Neuropsychological outcome and community re-integration following traumatic brain injury: The impact of frontal and non-frontal lesions

References

• Wilson JTL. The relationship between neuropsychological function and brain damage detected by neuroimaging after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1990;4:349–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gennarelli TA. Mechanisms of brain injury. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1993;11\(suppl 1):5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. pp 171–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson AJ, Levine HS. Frontal lobe dysfunction following closed head injury. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1990;178:282–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JA. Traumatic brain injury and postconcussive syn-drome. In: Snyder PJ, Nussbaum PD, editors. Clinical Neuropsychology, A Pocket Handbook for Assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998. pp 243–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wallesch C.-W, Curio N, Kutz S, Jost S, Bartels C, Synowitz H. Outcome after mild-to-moderate blunt head injury. Effects of focal lesions and diffuse axonal injury. Brain Injury 2001;15:401–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vilkki J. Problem solving deficits after focal cerebral lesions. Cortex 1988;24:119–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallesch C.-W, Curio N, Galazky I, Jost S, Synowitz H. The neuropsychology of blunt head injury in the early postacute stage. Effects of focal lesions and diffuse axonal injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 2001;18:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzell BP, Dolinskas CA, Wiser RF, Langfitt TW. Influence of lesions detected by computed tomography on outcome and neuropsychological recovery after severe head injury. Neurosurgery 1987;20:396–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting: the role of the frontal lobes. Archives of Neurology 1963; 9:100–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Levine B, Alexander MP, Hong J, Palumbo C, Katz D. Wisconsin card sorting test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:388–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Floden D, Alexander MP, Levine B, Katz D. Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 2001;39:771–86.
   Google Scholar
• Formisano R, Schmidhuber-Eiler B, Saltuari L, Cigyani E, Birbarner G, Gerstenbrand F. Neuropsychological outcome after traumatic temporal lobe damage. Acta Neurochirurgica 1991;109:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler ED, Blatter DD, Anderson CC, Johnson SC, Gale SD, Hopkins RO, Burnett B. Hippocampal volume in normal aging and traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1997;18:11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gale SC, Johnson SC, Bigler ED, Blatter DD. Traumatic brain injury and temporal horn enlargement: correlates with tests of intelligence and memory. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology 1994;7:160–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks RA, Rapport LJ, Millis SR, Deshphande SA. Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999;80:1030–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaux JM, Masson F, Levin HS. Long-term neuropsycho-logical outcome and loss of social autonomy after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997;78:1316–20.
   Google Scholar
• Millis SR, Rosenthal M, Lourie IF. Predicting community integration after traumatic brain injury with neuropsycho-logical measures. International Journal of Neuroscience 1994; 79:165–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ross SR, Millis SR, Rosenthal M. Neuropsychological prediction of psychosocial outcome after traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology 1997;4:165–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal M. editor. The traumatic brain injury model systems of care. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, entire issue, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Benton AL, Harnsher K, De S, Varney NR, Spreen OL. Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual. New York: Oxford University Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews CG, Klove H. Instruction manual for the Adult Neuropsychology Test Battery. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Medical School; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Grant I, Matthews CG. Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery. Demographic Corrections, Research Findings, and Clinical Applications. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. The WAIS-R Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Benton AL, De Hamsher KS. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. 2nd edn. Iowa City: AJA Associates; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Rey A. L'exarnen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtis G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer J, Seel R, Marwitz J. The Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The Community Integration Questionnaire. A comparative examination. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994;73:103–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston orientation and Amnesia test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 1979;167:675–84.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 1974;ii:81–4.
   Google Scholar
• Miller GA, Chapman JP. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2001;110:40–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberty CJ. Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin 1989;105: 302–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRenzi E. Disorders of space exploration and cognition. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult Clinical Neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the Frontal Lobes. Annual Reviews of Psychology 2002;53:401–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer AY. A Guide to Adult Neuropsychological Diagnosis. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson SW, Darnasio H, Jones RD, Tranel D. Wisconsin card sorting test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1991;13:909–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack TA, Bush BA, Meythaler JM, Canupp K. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: contributions from pre-morbid, injury severity, and recovery variables. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82:300–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, Dunn VD. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. American Journal of Roentgenology 1988;150:673–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichise M, Chung DG, Wang P, Wonzinan G, Gray B, Franks W. Technetium-99m-HNIPAO SPECT, CT and MRI in the evaluation of patients with chronic traumatic brain injury: a correlation with neuropsychological performance. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1994;35:217–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly AB, Zimmerman RD, Snow RB, Gandy SE, Heier LA, Deck MD. Head trauma: Comparison of MR and CT—experience in 100 patients. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1988;9:699–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, Hurst RW, Kauder DR, Gennarelli TA, Alburger GW. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2000;15:808–9.
   Google Scholar
• Newton MR, Greenwood RJ, Britton KE, Charlesworth M, Nimmon CC, Carroll MJ. A study comparing SPECT with CT and MRI after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1992;55:92–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa T, Sekino H, Uzura M, Sakarnoto T, Taguchi I, Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi T, Yamanaka I, Oohama N, Imaki S. Comparative study of magnetic resonance and CT scan imaging in cases of severe head injury. Acta Neurochirurgica (Supplementum) 1992;55:8–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prayer L, Wimberger D, Oder W, Kramer J, Schindler E, Podreka I, Imhof H. Cranial MR imaging and cerebral 99mTc HM-PAO-SPECT in patients with subacute or chronic severe head injury and normal CT examinations. Acta Radiologica 1993;34: 593–9.
   Google Scholar
• Raininko RK. Low field magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the demonstration of posttraumatic brain abnormalities. Acta Radiologica. Supplementum 1986;369:374–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garnett MR, Cadoux-Hudson TA, Styles P. How useful is magnetic resonance imaging in predicting severity and outcome in traumatic brain injury. Current Opinion in Neurology 2001;14:753–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Tooth L. Patterns of community integration 2–5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2001;15: 747–62.
   Google Scholar