Cognitive structure of executive deficits in patients with frontal lesions performing activities of daily living

References

• Eustache F, Faure S. Manuel de neuropsychologie. Paris: Dunod; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fuster JM. The prefrontal cortex. New York: Raven Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Gil R. Neuropsychologie. Paris: Masson; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Fondamentals of human neuropsychol-ogy. New York: WH Freeman and Company; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Benson DF. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Tranel D, Anderson SW, Benton A. Development of concept of 'executive function' and its relationship to the frontal lobes. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V.; 1994. pp 125–48.
   Google Scholar
• Eslinger PJ, Damasio A. Severe disturbances of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR. Neurology 1985;35:1731–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel V, Grafman J, Tajik J, Gana S, Danto J. A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task. Brain 1997;120:1805–22.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein L, Bernard S, Fenwick P, Burgess P, McNeil J. Unilateral lobectomy can produce strategy application disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1993;56:274–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MF, Reed ES, Montgomery MW, Palmer C, Mayer NH. The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991;8:381–414.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Cognitive impairment and fonc-tional disability in absence of psychiatric diagnosis. Psychological Medicine 1991;21:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbout L, Doyon J. Mental representation of knowledge following frontal-lobe or postrolandic lesions. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:1671–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafman J, Sirigu A, Spector L, Hendler J. Damage to the prefrontal cortex leads to decomposition of structured event complexes. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8:73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice T, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain 1991;114: 727–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker MBA. Review of the ecological validity of neuropsy-chological tests. In: Tupper DE, Cicerone KD, editors. The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990. pp 19–55.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz MF, Montgomery MW, Buxbaum LJ, Lee SS, Carew TG, Coslett HB. Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. Neuropsychology 1998;12:13–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meacham JA, Leiman B. Remembering to perform future actions. In: Neisser U, editor. Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: Freeman; 1982. pp 327–36.
   Google Scholar
• Meacham JA, Singer J. Incentive in prospective remembering. Journal of Psychology 1977;97:191–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins AJ, Baddeley AD. Remembering to recall in everyday life: An approach to adsentmindedness. In: Gruneberg MM, Morris PE, Sykes RN, editors. Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Chichester: Wiley; 1978. pp 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd E. Some observations on prospective remembering. In: Gruneberg MM, Morris PE, Sykes RN, editors. Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Chichester: Wiley; 1978. pp 348–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn J. Failure of prospective memory after acquired brain damage: Preliminary investigation and suggestions for future directions. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1996;18:304–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda J, Fujfi T, Yamadori A, Kawashima R, Tsukiura T, Fukatsu R. Participation of the prefrontal cortices in prospective memory: Evidence from a PET study in humans. Neuroscience Letters 1998;253:127–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissiachi PS. The neuropsychological approach in the study of prospective memory. In: Brandimonte M, Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, editors. Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1996. pp 297–318.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Glisky EL, Guynn MJ, Routhieaux BC. Prospective memory: A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychology 1999;13:103–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro JK, Shapiro LR, Russell S, Alper JS. A role for executive processes in prospective remembering. Brain and Cognition 1998;37:175–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crovitz HF, Daniel WF. Measurements of everyday memory: Toward the prevention of forgetting. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1984;22:413–4.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh RL,, Hicks JL, Landau JD. An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory and Cognition 1998;26:633–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Aging and prospective memory: Basic findings and practical applications. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities 1992;1:23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Terry WS. Everyday forgetting: Data from diary study. Psychological Reports 1988;62:299–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek MD, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Injury 2000;14:455–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella G, Murtagh D, Landry A, Homfray K, Hammond M, O'Beirne L. Everyday memory following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996;10:499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum D, Valentine M, Cutmore T. Performance of indivi-duals with severe long-term traumatic brain injury on time-, event-, and activity-based prospective memory tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1999;21:49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Della Salla S. Working memory and executive control. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London Biological Science 1996;351:1397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Esposito M, Detre JA, Alsop DC, Shin RK, Atlas S, Grossman M. The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature 1995;378:279–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EE, Jonides J. Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology 1997;33:5–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Della Salla S, Papagano C, Spinnler H. Dual-task performance in dysexecutive and nondysexecutive patients with a frontal lesion. Neuropsychology 1997;11:187–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Sala S, Baddeley A, Papagano C, Spinnler H. Dual-task paradigm: A means to examine the central executive. Annals of NewYork Academy Sciences 1995;769:161–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman A, Pickering R1\4, Wilson BA. Is there a central executive deficit after severe head injury? Clinical Rehabilitation 1992;6:133–40.
   Google Scholar
• Leclercq M, Couillet J, Azouvi P, Marlier N, Martin Y, Strypstein E. Dual task performance after severe diffuse traumatic brain injury or vascular prefrontal damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2000;22: 339–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell S, Whyte J, D'Esposito M. Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:1341–53.
   Google Scholar
• Stablum F, Leonardi G, Mazzoldi M, Umilta C, Morra S. Attention and control deficits following closed head injury. Cortex 1994;30:603–18.
   Google Scholar
• Stablum F, Mogentale C, Utmilta C. Executive functioning following mild closed head injury. Cortex 1996;32:261–78.
   Google Scholar
• Veltman JC, Brouwer WH, Van Zomeren AH, van Wolffelaar PC. Central executive aspects of attention in subacute severe and very severe closed head injury patients: Planning, inhibition,flexibility,anddividedattention.Neuropsychology 1996;10:357–67.
   Google Scholar
• Stablum F, Utmilta C, Mogentale C, Carlan M, Guerrini C. Rehabilitation of executive deficits in closed head injury and anterior communicating artery aneurysm patients. Psychological Research, 2000;63:265–78.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Veitch E, De Lacy Costello A, Shallice T. The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:848–63.
   Google Scholar
• Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London 1982;298: 199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Grafman J. Plans, actions and mental sets: Managerial knowledge units in the frontal lobes. In: Perecman E, editor. Integrating theory and practice in clinical neuropsychology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989. pp 93–138.
   Google Scholar
• Sirigu A, Zalla T, Pillon B, Grafman J, Agid Y, Dubois B. Selective impairments in managerial knowledge following pre-frontal cortex damage. Cortex 1995;31:301–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier S, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, van de Moortele PF, Pillon B, Grafman J. Distinct prefrontal activations in processing sequence at the sentence and script level: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:1469–76.
   Google Scholar
• Partiot A, Grafman J, Sadato N, Flitman S, Wild K. Brain activation during script event processing. Neuroreport 1996;7:761–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz ME, Montgomery MW, Fitzpatrick-Desalme EJ, Ochipa C, Coslett HB, Mayer NH. Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1995;12: 863–92.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan R1\4, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan neuropsycho-logical test battery. Tucson: Neuropsychological Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur G. A point scale performance tests revised form II. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Luria AR. Higher cortical functions. New York: Basic Books; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Chatelois J. Test Stroop révisé forme 4 couleurs-`flexibilite, Unpublished manuscript; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL, Thurstone TG. Primary mental abilities. Chicago: Science Research Associates; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised manual. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Baillargeon J. Adaptation française du 'Test 2 et 7 de Ruff', Unpublished manuscript, Université du Québec a Trois-Riviéres, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff R1\4, Allen CC. Ruff 2 and 7 selective attention test, professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin S, Godbout L, Braun CMJ. Strategic sequence planning and prospective memory deficits in frontally lesioned head trauma patients performing activities of daily living. Brain & Cognition 2002;48:361–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper R, Shallice T. Modelling the selection of routine action: Exploring the criticality of parameter values. In: Shafto MG, Largley P, editors. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1997. pp 131–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper R, Shallice T, Farringdon J. Symbolic and continuous processes in the automatic selection of actions. In: Hallam J, editor. Hybrid problems, hybrid solutions. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995. pp 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout L, Fiola M, Braun CMJ, Gagnon S. Cognitive structure and real life implementation of scripts in late adulthood. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, accepted for publication 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout L, Doyon J. Defective representation of knowledge in Parkinson's disease: Evidence from a script-production task. Brain and Cognition 2000;44:490–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbout L, Cloutier P, Bouchard C, et al. Temporal and spatial dimensions of script generation following frontal and parietal lesions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2004, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrieli JDE, Corkin S, Mickel SF, Growdon JH. Intact acquisition and long-term retention of mirror-tracing skill in Alzheimer's disease and in global amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 1993;107:899–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyckaerts C, Suarez S, Hauw JJ. Les memoires: Données clinico-pathologiques. Revue Neurologique 1998;154:S8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wise SP. The role of the basal ganglia in procedural memory. The Neurosciences 1996;8:39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Poldrack RA, Prabhakaran V, Seger CA, Gabrieli JDE. Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. Neuropsychology 1999;13:564–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb B, Milner B. Performance of complex arm and facial movements after cerebral brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 1981;19:491–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn-Weiner DA, Malloy PF, Boyle PA, Marran M, Salloway S. Prediction of functional status from neuropsychological tests in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Clinical Neuropsychology 2000;14:187–95.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson MC, Fried LP, Xue QL, Bandeen-Rooke K, Zeger SL, Brandt J. Association between executive attention and physical functional performance in community-dwelling older women. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 1999;54:5262–70.
   Google Scholar
• Huppert FA, Beardsall L. Prospective memory impair-ment as an early indicator of dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1993;15: 805–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata S. Everyday memory impairment in Parkinson's disease. Rinsho Shinkeigaku, 1999;39:913–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith V, Cooper M. Non-parametric design and analysis. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press; 1973.
   Google Scholar