Scientific Practices as Social Knowledge

References

• Ackermann, R. J. 1985. Data, Instruments, and Theory: A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. R. 2009. “Pragmatism After Hegel.” In Pragmatist Perspectives, edited by S. Pihlström and H. Rydenfelt, 29–40. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 86. Helsinki: Hakapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1933. The Metaphysics, Books I–IX. Greek-English Edition. English Translation by Hugh Tredennick. London: William Heinemann Ltd. and G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barbieri, M., ed. 2007. Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 1974. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. R., and P. M. S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald, J. 1995. Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1994. “Fundamentalism vs. the Patchwork of Laws.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94: 279–292. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/94.1.279.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2012. Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. 1981. “Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.” Social Studies of Science 11: 3–10. doi:10.1177/030631278101100101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, A. 2018. Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist's Guide to the Historical Sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910) 1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916a. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916b. Essays in Experimental Logic. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1920. Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1925) 1929a. Experience and Nature. 2nd revised ed. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1929b. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1934) 1980. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1941. “Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 38: 169–186. doi:10.2307/2017978.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., and J. H. Tufts. (1908/32) 1959. Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, P. (1906) 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1975 2010). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. 1986. The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. 1987. The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. 1879. Begriffschrift: Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Verlag von Louis Nebert.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch matematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: Verlag von Wilhelm Koebner.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik C: 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. 1992. “Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by A. Pickering, 390–428. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. 1987. How Experiments End. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. 1997. Image and Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. 2006. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, D. 1990. Experiment and the Making of Meaning. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, D., T. Pinch, and S. Schaffer, eds. 1989. The Uses of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heelan, P. 1983. Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, L. A. (1990) 1992. John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, L. A. 2009. “Truth Deflationism, Technology, and Classical Pragmatism.” In Pragmatist Perspectives, edited by S. Pihlström and H. Rydenfelt, 53–67. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 86. Helsinki: Hakapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1947) 2004. Eclipse of Reason. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1900) 1975. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Edited by E. Holenstein. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (Husserliana Band XVIII).
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1901) 1984a. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Erster Teil: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Edited by U. Panzer. Dordrecht: Springer. (Husserliana Band XIX/1).
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1901) 1984b. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Zweiter Teil: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Edited by U. Panzer. Dordrecht: Springer. (Husserliana Band XIX/2).
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 2002. Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil. Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuafulage der Logischen Untersuchungen. Edited by U. Melle. Dordrecht: Springer. (Husserliana Band XX/1).
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 2005. Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Zweiter Teil. Texte für die Neufassung der VI. Untersuchung: Zur Phänomenologie des Ausdrucks und der Erkenntnis. Edited by U. Melle. Dordrecht: Springer. (Husserliana Band XX/2).
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1979. Technics and Praxis: A Philosophy of Technology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1991. Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1993. Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. New York: Paragon.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1998. Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1907) 1916. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1909. The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to ‘Pragmatism’. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1781/7) 1956. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, R. E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, A. 2009. “Philosophy as Cultural Politics—Richard Rorty’s Philosophy of Politics.” In Pragmatist Perspectives, edited by S. Pihlström and H. Rydenfelt, 69–81. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 86. Helsinki: Hakapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962) 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusinen, O. W., ed. 1959. Osnovy marksizma—leninizma. uchebnoe Posobie [The Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism. A Textbook]. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2000. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. (1979) 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Isaac. 1983. “Truth, Fallibility and the Growth of Knowledge.” In Language, Logic and Method, edited by R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky, 153–174. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, J. 2021a. “Cybernetic Epistemology.” A Presentation Delivered at EFAK XVI: Estonian Annual Philosophy Conference 2021, Sep 23–24, at University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, J. 2021b. “Science as Art: A Deweyan Perspective.” In The Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2020–2021, edited by C. Nine. Accessed November 16, 2021. http://www.irish-philosophical-society.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Lindholm_Science-as-Art_IPS-2021-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, J. 2022. “The Pragmatist Basis of Material Hermeneutics.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 16. Accessed January 12, 2023. https://publications.waset.org/10012795/the-pragmatist-basis-of-material-hermeneutics.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C., and N. Marres. 2015. “Notes on Objectual Valuation.” In Making Things Valuable, edited by M. Kornberger, L. Justesen, A. K. Madsen, and J. Mouritsen, 232–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Määttänen, P. 2009. Toiminta ja kokemus: Pragmatistista terveen järjen filosofiaa [Action and Experience: Pragmatist Common Sense Philosophy]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Määttänen, P. 2015. Mind in Action: Experience and Embodied Cognition in Pragmatism. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37: 759–780. doi:10.1177/0306312706077367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment, and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2014. “The Environmental Teapot and Other Loaded Household Objects: Reconnecting the Politics of Technology, Issues and Things.” In Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion, edited by P. Harvey, E. C. Casella, G. Evans, H. Knox, C. McLean, E. B. Silva, N. Thoburn, and K. Woodward, 278–289. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2019. “As ANT Is Getting Undone, Can Pragmatism Help Us Re-Do It?” In The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, edited by A. Blok, I. Farías, and C. Roberts, 112–120. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N., and D. Stark. 2020. “Put to the Test: For a New Sociology of Testing.” The British Journal of Sociology 71: 423–443. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. MEW. Karl Marx Friedrich Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz Verlag. (46 volumes, 1956–).
   Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, I. 1999. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noё, A. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. CP. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (8 volumes. Volumes 1–6 edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 1931—5. Volumes 7–8 edited by Arthur W. Burks, 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. EP. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (2 volumes. Volume 1 edited by Nathan Houser and Christian J. W. Kloesel, 1992. Volume 2 edited by The Peirce Edition Project, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. MS. Manuscripts. In Charles Sanders Peirce Papers (MS Am 1632). Cambridge: Houghton Library, Harvard University. (1966: The Charles S. Peirce Papers, Microfilm Edition, Thirty Reels with Two Supplementary Reels Later Added. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library Photographic Service. Catalogued in Robin, Richard S. 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Also available online: http://hollis.harvard.edu/?itemid=/000602456).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S., and V. Welby. 2001. Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence Between C. S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. 2nd ed. Edited by C. S. Hardwick and J. Cook. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1958) 1962. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966) 1983. The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1934) 1953. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1988. The Materialization of Science. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1996. In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. 1938a. Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. 1938b. “On Probability and Induction.” Philosophy of Science 5: 21–45. doi:10.1086/286483.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H.-J. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, R. S. 1997. “Classical Pragmatism and Pragmatism's Proof.” In The Rule of Reason: The Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by J. Brunning and P. Forster, 139–152. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 2002. How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 2015. Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rydenfelt, Henrik. 2009. “Pragmatism and the Aims of Inquiry: Peirce, James and Two Seeds of Death.” In Pragmatist Perspectives, edited by S. Pihlström and H. Rydenfelt, 41–51. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 86. Helsinki: Hakapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, J. R. 2009. “Pragmatic Naturalism.” In Pragmatist Perspectives, edited by S. Pihlström and H. Rydenfelt, 91–106. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 86. Helsinki: Hakapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. L. 2004. “The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Signs.” In The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, edited by C. Misak, 214–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas Aquinas. (1256–9) 1918. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate, quaestio IX. Edited by A. Dyroff. Bonna: Petrus Hanstein.
   Google Scholar
• Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vehkavaara, T. 2007. “From the Logic of Science to the Logic of the Living. The Relevance of Charles Peirce to Biosemiotics.” In Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis, edited by M. Barbieri, 257–298. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vihalemm, R. 2011. “Towards a Practical Realist Philosophy of Science.” Baltic Journal of European Studies 1: 46–60.
   Google Scholar
• Vihalemm, R. 2012. “Practical Realism: Against Standard Scientific Realism and Anti-Realism.” Studia Philosophica Estonica 5: 7–22. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1055
   Google Scholar
• Vihalemm, R. 2013. “What is a Scientific Concept: Some Considerations Concerning Chemistry in Practical Realist Philosophy of Science.” In The Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologies and Concepts, edited by J.-P. Llored, 364–384. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vihalemm, R. 2015. “Philosophy of Chemistry Against Standard Scientific Realism and Anti-Realism.” Philosophia Scientiæ 19: 99–113. doi:10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1055.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorio, T. 2009. “Rorty’s Dilemma and Technology.” In Pragmatist Perspectives, edited by S. Pihlström, and H. Rydenfelt, 83–90. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 86. Helsinki: Hakapaino.
   Google Scholar
• West, D. E., and M. Anderson, eds. 2016. Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit: Before and Beyond Consciousness. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953) 2009. Philosophical Investigations. 4th revised ed. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar