Inference comprehension of adolescents with traumatic brain injury: A working memory hypothesis

References

• Beukelman DR, Yorkston KM. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury: Management of cognitive, language, and motor impairments. Austin, TX: (Pro-Ed); 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Committee on Health and Disability. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation guidelines. Wellington, New Zealand: ARCICHD; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Body C, Leathem J. Neuropsychological sequelae of head-injury in a New Zealand adolescent sample. Brain Injury 1997;11:565–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewing-Cobbs L, Fletcher JM, Levin HS, Iovino I, Miner ME. Academic achievement and academic placement following traumatic brain injury in children and adolescent: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998;20:769–781.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan FM, Murdoch BE. Linguistic status following closed head injury in children: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1990;4:147–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan FM, Murdoch BE. A prospective study of the linguistic skills of children with closed head injuries. Aphasiology 1993;7:503–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman SB. Cognitive-communication abilities in children with closed head injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1997;6:50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M, Barnes MA. Speech acts after mild or severe childhood head injury. Aphasiology 2000;14:391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Brain Injury 1995;9:365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell TF, Dollaghan CA. Expressive language recovery in severely brain injured children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990;55:567–586.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turkstra LS, Holland AL. Assessment of syntax after adolescent brain injury: Effects of memory on test performance. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1998;41:137–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran CA, Gillon G. Language and memory profiles of adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004;18:273–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley L. Cognitive-communicative abilities following brain injury: A functional approach. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar RT, Warr-Leeper GA, Nicholson CB, Johnson S. Elementary school teachers' use of multiple meaning expressions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1989;20:420–430.
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra LS. Language testing in adolescents with brain injury: A consideration of the CELF-3. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1999;30:132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan FM, Murdoch BE. Severe closed head injury in childhood: Linguistic outcomes into adulthood. Brain Injury 1994;8:501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinonen E, Letts C, Smith BR. Children's pragmatic communication difficulties. London: Whurr Publishers. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M. Language and the young damaged brain. In: Boll T, Bryant BK, editors. Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1989. pp 89–123.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing-Cobbs L, Fletcher JM, Levin HS, Eisenberg HM. Language functions following closed head injury in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1987;9:575–592.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Chenery HJ. Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury: Use of clinical measures. Brain Injury 1998;12:109–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley L, Jensen PJ. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1991;6:271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974;ii:81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan FM, Cremona-Meteyard S, King A. High-level linguistic disturbances subsequent to childhood closed head injury. Brain Injury 1996;10:729–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippold MA. Later language development: The school age and adolescent years. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M, Barnes MA. Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain and Language 1990;39:428–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just MA, Carpenter PA. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 1992;99:122–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King J, Just MA. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991;30:580–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter PA, Miyake A, Just MA. Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In: Gernbacher MA, editor. Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1994. pp 1075–1122.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Carpenter PA, Just MA. A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1994;11:671–717.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald MC, Just MA, Carpenter PA. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 1992;24:56–98.
   Google Scholar
• Granier JP, Robin DA, Shapiro LP, Peach RK, Zimba LD. Measuring processing load during sentence comprehension: Visumotor tracking. Aphasiology 2000;14:501–513.
   Google Scholar
• Engle RW, Cantor J, Carullo JJ. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1992;18:972–992.
   Google Scholar
• Hammill DD, Brown VL, Larsen SC, Wiederholdt JL. Test of adolescent language. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hanten G, Levin HS, Song JX. Working memory and metacognition in sentence comprehension by severely head-injured children: A preliminary study. Developmental Neuropsychology 1999;16:393–414.
   Google Scholar
• Letts C, Leinonen E. Comprehension and inferential meaning in language-impaired and language normal children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001;36:307–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon G, Ratcliff R. Inference during reading. Psychological Review 1992;99:440–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney DA, Osterhout L. Inference generation during auditory language comprehension. In: Grasser AC, Bower GH, editors. Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990. pp 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman-Blake MT, Tompkins CA. Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 2001;44:639–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran C. Language comprehension and working memory of adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Canterbury: University of Canterbury; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman MT, Tompkins CA. Inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: An analysis of conflicting results. Aphasiology 2000;14:485–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins CA, Bloise CG, Timko ML, Baumgaertner A. Working memory and inference revision in brain-damaged and normally ageing adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994;37:896–912.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daneman M, Carpenter PA. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1980;19:450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Cain K, Oakhill JV, Barnes MA, Bryant PE. Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory and Cognition 2001;29:850–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosher BA, Corbett AT. Instrument inferences and verb schema. Memory and Cognition 1982;10:531–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar