The high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Item generation

References

• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996;10: 841–848.
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford JL, Olver JH, Curran C. A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1995;9: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn B, Sullivan SJ. The identification by physiotherapists of the physical problems resulting from a mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2000;14:1063–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swathe BR, Sullivan SJ. Longitudinal profile of early motor recovery following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996;10:347–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams G, Robertson V, Greenwood K. Measuring high-level mobility after traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004;83:910–920.
   Google Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies 1991;13:50–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guttman L. A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review 1944;9:139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1989;70:857–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla AE, Shumway-Cook A. Dimensions of mobility: Defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 1999;7:7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer K, Geisler T, Moody K, et al. A community mobility assessment for adolescents with an acquired brain injury. Physiotherapy Canada 1998;50:118–122.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello V, Aroni R, Timewell E, et al. In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques and analysis. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heineman; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor relearning program for stroke. London: William Heineman; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health research. In: Mays N, Pope C, editors. Qualitative research in health care. London: BMJ; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Moore M. Group techniques for idea building. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Williams G, Goldie P. Validity of motor tasks for predicting running ability in acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2001;15:831–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connell M, George K, Stock D. Postural sway and balance testing: A comparison of normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. Gait and Posture 1998;8:136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuine TA, Greene jj, Best T, et al. Balance as a predictor of ankle injuries in high school basketball players. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine 2000;10:239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder-Powell HM, Rutherford OM. Unilateral lower-limb musculoskeletal injury: Its long-term effect on balance. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;81:265–268.
   Google Scholar
• Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77:1074–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson G, Jarnlo GB. Balance training in 70 year old women. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1991;7:121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Folio MR, Fewell FF. Peabody developmental motor scales. Allen, TX: DLM teaching resources; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Russell D, Rosenbaum P, Gowland C, et al. Gross motor function measure. 2nd ed. Toronto: McMaster University; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley N. Manual for the Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Burdon BE. The Australian developmental screening test. Sydney: Harcourt Brace & Co.; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Baer HR, Wolf SL. Modified Emory functional ambulation profile: An outcome measure for the rehabilitation of post-stroke gait dysfunction. Stroke 2001;32:973–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P. Duke mobility skills profile. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Means KM. The obstacle course: A tool for the assessment of functional balance and mobility in the elderly. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 1996;33:413–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A. Motor control: Theory and practical implications. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Pilon M, Sullivan SJ, Coulombe J. Persistent vegetative state: which sensory-motor variables should the physiotherapist measure? Brain Injury 1995;9:365–376.
   Google Scholar
• Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ, Sicotte D. Expert opinion in the identification of variables for the measurement of early recovery in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1994;8:323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale AE, Sullivan SJ, Jankowski LW, et al. Screening of health risk factors prior to exercise or a fitness evaluation of adults with traumatic brain injury: a consensus by rehabilita-tion professionals. Brain Injury 1996;10:367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seaby L, Torrance G. Reliability of a physiotherapy functional assessment used in a rehabilitation setting. Physiotherapy Canada 1989;41:264–271.
   Google Scholar
• Holden M, Gill K, Magliozzi M, et al. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Physical Therapy 1984;64:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation. New York: Uniform Data System for Medical rehabilitation Project Office, Buffalo General Hospital; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm L, et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy 1985;65:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D. The prevalence of disability among adults. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. London: HMSO; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo N, Cabot R, et al. Motor and functional recovery after stroke: accuracy of physical thera-pists' predictions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1989;70:95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Platt W, Bell B, Kozak J. Physiotherapy functional mobility profile: a tool for measuring functional outcome in chronic care clients. Physiotherapy Canada 1998;50: 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy Canada 1979;65:48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: Nimrod Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Orest MR, Blaisdell KA. Reliability testing of a timed functional performance protocol for adults with mild trau-matic brain injury. Physiotherapy Canada 2000;52:131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Novacheck TF, Stout JL, Tervo R Reliability and validity of the Gillette functional assessment questionnaire as an outcome measure in children with walking disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2000;20:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msall ME, Digaudio K, Duffy LC, et al. WeeFIM: Normative sample of an instrument for tracing functional independence in children. Clinical Pediatrics 1994;33:431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller u, Roid GH. The TIME toddler and infant motor evaluation: a standardized assessment. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenburg, Dodds, Fandal, et al. The revised Denver developmental screening test. Denver, CO: University of Colorado Medical Centre; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Powell JH, Beckers K, Greenwood RJ. Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument-the BICRO-39 scales. Brain injury community rehabilitation outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998;79: 1213–1225.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badke MB, Di Fabio RP, Leonard E, et al. Reliability of a functional mobility assessment tool with application to neurologically impaired patients: A preliminary report. Physiotherapy Canada 1993;45:15–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang PF, Moore S, Woollacott MH. Correlation between two clinical balance measures in older adults: Functional mobility and sensory organization test. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 1998;53A:M140–M146.
   Google Scholar
• Podsiadlod SR. The timed 'Up & Go': A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of American Geriatric Society 1991;39:142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989;41:304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Goldie PA, Evans OM, Bach TM. Postural control following inversion injuries of the ankle. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994;75:969–975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar