References
- Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds 1994
- Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The structure of normal human attention: the test of everyday attention. International Neuropsychology Society 1996; 2: 525–534
- Posner MI, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience 1990; 13: 25–42
- Manly T, Robertson IH, Anderson V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention for children (TEA-CH). Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds 1998
- Manly T, Anderson V, Nimmo-Smith I, Turner A, Watson P, Robertson IH. The differential assessment of children's attention: the test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch), normal sample and ADHD performance. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 2001; 42: 1065–1081
- Chan RCK. Attentional deficits in patients with closed head injuries: a further study to the discriminative validity of the test of everyday attention. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 227–236
- Chan RCK, Hoosain R, Lee TMC. Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of the test of everyday attention among normal Hong Kong Chinese: a preliminary report. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16: 900–909
- Chan RCK, Robertson IH, Crawford JR. An application of individual subtest scores calculation in the Cantonese version of the test of everyday attention. Psychology Reports 2003; 93: 1275–1282
- Chan RCK, Lai MK, Robertson IH. Latent structure of the Test of Everyday Attention in a non-clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, submitted
- Crawford JR, Sommerville J, Robertson IH. Assessing the reliability and abnormality of subtest differences on the test of everyday attention. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1997; 36: 609–617
- Bate AJ, Mathias JL, Crawford JR. Performance on the test of everyday attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychology 2001; 15: 405–422
- Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychology Bulletin 1990; 107: 238–246
- Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. SEM 1999; 6: 1–55
- Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis with readings, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 1998
- Toit S, Toit M, Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. Interative LISREL user guide. Scientific Software International, Chicago 1999
- Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software, Chicago 1999
- Cohen RM, Semple WE, Gross M, Holcom HJ, Dowling S, Nordahl TE. Functional localization of sustained attention. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology Behavior & Neurology 1998; 1: 3–20
- Pardo JV, Fox PT, Raichle ME. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature 1991; 349: 61–64
- Wilkins AJ, Shallice T, McCarthy R. Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 1987; 25: 359–365
- Yamaguchi S, Tsuchiya H, Kobayashi S. Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visual attention. Brain 1994; 117: 553–562
- Pribram KH, McGuinness D. Arousal, activation and effort in the control of attention. Psychology Review 1975; 82: 116–149
- Mesulam MM. Principles of behavioral neurology. FA Davis, Philadelphia 1985
- Stuss DT, Benson DF. The frontal lobes. Raven Press, New York 1986
- Spikeman JM, Kiers HAL, Deelman BG, van Zomeren AH. Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI. Brain Cognition 2001; 47: 446–460