The effects of traumatic brain injury on reporting and responding to causal relations: an investigation of sensitivity to reinforcement contingencies

References

• LEZAK, M.: Neuropsychological Assessment, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press), 1995.
   Google Scholar
• HEATON, R. K., CHELUNE,TALLEY, J. L. et al.: Wisconsin Card Sorting Task manual: Revisedand expanded (Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources), 1993.
   Google Scholar
• LEVINE, B., STUSS, D. T., MILBERG, W. P. et al.: The effects of focal and diffuse brain damage on strategy application: evidence from focal lesions, traumatic brain injury and normal aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4: 247–264,1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A L-ADAWI, S p OWELL, j. H. and GREENWOOD,Motivational deficits after brain injury: aneuropsychological approach using new assessment techniques. Neuropsychology, 12: 115–124, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSCAR-BERMAN, M., M cN AMARA, P. and FREEDMAN, M.: Delayed-response tasks: parallels between experimental ablation studies and findings in patients with frontal lesions. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg and A. L. Benton (editors) Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 230–255,1991.
   Google Scholar
• POWELL, J. H., A L-A DAWI, S., M ORGAN, .1. et al.: Motivational deficits after brain injury: effects of bromocriptine in 11 patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 60: 416–421, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• ROLLS, E. T., HORNAK, J., WADE, D. et al.: Emotion-related learning in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal lobe damage. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 54: 1518–1524,1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILLIAMSON, D.J.G., SCOTT, G. and ADAMS, R. L.: Traumatic brain injury. In R. L. Adams, 0. A. Parsons, J. L. Culbertson et al. (editors) Neuropsychology for Clinical Practice (Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association), pp. 9–64,1996.
   Google Scholar
• MILNER, B.: Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9: 90–100, 1963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BECHARA, A., DAMASIO, A. R., DAMASIO, H. et al.: Insensitivity to future consequences follow-ing damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50: 7–15,1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAMASIO, A. R. and ANDERSON, S. W.: The frontal lobes. In K. M. Heilman and E. Valenstein (editors) Clinical Neuropsychology (New York; Oxford University Press), pp. 409–460,1993.
   Google Scholar
• DAMASIO, A. R., TRANEL, D. and DAMASIO, H. C.: Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: theory and preliminary testing. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg and A. L. Benton (editors) Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 217–229, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• DAMASIO, A. R., TRANEL, D. and D AMASIO, H.: Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 41: 81–94,1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEWLAND, M. C., YEZHOU, S., LOGDBERG, B. et al.: Prolonged behavioral effects of in utero exposure to lead or methyl mercury; reduced sensitivity to changes in reinforcement con-tingencies during behavioral transitions and in steady state. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 126: 6–15,1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MACKINTOSH, N. J.: The Psychology of Animal Learning (London: Academic Press), 1974.
   Google Scholar
• BANDURA, A.: Principles of Behavior Modification (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston), 1969).
   Google Scholar
• SKINNER, B. F.: The Behavior of Organisms (New York: Appleton-Centry-Crofts), 1938.
   Google Scholar
• PIAGET, J.: Understanding Causality (New York: Norton), 1974.
   Google Scholar
• HEIDER, F.: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (New York: Wiley), 1958.
   Google Scholar
• MAIER, S. F. and SELIGMAN, M. E. P.: Learned helplessness: theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105: 3–46,1976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REED, P.: Effect of a signaled delay between an action and outcome on human judgement of causality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B: 81–100,1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHATLOSH, D. L., N EUNABER, D. J. and WASSERMAN, E. A.: Response-outcome contingency: behavioral and judgmental effects of appetitive and aversive outcomes with college students. Learning and Motivation, 16: 1–34, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHLUND, M. W. and PACE, G.: The experimental analysis of human operant behavior following traumatic brain injury. Behavioral Interventions, In press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Guide for the Unifonn Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation, Adult Functional Independence Measure Instrument. Version 4.0. (Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo), 1993.
   Google Scholar
• MALKNIUS, D. and STENDERuR, K.: Rancho Los Amigos Scale of Levels of Cognitive Functioning, revised (Los Angles: Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Division of Neurological Sciences, Head Trauma Service), 1974.
   Google Scholar
• NABOBS, N. A., MILLIS, S. R. and ROSENTHAL, M.: Use of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (Cognistat) in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12: 79–84, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WECHSLER, D.: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (New York: The Psychological Corporation), 1985.
   Google Scholar
• HAMMOND, L. J.: The effects of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34: 297–304, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar