The high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Content validity and discriminability

References

• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Application to practice. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1993.?
   Google Scholar
• Task Force on Standards for Measurement in Physical Therapy for Tests and Measurements in Physical Therapy Practice. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. Physical Therapy 1991;71:589–622.?
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothstein JM. Measurement and clinical practice: Theory and application. In: Rothstein JM, editor. Measurement in physical therapy. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1985. pp 1–46.?
   Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Keith RA, Hinderer SR. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 1992;73: S3–S23.?
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Standards for educa-tional and psychological testing. Washington: APA Publication; 1985.?
   Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation. New York: Uniform Data System for Medical rehabilitation Project Office, Buffalo General Hospital; 1983.?
   Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo N, Cabot R, et al. Motor and functional recovery after stroke: Accuracy of physical thera-pists' predictions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1989;70:95–99.?
   Google Scholar
• Holden M, Gill K, Magliozzi M, et al. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: Reliability and meaningful-ness. Physical Therapy 1984;64:35–40.?
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm L, et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy 1985;65:175–180.?
   Google Scholar
• Platt W, Bell B, Kozak J. Physiotherapy functional mobility profile: A tool for measuring functional outcome in chronic care clients. Physiotherapy Canada 1998;50:47–52.?
   Google Scholar
• Brewer K, Geisler T, Moody K, et al. A community mobility assessment for adolescents with an acquired brain injury. Physiotherapy Canada 1998;50:118–122.?
   Google Scholar
• Badke MB, Di Fabio RP, Leonard E, Magolis M, Franke T. Reliability of a functional mobility assessment tool with application to neurologically impaired patients: A preliminary report. Physiotherapy Canada 1993;45:15–20.?
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer HR, Wolf SL. Modified Emory functional ambulation profile: An outcome measure for the rehabilitation of post-stoke gait dysfunction. Stroke 2001;32:973–979.?
   Google Scholar
• Means KM, Rodell DE, O'sullivan PS. Use of an obstacle course to assess balance and mobility in the elderly: A validation study. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;88–95.?
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A. Motor control: Theory and practical implications. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.?
   Google Scholar
• Tang PF, Moore S, Woollacott MH. Correlation between two clinical balance measures in older adults: Functional mobility and sensory organization test. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 1998;53A:M140–M146.?
   Google Scholar
• Seaby L, Torrance G. Reliability of a physiotherapy functional assessment used in a rehabilitation setting. Physiotherapy Canada 1989;41:264–271.?
   Google Scholar
• Duncan P. Duke mobility skills profile. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1995.?
   Google Scholar
• Means KM. The obstacle course: A tool for the assessment of functional balance and mobility in the elderly. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 1996;33:413–428.?
   Google Scholar
• Podsiadlod SR. The timed 'Up & Go': A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of American Geriatric Society 1991;39:142–148.?
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer E, Johnston TM, Chiofolo RC. Functional assessment of elderly subjects in four service settings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1981;29:433–437.?
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.?
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln N, Leaadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979;65:48–51.?
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams G, Robertson V, Greenwood K. Development of a high-level mobility scale for use in traumatic brain injury. 1st Neurological Physiotherapy Conference. Manly, NSW, Australia, 2003.?
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.?
   Google Scholar
• Wu ML, Adams RJ, Wilson MR. ACER ConQuest: Generalised item response modelling software. Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research; 1998.?
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1999;3:103–122.?
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2003;84:950–963.?
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, et al. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994;75:127–132.?
   Google Scholar
• Chang W-C, Chan C. Rasch analysis for outcome measures: Some methodological considerations. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1995;76:934–939.?
   Google Scholar
• Tepper S, Beatty P, Dejong G. Outcomes in traumatic brain injury: Self-report versus report of significant others. Brain Injury 1996;10:575–581.?
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford JL, Olver JH, Curran C. A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1995;9: 1–10.?
   Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996;10: 841–848.?
   Google Scholar
• Mackay LE, Bernstein BA, Chapman PE, et al. Early intervention in severe head injury: Long-term benefits of a formalized program. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1992;73:635–641.?
   Google Scholar
• Berger E, Leven F, Pirente N, et al. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of the literature. Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience 1999;14:93–102.?
   Google Scholar
• Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Thurman DJ. Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991. Brain Injury 1996;10: 47–54.?
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.?
   Google Scholar
• Williams G, Goldie P. Validity of motor tasks for predicting running ability in acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2001;15:831–841.?
   Google Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, et al. The Rivermead mobility index: A further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. International Disability Studies 1991;13:50–54.?
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, et al. Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 1990;45:M192–M197.?
   Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989;41:304–311.?
   Google Scholar
• Hill KD, Bernhardt J, McGann AM, et al. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: Reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiotherapy Canada 1996;Fall:257–262.?
   Google Scholar
• Pastor M, Day B, Marsden C. Vestibular induced postural responses in Parkinson's disease. Brain 1993;116: 1177–1182.?
   Google Scholar
• Newton RA. Validity of the multi-directional reach test: A practical measure for limits of stability in older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences 2001;56:M248–M252.?
   Google Scholar
• Brauer S, Burns Y, Galley P. Lateral reach: A cliinical measure of medio-lateral postural stability. Physiotherapy Research International 1999;4:81–88.
   Google Scholar