Inhibition and object relations in borderline personality traits after traumatic brain injury

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stangl D, Pfohle B, Zimmerman M. A structured interview for the DSM-III personality disorders: A preliminary report. Archives of General Psychiatry 1985; 42: 491–496
   Google Scholar
• First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL. The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders. American Psychiatric Press, Washington 1997, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson JG, Kolb JE, Austin V. The diagnostic interview for borderline patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 1981; 138: 896–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanarini MC, Gunderson JG, Frankenburg FR. The revised diagnostic interview for borderlines: Discriminating BPD from other axis II disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 1989; 3: 10–18, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Zanarini MC, Gunderson JG, Frankenburg FR. Discriminating borderline personality disorder from other axis II disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 1990; 147: 161–167, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg O. Borderline personality organization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 1967; 15: 641–685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg OT. Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Aronson, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg OT. Object-relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. Jason Aronson, New Jersey 1984
   Google Scholar
• Masterson JF. Psychotherapy of the borderline adult: A developmental approach. Brunner & Mazel;, New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Masterson JF. The real self: A developmental, self, and object relations approach. Brunner &Mazel;, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Westen D. Cognitive-behavioral interventions in the psychoanalytic psychotherapy of borderline personality disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 1991; 11: 211–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen D, Cohen RP. The self in borderline personality disorder: A psychodynamic perspective. The self in emotional distress: Cognitive and psychodynamic perspectives, ZV Segal, SJ Blatt. Guilford Press, New York 1993; 334–360
   Google Scholar
• Dymetryszyn H, Bouchard MA, Bienvenu JP. Overall maturity of object relations as assessed by the McGill object relations scale. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 1997; 61: 44–72, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TE. Measurement of object relations: A review. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 1993; 12: 19–37
   Google Scholar
• Westen D. Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment 1991; 56: 56–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen D. Towards a revised theory of borderline object relations: Contributions of empirical research. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 1990; 71: 661–693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh J, Westen D, Barends A. The assessment of complexity of representations of people using TAT and interview data. Journal of Personality 1992; 60: 809–837, et al.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray HA. Thematic apperception test manual. Harvard College, Boston 1943
   Google Scholar
• Westen D, Lohr N, Silk KR. Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A thematic apperception test analysis. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990; 2: 355–364, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard S, Hilsenroth MJ, Hibbard JK. A validity study of two projective object representations measures. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1995; 7: 432–439, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Porcerelli JH, Cogan R, Hibbard S. Cognitive and affective representations of people and MCMI-II personality psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment 1998; 70: 535–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt ES. Impulsivity: Integrating cognitive, behavioral and environmental data. The impulsive client: Theory, research and treatment, WG McCown, JL Johhson, MB Shure. American Psychiatric Association, Washington 1993; 39–56
   Google Scholar
• Nigg JT. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 2000; 126: 220–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin H, Kraus MF. The frontal lobes and traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 1994; 6: 443–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leimkuhler ME, Mesulam MM. Reversible go-no go deficits in a case of frontal lobe tumor. Annals of Neurology 1985; 18: 617–619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collette F, van der Linden M, Delrue G. Frontal hypometabolism does not explain inhibitory dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 2002; 16: 228–238, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre D, Braun CMJ, Hodgins S. Ventral frontal deficits in psychopathy: Neuropsychological test findings. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 139–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Hare RD. An event-related potential investigation of response inhibition in schizophrenia and psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry 2000; 48: 210–221, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reekum R, Links PS, Fedorov C. Impulsivity in borderline personality disorder. Biological and neurobehavioral studies of borderline personality disorder, KR Silk. American Psychiatric Press, Washington 1994; 1–22
   Google Scholar
• Van Reekum R, Conway C, Gansler D. Neurobehavioral study of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 1993; 18: 121–129, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armelius BA, Kullgren G, Renberg E. Borderline diagnosis from hospital records: Reliability and validity of Gunderson's diagnostic interview for borderlines (DIB). The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1985; 173: 32–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reekum R, Links PS, Finlayson MA. Repeat neurobehavioral study of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 1996; 21: 13–20, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemelin S, Villeneuve E. L’impulsivité associée au trouble de personnalité limite. Revue Québecoise de Psychologie 2003; 24: 195–210
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty DM, Bjork JM, Huckabee HCG. Laboratory measures of aggression and impulsivity in women with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research 1999; 85: 315–326, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochhausen NM, Lorenz AR, Newman JP. Specifying the impulsivity of female inmates with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2002; 111: 495–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond M. The psychiatry of closed head injury. Closed head injury: Psychological, social, and family consequences, N Brooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984; 148–178
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N, McKinlay W. Personality and behavioral change after severe blunt head injury—a relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1983; 46: 336–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A. Social adjustment after closed head injury: A further follow-up seven years after injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 564–568, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen IV. Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: A 10-15 year second follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1984; 47: 260–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reekum R, Bolago I, Finlayson MAJ. Psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 319–327, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard MR, Bogdany J, Uysal S. Axis II psychopathology in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 45–61, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koponen S, Taiminen T, Portin R. Axis I and II psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury: A 30 years follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1315–1321, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Personality and psychosocial consequences of brain injury. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury, GP Prigatano, DJ Fordyce, HK Zeiner. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1986; 29–50, et al., editors
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard MR, Uysal S, Kepler K. Axis I psychopathology in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1998; 13: 24–39, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances, and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 57–69
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Psychiatric aspects of head injury: Problem areas and suggested guidelines for research. Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury, HS Levin, J Grafman, HM Eisenberg. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 1987; 215–231
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal M, Christensen BK, Ross PR. Depression following traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 90–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal M. Depression after traumatic brain injury: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research model systems multicenter investigation. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 177–184, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon J, Bouchard MA, Rainville C. Differential diagnosis between borderline personality disorder and organic personality disorder; . 2004, Manuscript in preparation
   Google Scholar
• Lewis L, Rosenberg SJ. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy with brain-injured adult psychiatric patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1990; 178: 69–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A. Beck depression inventory: Manual. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas 1987
   Google Scholar
• Cardebat D, Doyon B, Puel M. Évocation lexicale formelle et sémantique chez des sujets normaux: Performances et dynamiques de production en fonction du sexe, de l’âge et du niveau d’étude. Acta Neurologica Belgium 1990; 90: 207–217, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale, 3rd ed. Psychological Corporation, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974; ii: 81–84
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston naming test, 2nd ed. Lea &Febiger;, Philadelphia 1983
   Google Scholar
• Agniel A, Joanette Y, Doyen B. Protocole Montréal-Toulouse d’Évaluation des Gnosies Visuelles—PEGV. Isbergues: L’Ortho-Édition;. 1992, et al.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale—revised. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1987
   Google Scholar
• Guttman HG, Laporte L. Entrevue diagnostique pour les troubles limites de la personnalité: Traduction du ‘Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients’. Montréal; 1993
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Text Revision, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meere J, Stemerdink N. The development of state regulation in normal children: An indirect comparison with children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology 1999; 16: 213–225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno MT. The nature of verbal impairment after closed head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1980; 168: 685–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen D. Social cognition and object relations scale (SCORS): Manual for coding TAT data (unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan. 1985
   Google Scholar
• Brooks N. Cognitive deficits after head injury. Closed head injury: Psychological, social, and family consequences, N Brooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984; 44–73
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Grossman RG, Rose JE. Long term neuropsychological outcome of closed head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1979; 50: 412–422, et al.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwinski M, Gordon WA, Bogdany J. The Beck depression inventory: Is it a suitable measure of depression for individuals with traumatic brain injury?. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1998; 13: 40–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone MH. The fate of borderline patients: Successful outcome and psychiatric practice. Guilford Press, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Witol AD, Marwitz JH. Alcohol and drug use among young persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1996; 29: 643–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozol HL. Pretraumatic personality and psychiatric sequelae of head injury. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 1945; 53: 358–364
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL. ‘It is not only the kind of injury that matters, but the kind of head’: The contribution of premorbid psychosocial factors to rehabilitation outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998; 8: 1–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilo CM, MacGlasham TH, Skidol AE. Stability and course of personality disorders: The need to consider comorbidities and continuities between axis I psychiatric disorders and axis II personality disorders. Psychiatric Quarterly 2000; 71: 291–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar