Assessment of anosognosia in persons with frontal lobe damage: Clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory (MPAI)

References

• Hanes A, Andrewes D, Smith D, Pantelis C. Brief assessment of executive control dysfunction: Discriminate validity and homogeneity of planning, set shift, and fluency measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1996;11:185–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman KM. Anosognosia: Possible neuropsychological mechanisms. In: Prigatano GP, Schacter DL, editors. Awareness of deficits after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. pp. 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Luria AR, Homskaya ED. Disturbances in the regulative role of speech with frontal lobe lesions. In: Warren JM, Akert K, editors. The frontal granular cortex and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1996. pp 353–71.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano G, Klonoff P. Clinical rating scale for evaluating impaired self awareness and denial disability after brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychologist 1997;12:56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss D. Disturbance of self awareness after frontal system damage. In: Prigatano GP, Schacter DL, editors. Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. pp. 111–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gialanella B, Mattitoli F. Anosognosia and extrapersonal neglect as predictors of functional recovery following right hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1992;2:169–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bogod NM, Mateer CA, MacDonold SWS. Self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of measures and their relationship to executive functions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2003;9:450–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tudel TA, Tryon WW, Purdum CM. Awareness of disability and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 1998;43:267–81.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Sala S, Papagno C, Spinnler H. Dual-task performance in disexecutive and non-disexecutive patients with a frontal lesion. Neuropsychology 1997;11:187–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford J, McKinnley W, Parker D. A handbook of neuropsychological assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Newer contributions to the neuropsychological assessment of executive functions. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993;8:24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Varney NR, Menefee L. Psychosocial and executive deficits all following closed head injury: Implications for orbital frontal cortex. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993;8:32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Baker K, Schmidt M, Heinemann A, Langley M, Miranti S. The validity of the Katz adjustment scale among people with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 1998; 43:30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano G. Impaired awareness, finger tapping, and rehabilitation outcome after brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 1999;44:145–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Schacter DL. Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Bergloff P, Levin E, High W, Oden K, Nick T. Impaired awareness and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1998;13:52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohac D, Malec J, Moessner A. Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory: Structure and validity. The Brain Injuries Journal 1997;11:469–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia G, Isquith P, Retzlaff P, Pratt B. Modeling executive functions with everyday behaviors: A unitary or fractionated system. Brain In Cognition; in press.
   Google Scholar
• Grace J, Malloy P, Stout J. The National Association of Neuropsychology Research Consortium. Assessing frontal behavioral syndromes: Reliability and validity of the frontal lobe personality scale. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1997;12–27.
   Google Scholar
• Grace J, Malloy P, Stout J. Quantitative assessment of frontal apathy: A case study utilizing the frontal lobe personality scale. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 1997;9: 672.
   Google Scholar
• Grace J, Boyle P, Zawacki P, Stout T. Frontal behavior change in chronic and acute neurological disorders. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2000;12:146.
   Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, et al. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: Study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine 2003;84:51–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkstein SE, Fedoroff PJ, Price TR, Robinson RG, et al. Denial of illness scale: A reliability and validity study. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology 1993;6:93–7.
   Google Scholar
• Malec J, Machulba M, Moessner A. Differing problem perceptions of staff, survivors, and significant others after brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997;12:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Malec J, Thompson J. Relationship of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory to functional outcome and cognitive performance measures. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1994;9:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances, and physical disabilities following traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987;2:57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Partington JE, Leiter RG. Partington's hallway test. The Psychological Service Center Bulletin 1949; 1:9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtis G. Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) manual, revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.
   Google Scholar