Direct clinician-delivered versus indirect family-supported rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial

References

• Kraus JF. Epidemiological features of brain injury in children: Occurrence, children at risk, causes and manner of injury, severity, and outcomes. In: Broman SH, Michel ME, editors. Traumatic head injury in children. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. pp 22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer MG, Edwards P. Outcome 1 to 3 years after severe traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. Injury 1991;22:315–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing-Cobbs L, Fletcher JM, Levin HS, et al. Academic achievement and academic placement following traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: A two-year long-itudinal study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998;20:769–781.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JE, Kelly TP. Long-term outcome of learning and memory in children following severe closed head injury. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2002;5:37–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson SW, Damasio H, Tranel D, et al. Long-term sequelae of prefrontal cortex damage acquired in early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology 2000;18: 281–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslinger PJ, Biddle KR, Grattan LM. Cognitive and social development in children with prefrontal cortex lesions. In: Krasnegor NA, Lyon GR, Goldman-Rakic PS, editors. Development of the prefrontal cortex: Evolution, neuro-biology, and behavior. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes; 1997. pp 295–335.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Chadwick O, Shaffer D, et al. A prospective study of children with head injuries. III. Psychiatric sequelae. Psychological Medicine 1981;11:63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing-Cobbs L, Barnes M, Fletcher JM, et al. Modeling of longitudinal academic scores after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004;25: 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Koskiniemi M, Kyykka T, Nybo T, et al. Long term outcome after severe brain injury in preschoolers is worse than expected. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 1995;149:249–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Max JE, Robin DA, Lindgren SD, et. al. Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: Psychiatric disorders at two years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1997;36:1595–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HG, Alden J. Age-related differences in outcomes following childhood brain insults: An introduction and overview. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1997;3:555–567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, Golge M, et al. Analysis of gait reaching and grasping in children after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physiology and Medical Rehabilitation 2003;83:424–430.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelson I, Von Went L, Lundav E, et al. Rehabilitation and follow-up of children with severe traumatic brain injury. Child's Nervous System 1996;12:460–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Taylor HG, Drotar D, et al. A prospective study of long-term caregiver and family adaptation following brain injury in children. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002;17:96–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HG, Yeates KO, Wade SL, et al. Bidirectional child family influences on outcomes of traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2001;7:755–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson VA, Catroppa C, Haritou F, et al. Predictors of acute child and family outcome following traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatric Neurosurgery 2001; 34:138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max JE, Castillo CS, Bokura H, et al. Oppositional defiant problem symptomatology after traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1998;186:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max JE, Koele SL, Lingren SD, et al. Adaptive functioning following traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injury: A controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999;79:893–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivara D3, Jaffe JM, Fay GC, et al. Family functioning and injury severity as predictors of child functioning one year following traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993;74:1047–1055.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Drotar D, et al. Pre-injury family environment as a determinant of recovery from traumatic brain injuries in school-age children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1997;3:617–630.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor HG, Yeates KO, Wade SL, et al. Influences on first-year recovery from traumatic brain injury in children. Neuropsychology 1999;13:76–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong K, Kerns KA. The assessment of parent needs following paediatric traumatic brain injury. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2003;5:149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Conoley JC, Sheridan SM. Pediatric traumatic brain injury: Challenges and interventions for families. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1996;29:662–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drotar D. Relating parent and family functioning to the psychological adjustment of children with chronic health conditions: What have we learned? What do we need to know? Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1997;22:149–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer GHS, Glang A, Nixon C, et al. A comparison of two psychosocial interventions for parents of children with acquired brain injury: An exploratory study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1994;9:38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wade SL. A family problem solving intervention for child brain injury: Initial findings. Abstract presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Orlando, FL; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Michaud L, Maines T. Putting the pieces together: Preliminary efficacy of a family problem-solving intervention for children with traumatic brain injury. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher JM, Ewing-Cobbs L, Miner M, et al. Behavioral changes after closed head injury in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990;58:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConachie H, Hug S, Munir S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of alternative modes of service provision to young children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh. The Journal of Pediatrics 2000;137:769–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann L. On the trail of process: A historical perspective on cognitive processes and their training. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS. Thought and language. Trans. A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS, Cole M. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Clancey WJ. Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno JG. The middle school mathematics through applica-tions projects group. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 1998;53:5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J. The practice of learning. In: Chaiklin S, Lave J, editors. Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive develop-ment in social context. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Singley M, Anderson JR. Transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield E, Slocum T, Nelson G. Cognitive and behavioral analyses of teaching and transfer: Are they different? In: Detterman DK, Sternberg RJ, editors. Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Westport, CT: Ablex; 1993. pp 192–257.
   Google Scholar
• Howle J. Neuro-developmental treatment approaches: Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice. Laguna Beach, CA: Neuro-Developmental Treatment Association; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ, Frensch PA. Mechanisms of transfer. In: Detterman DK, Sternberg RJ, editors. Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1993. pp 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving E, Thomson DM. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 1973;80:352–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell JH, Miller PH, Miller SA. Cognitive development. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten R, Fuchs LS, Williams JP, et al. Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabil-ities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research 2001;71:279–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson HL. Instructional components that predict treat-ment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 1999;14: 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson HL, Hoskyn M. Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 2001;16: 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley M. Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley M. Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet AP, Snow C. Reconceptualizing reading compre-hension. In: Block CC, Gambrell LB, Pressley M, editors. Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. pp 17–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham FM, Sugai G, Horner RH. Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children 2001;67:331–344.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney T, Ylvisaker M. Choice and routine: Antecedent behavioral interventions for adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995;10:67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney T, Ylvisaker M. Context-sensitive behavioral supports for young children with TBI: Short-term effects and long-term outcome. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003;18: 33–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Collaborative brain injury inter-vention: Positive everyday routines. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Context-sensitive cognitive rehabilitation: Theory and practice. Brain Impairment 2003;4:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience disability following brain injury: A review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003;18:7–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jeannett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals. Sarah scale of motor development. Brasilia: SarahLetras; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Sporns O, Edelman GM. Solving Bernstein's problem: A proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. Child Development 1993;64:960–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporns 0. Selectionist and instructionist ideas in neuro-science. International Review of Neurobiology 1994;37: 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Girolametto L, Pearce PS, Weitzman E. The effects of focused stimulation for promoting vocabulary in children with delays: A pilot study. Journal of Childhood Communication Development 1996;17:39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Girolametto L, Pearce PS, Weitzman E. Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1996; 39:1274–1283.
   Google Scholar
• Girolametto L, Sparks B, Weitzman E, et al. The effects of language intervention on the play and behaviour competencies of late talkers. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• D'Zurilla TJ. Problem-solving therapy: A social compe-tence approach to clinical intervention. New York: Springer; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Robin AL, Foster SL. Negotiating parent—adolescent conflict: A behavioral-family systems approach. New York: Guilford Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson GR. Stress: A change agent for family process. In: Garmezy N, Rutter M, editors. Stress, coping and develop-ment in children. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1988, pp 235–264.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders MR, Dadds MR, Bor W. Contextual analysis of child oppositional and maternal aversive behaviors in families of conduct-disordered and non problem children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1989;18:72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia G, Isquith P. Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004;25:135–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HG. Research on outcomes of pediatric traumatic brain injury: Current advances and future directions. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004;25:199–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar