Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research?

References

• Alter, A. L., and D. M. Oppenheimer. 2009. “Using the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 13 (3): 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., D. M. Oppenheimer, N. Epley, and R. N. Eyre. 2007. “Overcoming Intuition: Metacognitive Difficulty Activates Analytic Reasoning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (4): 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano, T., C. Rios Rojas, Y. Boum Ii, M. Calvo, and B. B. Misra. 2021. “Ten Tips for Overcoming Language Barriers in Science.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (9): 1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01137-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroga, E., and G. J. Matanguihan. 2021. “Creating Logical Flow When Writing Scientific Articles.” Journal of Korean Medical Science 36 (40): e275. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Białek, M., R. Muda, K. Stewart, P. Niszczota, and D. Pieńkosz. 2020. “Thinking in a Foreign Language Distorts Allocation of Cognitive Effort: Evidence from Reasoning.” Cognition 205:104420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boduch-Grabka, K., and S. Lev-Ari. 2021. “Exposing Individuals to Foreign Accent Increases Their Trust in What Non-Native Speakers Say.” Cognitive Science 45 (11): e13064. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., H. Quené, T. J. M. Sanders, and N. H. de Jong. 2014. “The Perception of Fluency in L1 and LX Speech.” Language Learning 64 (3): 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čavar, F., and A. E. Tytus. 2018. “Moral Judgement and Foreign Language Effect: When the Foreign Language Becomes the Second Language.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1304397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., D. Burgess, N. Vernooij, C. Solís-Barroso, A. McDermott, and S. Namboodiripad. 2021. “The Problematic Concept of Native Speaker in Psycholinguistics: Replacing Vague and Harmful Terminology With Inclusive and Accurate Measures.” Frontiers in Psychology 12:715843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipolletti, H., S. McFarlane, and C. Weissglass. 2016. “The Moral Foreign-Language Effect.” Philosophical Psychology 29 (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.993063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Circi, R., D. Gatti, V. Russo, and T. Vecchi. 2021. “The Foreign Language Effect on Decision-Making: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28 (4): 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01871-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contesi, F., and E. Terrone. 2018. “Introduction.” Philosophical Papers 47 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2018.1464729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degner, J., C. Doycheva, and D. Wentura. 2012. “It Matters How Much You Talk: On the Automaticity of Affective Connotations of First and Second Language Words.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (1): 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Maschio, N., F. Crespi, F. Peressotti, J. Abutalebi, and S. Sulpizio. 2022. “Decision-Making Depends on Language: A Meta-Analysis of the Foreign Language Effect.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921001012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2018. “Why the Dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ Is Better Than ‘Native Versus Non-Native Speaker.” Applied Linguistics 39 (2): 236–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Lago, M., and H. Matute. 2018. “Thinking in a Foreign Language Reduces the Causality Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818755326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I. 2021. Abduction, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021, Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/
   Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M. 2020. “Extending the Fluency Principle: Factors that Increase Listeners’ Processing Fluency Positively Bias their Language Attitudes.” Communication Monographs 87 (2): 158–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1663543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., and S. Goatley-Soan. 2022. “Americans’ Attitudes Toward Foreign Accents: Evaluative Hierarchies and Underlying Processes.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 43 (2): 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1735402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant, P., and N. Schmitt. 2009. “To What Extent Do L1 and LX Writers Make Use of Collocations?” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47 (2): 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007.
   Google Scholar
• Dylman, A. S., and M.-F. Champoux-Larsson. 2020. “It’s (Not) All Greek to Me: Boundaries of the Foreign Language Effect.” Cognition 196:104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnathan, R. 2021. “English is the Language of Science—but Precision is Tough as a LX Speaker.” Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00899-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faber, M., C. Mills, K. Kopp, and S. D'Mello. 2017. “The Effect of Disfluency on Mind Wandering During Text Comprehension.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24 (3): 914–919. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1153-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. 2019. “The Linguistic Disadvantage of Scholars Who Write in English as an Additional Language: Myth or Reality.” Language Teaching 52 (2): 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., O. Zika, R. D. Rogers, and G. Thierry. 2015. “Second Language Feedback Abolishes the “Hot Hand” Effect During Even-Probability Gambling.” Journal of Neuroscience 35 (15): 5983–5989. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3622-14.2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geipel, J., C. Hadjichristidis, and A.-K. Klesse. 2018. “Barriers to Sustainable Consumption Attenuated by Foreign Language Use.” Nature Sustainability 1:31–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0005-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geipel, J, C Hadjichristidis, and L Surian. 2015. “How Foreign Language Shapes Moral Judgment.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 59: 8–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 2018. “The Bias Bias in Behavioral Economics.” Review of Behavioral Economics 5 (3–4): 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, J. 2012. “A (Different) Virtue Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00567.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjichristidis, C., J. Geipel, and B. Keysar. 2019. “The Influence of L1 Language in Shaping Judgment and Choice.” Progress in Brain Research 247:253–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjichristidis, C., J. Geipel, and L. Surian. 2019. “Breaking Magic: Foreign Language Suppresses Superstition.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1371780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa, S., D. Tannenbaum, A. Costa, J. Corey, and B. Keysar. 2017. “Thinking More or Feeling Less? Explaining the Foreign-Language Effect on Moral Judgment.” Psychological Science 28 (10): 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617720944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, I., and J. L. Preston. 2013. “Disfluency Disrupts the Confirmation Bias.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (1): 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysar, B., S. L. Hayakawa, and S. G. An. 2012. “The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases.” Psychological Science 23 (6): 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, A., D. R. Shanks, J. Cock, and R. J. Tunney. 2003. “Recollection, Fluency, and the Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Artificial Grammar Learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 132 (4): 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Ari, S. 2015. “Comprehending LX Speakers: Theory and Evidence for Adjustment in Manner of Processing.” Frontiers in Psychology 5:1546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Ari, S., and B. Keysar. 2010. “Why Don’t We Believe LX Speakers? The Influence of Accent on Credibility.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (6): 1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., and M. J. Curry. 2015. “The Politics of English, Language and Uptake: The Case of International Academic Journal Article Reviews.” AILA Review 28:127–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, B., L. Sun, and J. Gu. 2017. “Effects of Ease of Retrieval on Confirmatory Information Search.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 45 (2): 309–320. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.4937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, M. A. 2014. “Writing Scientific Articles Like a L1 English Speaker: Top Ten Tips for Portuguese Speakers.” Clinics 69 (3): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2014(03)01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márquez, M. C., and A. M. Porras. 2021. “Science Communication in Multiple Languages Is Critical to Its Effectiveness.” Frontiers in Communication. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389fcomm.2020.00031/full.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, S., H. Cipolletti Perez, and C. Weissglass. 2020. “Thinking in a LX Language: A New Nudge?” Frontiers in Psychology 11:549083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone, Matthew S, and Jessica Tofighbakhsh. 2000. “Birds of a Feather Flock Conjointly (?): Rhyme as Reason in Aphorisms.” Psychological Science 11 (5): 424–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., S. Frederick, T. Burnham, J. D. Guevara Pinto, T. W. Boyer, L. J. Ball, G. Pennycook, R. Ackerman, V. Thompson, and J. P. Schuldt. 2015. “Disfluent Fonts Don’t Help People Solve Math Problems.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144:16–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., E. Navarrete, M. Ongis, E. Mello, V. Girotto, and F. Peressotti. 2020. “Foreign Language Effect in Decision-Making: How Foreign Is It?” Cognition 199:104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark, P. 1981. A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Niszczota, Paweł, Magdalena Pawlak, and Michał Białek. 2022. “Bilinguals are Less Susceptible to the Bias Blind Spot in their Second Language.” International Journal of Bilingualism: 136700692211103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13670069221110383.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, U. 2021. “Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4): 1061–1081. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, U. 2022. “What is the Function of Confirmation Bias?” Erkenntnis 87 (3): 1351–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, U. MS. “The Philosophical Debate on Linguistic Bias: Conceptual and Methodological Clarifications.”
   Google Scholar
• Pieger, E., C. Mengelkamp, and M. Bannert. 2017. “Fostering Analytic Metacognitive Processes and Reducing Overconfidence by Disfluency: The Role of Contrast Effects.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 31 (3): 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronskikh, V. 2018. “Linguistic Privilege and Justice: What Can We Learn from STEM?” Philosophical Papers 47 (1): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2018.1429739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Castañeda, V. 2020. “Disadvantages in Preparing and Publishing Scientific Papers Caused by the Dominance of the English Language in Science: The Case of Colombian Researchers in Biological Sciences.” PLoS One 15 (9): e0238372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., and John D. 2002. “Are Performance Predictions for Text Based on Ease of Processing?.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (1): 69–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., and N. Schwarz. 1999. “Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth.” Consciousness and Cognition 8 (3): 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., and C. Unkelbach. 2010. “The Epistemic Status of Processing Fluency as Source for Judgments of Truth.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4): 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0039-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romero-Olivares, A. L. 2019. “Review with Care.” Science 366 (6461): 146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.366.6461.146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryffel, F., and W. Wirth. 2018. “How Perceived Processing Fluency Influences the Illusion of Knowing in Learning from TV Reports.” Journal of Media Psychology 32:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., M. Jalbert, T. Noah, and L. Zhang. 2021. “Metacognitive Experiences as Information: Processing Fluency in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making.” Consumer Psychology Review 4 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1067.
   Google Scholar
• Silbiger, N. J., and A. D. Stubler. 2019. “Unprofessional Peer Reviews Disproportionately Harm Underrepresented Groups in STEM.” PeerJ 7:e8247. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovic, M., B. Biedermann, and T. Hamamura. 2022. “Not All Bilinguals Are the Same: A Meta-Analysis of the Moral Foreign Language Effect.” Brain and Language 227:105082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, P. 2019. “Shakespeare and the English Poets: The Influence of L1 Speaking English Reviewers on the Acceptance of Journal Articles.” Publications 7:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, A., R. Wu, and F. R. Kardes. 2019. “Faded Fonts: How Difficulty in Image Processing Promotes Sensitivity to Missing Information.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2019.v1.i2.a37.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. 2002. “The Passionate Scientist: Emotion in Scientific Cognition.” In The Cognitive Basis of Science, edited by P. Carruthers, S. Stich, and M. Siegal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, Y. 2022. “As a LX Speaker, I Struggled to Write Scientific Papers in English. Here’s How I Learned.” Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/nonL1-speaker-i-struggled-write-scientific-papers-english-here-s-how-i-learned.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vives, M. L., M. Aparici, and A. Costa. 2018. “The Limits of the Foreign Language Effect on Decision-Making: The Case of the Outcome Bias and the Representativeness Heuristic.” PLoS One 13 (9): e0203528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., H. Bilandzic, N. Schwarz, and J. J. Brooks. 2020. “Metacognitive Approach to Narrative Persuasion: The Desirable and Undesirable Consequences of Narrative Disfluency.” Media Psychology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1789477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., and Lisa D. W. 1998. “Why Do Strangers Feel Familiar, but Friends Don't? A Discrepancy-Attribution Account of Feelings of Familiarity.” Acta Psychologica 98 (2-3): 141–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00040-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, C. 2019. “Rude Paper Reviews are Pervasive and Sometimes Harmful, Study Finds.” Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/rude-paper-reviews-are-pervasive-and-sometimes-harmful-study-finds.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, G. 2016. “Globalized Parochialism: Consequences of English As Lingua Franca in Philosophy of Science.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2015.1119420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolston, C., and J. Osório. 2019. “When English is not Your Mother Tongue.” Nature 570 (7760): 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01797-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woumans, E., I. Van der Cruyssen, and W. Duyck. 2020. “Crime and Punishment: Morality Judgment in a Foreign Language.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149:1597–1602. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H., Z. Zhou, and Q. Liu. 2018. “Null Effects of Perceptual Disfluency on Learning Outcomes in a Text-Based Educational Context: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Psychological Review 30 (3): 745–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9442-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar