 2012. “Long Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 50: 4221–4231. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Pat. 2017. “Lysenko’s ‘Michurinism’ and Art at the Moscow Darwin Museum 1935–1964.” In The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon. Volume 1. Genetics and Agriculture in the Soviet Union and Beyond, edited by William deJong-Lambert and Nikolai Krementsov, 129–175. Cham: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, Sander, Edward Maibach, John Cook, Anthony Leiserowitz, and Stephan Lewandowsky 2017. “Inoculating Against Misinformation.” Science 358: 1141–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2010. “Scientific Freedom: Its Grounds and Their Limitations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 174–181. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, John. 2002. “The Continuing Need for Disinterested Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 397–399. doi:10.1007/s11948-002-0060-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, John. 2003. “Non-Instrumental Roles of Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 17–27. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0016-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar