Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury

References

• PONSFORD, J. and KINSELLA, G.: Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14: 822–838, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATEER, C. A. and MAPOU, R. L.: Understanding, evaluating, and managing attention disorders following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 1–16, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN ZOMEREN, A. H., BROUWER, W. H. and DEELMAN, B. G.: Attentional deficits: the riddles of selectivity, speed, and alertness. In: N. Brooks (editor) Closed Head Injury: Psychological, Social, and Family Consequences (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 74–107, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• MUSTOZ-CESPEDES, J. M., PAUL-LAPREDIZA, N. M., PELEGRIN-VALERO, C. and TIRAEu-Ustarroz, J.: Factores de pronóstico en los trauniatismos craneoencefilicos. Revista de Neurologia, 32: 351–364, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• KINSELLA, G. J.: Assessment of attention following traumatic brain injury: a review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8: 351–375, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN ZOMEREN, A. H. and BROUWER, W. H.: Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention (New York: Oxford University Press), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, D. and POSNER, M. I.: Brain imaging of attentional networks in normal and pathological states. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23: 74–93, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POSNER, M. I. and PETERSEN, S. E.: The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13: 25–42, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHALLICE, T. and BURGESS, P. W.: Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114: 727–741, 1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHALLICE, T.: From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1988.
   Google Scholar
• ANDR_ES, P. and VAN DER LINDEN, M.: Supervisory attentional system in patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23: 225–239, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STUSS, D. T. and Gow, C. A.: Frontal dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioural Neurology, 5: 272–282, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• GENNARELLI, T. A. and GRAHAM, D. I.: Neuropathology of the head injuries. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 3: 160–175, 1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PovusHocK, J. T.: Pathobiology of traumatically induced axonal injury in animals and man. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 22: 980–986, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIGLER, E. D.: The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: implications for clinical neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16: 95–131, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARCELO, F., MUIS.I0Z-CESPEDES, J. M., Pozo, M. A. and RUBIA, F. J.: Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin card sorting test. Neuropsychologia, 38: 1342–1355, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• VILKKI, J., HOLST, P., OHMAN, J., SERVO, A. and HEISICANEN, O.: Cognitive test performances related to early and late computed tomography findings after closed-head injury.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14: 518–532, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPIICMAN, J. M., DEELMAN, B. G. and VAN ZOMEREN, A. H.: Executive functioning, attention and frontal lesions in patients with chronic CHI. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22: 325–338, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STUSS, D. T., STETHEM, L. L., HUGENHOLTZ, H., PICTON, T., PIVIK, J. and RICHARD, M. T.: Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 52: 742–748, 1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLER, E. and CRUZAT, A.: A note on the effects of irrelevant information on task performance after mild and severe head injury. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20: 69–70, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MADIGAN, N. K., DELucA, J., DIAMOND, B. J., TRAMONTANO, G. and AVERILL, A.: Speed of information processing in traumatic brain injury: modality-specific factors. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15: 943–956, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPIICMAN, J. M., VAN ZOMEREN, A. H. and DEELMAN, B. G.: Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: slowness only? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18: 755–767, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, M.: The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2: 111–125, 1996.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHYTE, J., POLANSKY, M., FLEMING, M., COSLETT, H. B. and CAVALLUCCI, C.: Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 33: 797–813, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MANLY, T., ROBERTSON, I. H., GALLOWAY, M. and HAWKINS, K.: The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37: 661–670, 1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GODEFROY, O. and ROUSSEAUX, M.: Divided and focused attention in patients with lesion of the prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 30: 155–174, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARK, N. W., MOSCOVITCH, M. and ROBERTSON, I. H.: Divided attention impairments after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 37: 1119–1133, 1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZAHN, T. P. and MIRSKY, A. F.: Reaction time indicators of attention deficits in closed head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21: 352–367, 1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FERRARo, F. R.: Cognitive slowing in closed-head injury. Brain and Cognition, 32: 429–440, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRONWALL, D. and WRIGHTSON, P.: Memory and information processing capacity after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 44: 889–895, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi, P., Joxic, C., VAN DER LINDEN, M., MARLIER, N. and BUSSEL, B.: Working memory and supervisory control after severe closed-head injury. A study of dual task performance and random generation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18: 317–337, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Azouvi, P., DUFOSSE, I., ABOUSSA1D, Z., MARLIER, N. and BUSSEL, B.: Attention and processing resources after severe closed head injury: study of a random generation task. (abstract). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1: 213, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• STABLUM, F., LEONARDI, G., MAZZOLDI, M., UMILTA, C. and MoRRA, S.: Attention and control deficits following closed head injury. Cortex, 30: 603–618, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZOCCOLOTTI, P., MATANO, A., DELOCHE, G., CANTAGELLO, A., PASSADORI, A., LECLERCQ, M., BRAGA, L., CREMEL, N., PITTAU, P., R_ENOM, M., R_OUSSEAUX, M., TRUCHE, A., Fit, B. and ZIMMER/VIANN, P.: Patterns of attentional impairment following closed head injury: a collaborative European study. Cortex, 36: 93–107, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• SOHLBERG, M. M. and MATEER, C. A.: Effectiveness of an attention-training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9: 117–130, 1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YELA, M.: La significación estadistica de la estructura simple en el anilisis factorial. Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada, 92: 313–323, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• KOREN, D., SEIDMAN, L. J., HARRISON, R. H., LYONS, M. J., KREMEN, W. S., CAPLAN, B., GOLDSTEIN, J. M., FARAONE, S. V. and TSUANG, M. T.: Factor structure of the Wisconsin card sorting test: dimensions of deficit in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 12: 289–302, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPIICMAN, J. M., KIERS, H. A., DEELMAN, B. G. and VAN ZOMEREN, A. H.: Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI. Brain and Cognition, 47: 446–460, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VELTMAN, J. C., BROUWER, W. H., VAN ZOMEREN, A. H. and VAN WOLFFELAAR, P. C.: Central executive aspects of attention in subacute severe and very severe closed head injury patients: planning, inhibition, flexibility and divided attention. Neuropsychology, 10: 1–11, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOHLBERG, M. M. and MATEER, C. A.: Improving attention and managing attentional problems. Adapting rehabilitation techniques to adults with ADD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 931: 359–375, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• SALTHOUSE, T. A.: The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103: 403–428, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEVIN, H. S., O'DONNELL, V. M. and GROSSMAN, R. G.: The Galveston orientation and amnesia test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 167: 675–684, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• REITAN, R. M.: Validity of the Trail making test as an indication of organic brain damage. Perception and Motor Skills, 8: 271–276, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• HEATON, R. K., CHELUNE, G. J., TALLEY, J. L., KAY, E. G. and CURTISS, G.: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual Revised and Expanded (Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources), 1993.
   Google Scholar
• MILNER, B.: Effects of different brain lesions in card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9: 100–110, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• GRANT, A. D. and BERG, A.: A behavioral analysis of the degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38: 404–411, 1948.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HENIK, A.: Paying attention to the Stroop effect? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2: 467–470, 1996.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• STROOP, J. R.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643–662, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• ARBUTHNOTT, K. and FRANK, J.: Trail making test, part b as a measure of executive control: validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22: 518–528, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEZAK, M. D.: Neuropsychological Assessment (New York: Oxford University Press), 1995.
   Google Scholar
• SPREEN, O. and STRAUSS, E.: A Compendium of Neuropsychological Test: Administration, Norms, and Commentary (New York: Oxford University Press), 1998.
   Google Scholar
• STEVENS, J. P.: Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Science (Hillsdale: Erlbaum), 1992.
   Google Scholar
• STUSS, D. T., FLODEN, D., ALEXANDER, M. P., LEVINE, B. and KATz, D.: Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia, 39: 771–786, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TREXLER, L. E. and ZAPPALA, G.: Neuropathological determinants of acquired attention disorders in traumatic brain injury. Brain and Cognition, 8: 291–302, 1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIMPSON, A. and SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, M.: Intactness of inhibitory attentional mechanisms following severe closed-head injury. Neuropsychology, 14: 310–319, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PINEDA, D. A., MERCHAN, V., ROSSELLI, M. and ARDILA, A.: Estructura factorial de la funcion ejecutiva en estudiantes universitarios jóvenes. Revista de Neurologia, 31: 1112–1118, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GREVE, K. W., LOVE, J. M., SHERWIN, E., MATHIAS, C. W., RAMZINSKI, P. and LEVY, J.: Wisconsin card sorting test in chronic severe traumatic brain injury: factor structure and performance sub-groups. Brain Injury, 16: 29–40, 2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOONE, K. B., PONTON, M. O., GORSUCH, R. L., GONZALEZ, J. J. and MILLER, B. L.: Factor analysis of four measures of prefrontal lobe functioning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13: 585–595, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIRSKY, A. F., ANTHONY, B. J., DUNCAN, C. C., AHEARN, M. B. and KELLAm, S. G.: Analysis of the elements of attention: a neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychological Review, 2: 109–145, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZAHN, T. P., KRUESI, M. J. and RAPOPORT, J. L.: Reaction time indices of attention deficits in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19: 233–252, 1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIST, F. and COI-EN, R.: Sequential effects in the reaction times of schizophrenics: crossover and modality shift effects. In: E. R. Steinhauer, J. H. Gruzelier and J. Zubin (editors) Handbook of Schizophrenia (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 241–171, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• SHum, D. H., MCFARLAND, K., BAIN, J. D. and HUMPHREYS, M. S.: Effects of closed-head injury on attentional processes: an information-processing stage analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12: 247–264, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, M. E., MARKS, W., FAHY, J. F. and LONG, C. J.: Effects of severe closed-head injury on three stages of information processing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14: 717–737, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• KLENBERG, L., KORKMAN, M. and LAHTI-NUUTTILA, P.: Differential development of attention and executive functions in 3- to 12-year-old Finnish children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20: 407–428, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• MONCHI, O., PETRIDES, M., PETRE, V., WORSLEY, K. and DAGHER, A.: Wisconsin card sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 21: 7733–7741, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARCELO, F. and RumA, F. J.: Non-frontal P3b-like activity evoked by the Wisconsin card sorting test. Neuroreport, 9: 747–751, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• FRISTOE, N. M., SALTHOUSE, T. A. and WOODARD, J. L.: Examination of age-related deficits on the Wisconsin card sorting test. Neuropsychology, 11: 428–436, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A., CHINCOTTA, D. and ADLAM, A.: Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130: 641–657, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A. D.: Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56: 851–864, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KONISHI, S., KAWAZU, M., UCHIDA, I., KIKYO, H., ASAKURA, I. and MIYASHITA, Y.: Contribution of working memory to transient activation in human inferior prefrontal cortex during perfor-mance of the Wisconsin card sorting test. Cerebral Cortex, 9: 745–753, 1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WANG, L., KAICIGI, R. and HOSHIYAMA, M.: Neural activities during Wisconsin card sorting test — MEG observation. Cognitive Brain Research, 12: 19–31, 2001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ALLPORT, A.: Attention and control: have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In: S Komblum (editor) Attention and PeOrmance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 182–218, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A. and HITCH, G.: Working memory. In: G. A. Bower (editor) Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation (New York: Academic Press), pp. 47–90, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• PICANO, J. J., KrusmAN, L. E., HORNBOSTEL, L. K. and MOULTON, J. M.: Replication of a three component solution for common measures of attention in HIV seropositive males. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7: 271–274, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEN YISHAY, Y., PIASETSKY, E. and RATTOK, J.: A systematic method of ameliorating disorders in basic attention. In: L. Diller (editor) Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (New York: Guilford), pp. 165–181, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• ROBERTSON, I. H.: The rehabilitation of attention. In: D. T. Stuss, G. Winocur and I. H. Robertson (editors) Cognitive Neurorehabilitation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 302–313, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• FASOTTI, L., KOVACS, F., ELING, P. and BROUWER, W. H.: Time pressure management as a compensatory strategy training after closed head injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10: 47–65, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARCELO, F., PERIAIC'TEZ, J. A. and KNIGHT, R. T.: Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty. Neuroreport, 13: 1887–1892, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• BERT!, S. and SCHROGER, E.: Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evi-dence from auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17: 1119–1122, 2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAICE, A. J., MATHIAS, J. L. and CRAWFORD, J. R., Performance on the test of everyday attention and standards of tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15: 405–4221, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar