Prospective and declarative memory problems following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury

References

• Hillier SL, Hiller JE, Metzer J. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in South Australia. Brain Injury 1997;11:649–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikman SS, Machamer JE, Winn HR, Temkin NR. Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology 1995;9:80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury. A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996;10: 841–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Fenelon B, Manning ML, Hunter M. Patterns of neuropsychological impairment after severe blunt head injury. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1991;179:117–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman ME, Brouwer WH. Slow information processing after very severe closed head injury. Impaired access to declarative knowledge and intact application and acquisition of procedural knowledge. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:467–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JTL, Hadley DM, Wiedmann KD, Teasdale GM. Neuropsychological consequences of two patterns of brain damage shown by MRI in survivors of severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1995;59:328–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil E, Gordon Y, Birnstock S, Aberbuch S, Groswasser Z. Declarative and nondeclarative sequence learning tasks: Closed-head injured patients versus control participants. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001;23:207–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderploeg RD, Crowell TA, Curtiss G. Verbal learning and memory deficits in traumatic brain injury. Encoding, consolida-tion, and retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001;23:185–95.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD. The psychology of memory. In: Baddeley AD, Wilson BA, Watts FN,editors. Handbook ofmemory disorders. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 1995. pp 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tranel D, Darnasio AR. Neurobiological foundations of memory. In: Baddeley AD, Wilson BA, Watts FN, editors. Handbook of Memory Disorders. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1995. pp 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale - Third Edition. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt M. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT): A handbook (Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services), 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, Richardson S, Guynn M, Cunfer A. Aging and prospective memory. Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1995;21:996–1007.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn J. Failure of prospective memory after acquired brain damage: Preliminary investigation and suggestions for future directions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996;18:304–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis J. Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In: Brandimonte M, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory. Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. pp 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein GO, McDaniel MA. Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990;16:717–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvavilashvili L, Ellis J. Varieties of intention: Some distinc-tions and classifications. In: Brandimonte M, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory. Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996. pp 23–51.
   Google Scholar
• Shum D, Valentine M, Cutmore T. Performance of indivi-duals with severe long-term traumatic brain injury on time-, event-, and activity-based prospective memory tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1999; 21:49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Groot YCT, Wilson BA, Evans J, Watson P. Prospective memory functioning in people with and without brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2002;8:645–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Ydewalle G, Luwel K, Brunfaut E. The importance of on-going concurrent activities as a function of age in time- and event-based prospective memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1999;11:219–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisloy EL. Prospective memory and the frontal lobes. In: Brandimonte M, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory. Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996. pp 249–66.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JD, O'Reilly RC. A preliminary theory of the interactions between prefrontal cortex and hippocampus that contribute to planning and prospective memory. In: Prospective memory. Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996. pp 267–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Reading, UK: Thames Valley Test Co; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler ED. The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: Implications for clinical neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2001;16:95–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumbergs PC. Pathology. In: Reilly P, Bullock R, editors. Head Injury. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997. pp 39–88.
   Google Scholar
• Blumbergs PC, Scott G, Manavis J, Wainwright H, Simpson OA, McLean AJ. Topography of axonal injury as defined by amyloid precursor protein and the sector scoring method in mild and severe closed head injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 1995;12:565–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Amparo E, Eisenberg HM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. Journal of Neurosurgery 1987;66: 706–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias JL, Bigler ED, Jones NR, Bowden SC, Barrett-Woodbridge MP, Brown GC, Taylor BJ. Neuropsychological and information processing performance and its relationship to white matter changes following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. A preliminary study. Applied Neuropsychology, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Evans R, Marshall LF. Impaired verbal and figural fluency after head injury. Archives of General Neuropsychology 1986;1:87–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannon R, Adams P, Harrington S, Fries-Dias C, Gipson MT. Effects of brain injury and age on prospective memory self-rating and performance. Rehabilitation Psychology 1995;40:289–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella G, Murtagh D, Landry A, et al. Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10:499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche NL, Fleming JM, Shum DHK. Self-awareness of prospective memory failure in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2002;16:931–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin S, Godbut L, Braun CMJ. Strategic sequence planning and prospective memory impairments in frontally lesioned head trauma patients performing activities of daily living. Brain and Cognition 2002;48:361–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zakzanis KK. Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: Formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2001;16:653–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn J. Performance on the Tower of London test after severe head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1995;1:537–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson HE, Willison JR. National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual, 2nd edn. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edn. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Curry LM, Ivins RG, Gowen TL. Philadelphia Head Injury Questionnaire (PHIQ). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott J. Prospective/intentional memory and aging: Memory as adaptive function. In: Poon L, Rubin D, Wilson BA, editors. Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. pp 352–72.
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Straus E. Compendium of neuropsychological tests, Vol 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edn. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992;112:155–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perbal S, Couillet J, Azouvi P, Pouthas V. Relationships between time estimation, memory, attention, and processing speed in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:1599–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD, Hiorns R. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Supplement Two, 2nd edn. Suffolk, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bate AJ, Mathias JL, Crawford JR. The covert orienting of visual attention following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001;23:386–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bate AJ, Mathias JL, Crawford JR. Performance on the Test of Everyday Attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2001;15:405–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1992;14:822–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, Timmerman ME, van Zomeren AH, Deelman BG. Recovery versus retest effects in attention after closed head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1999;21:585–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, van Zomeren AH, Deelman BG. Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: Slowness only? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996;18:755–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. In: Sullivan JL, editor. Reliability and validity assessment Vol 17. Newbury Park: Sage; 1979. pp 1–70.
   Google Scholar