Incorrigible Science and Doctrinal Pseudoscience

References

• Bäumler, G. 1994. “On the Validity of the Yerkes-Dodson Law.” Studia Psychologica 36: 205–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. P. 1965. “The Yerkes-Dodson Law Repealed.” Psychological Reports 17: 663–666. doi:10.2466/pr0.1965.17.2.663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. 2023. Scientific. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. 1962. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, S-Å. 1992. “Emotional Stress and Eyewitness Memory: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 112: 284–309. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, M. 2015. “From Law to Folklore: Work Stress and the Yerkes-Dodson Law.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 30: 741–752. doi:10.1108/JMP-03-2013-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, S., and E. Hollnagel. 2004. “Human Factors and Folk Models.” Cognition, Technology & Work 6: 79–86. doi:10.1007/s10111-003-0136-9
   Google Scholar
• Emmerich, R. (Writer/Director), and H. Kloser (Writer/Producer). 2009. 2012 [Motion picture]. In. United States: Columbia Pictures.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., and G. C. N. Ganey. 2003. “From the Inverted-U to the Extended-U: The Evolution of a Law of Psychology.” Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments 7: 5–14. doi:10.7771/2327-2937.1023.
   Google Scholar
• Hanoch, Y., and O. Vitouch. 2004. “When Less is More: Information, Emotional Arousal and the Ecological Reframing of the Yerkes-Dodson Law.” Theory & Psychology 14: 427–452. doi:10.1177/0959354304044918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. 2006. “How to Define.” Princípios: reviste de filosofia 13: 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. 2013. “Defining Pseudoscience and Science.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by M. Pigliucci, and M. Boudry, 61–78. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. 2020. “Disciplines, Doctrines, and Deviant Science.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33: 43–52. doi:10.1080/02698595.2020.1831258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. 2021. Science and Pseudo-Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, May 20. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen, I., and J. Karisto. 2022. “Demarcation without Dogmas.” Theoria 88: 701–720. doi:10.1111/theo.12395.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, John P. A. 2012. “Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 645–654. doi:10.1177/1745691612464056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunisto, M. 2007. Variation and Change in the Lexicon: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Adjectives in English Ending in -ic And –ical. Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. H. 1985. “The Experience of Arousal: A New Basis for Studying Arousal Effects in Sport.” Journal of Sports Sciences 3: 169–179. doi:10.1080/02640418508729749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Fevre, M., J. Matheny, and G. S. Kolt. 2003. “Eustress, Distress, and Interpretation in Occupational Stress.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 18: 726–744. doi:10.1108/02683940310502412.
   Google Scholar
• Letrud, K. 2019. “The Gordian Knot of Demarcation: Tying Up Some Loose Ends.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1080/02698595.2019.1618031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letrud, K., and S. Hernes. 2019. “Affirmative Citation bias in Scientific Myth Debunking: A Three-in-one Case Study.” Plos One 9, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222213.
   Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. 1973. “The Inverted-U Relationship Between Activation and Performance: A Critical Review.” In Attention and Performance, edited by Kornblum, Sylvan, Vol. 4, 155–174. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neiss, R. 1988. “Reconceptualizing Arousal: Psychobiological States in Motor Performance.” Psychological Bulletin 103: 345–366. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigliucci, M., and M. Boudry, eds. 2013. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shrihari, T. G. 2017. “Quantum Healing Approach to New Generation of Holistic Healing.” Translational Medicine 7, doi:10.4172/2161-1025.1000198.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, K. H. 1994. “Yerkes-Dodson: A Law for All Seasons.” Theory & Psychology 4: 525–547. doi:10.1177/0959354394044004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westman, M., and D. Eden. 1996. “The Inverted-U Relationship Between Stress and Performance: A Field Study.” Work & Stress 10: 165–173. doi:10.1080/02678379608256795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes, Robert M, and John D. Dodson. 1908. “The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation.” Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 18 (5): 459–482. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1550-7149.
   Google Scholar