The effects of mild traumatic brain injury on confrontation naming in adults

References

• Bazarian JJ, McClung J, Shah MN, Cheng YT, Flesher W, Kraus J. Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998–2000. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 85–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal M. Mild traumatic brain injury syndrome. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1993; 22: 1048–1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Report to congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: Steps to prevent a serious health problem. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Ruff R. Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 5–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander MP. Mild traumatic brain injury: Pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology 1995; 45: 1253–1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson G. Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Current Opinion on Psychiatry 2005; 18: 301–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus J, Schaffer K, Ayers K, Stenehjem J, Shen H, Afifi AA. Physical complaints, medical service use, and social and employment changes following mild traumatic brain injury: A 6-month longitudinal study. Journal of Head Injury Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 239–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins LF, Long CJ. Visual reaction time and its relationship to neuropsychological test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1996; 11: 613–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord-Maes J, Obrzut JE. Neuropsychological consequences of traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1996; 29: 609–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden ME. Mild traumatic head injury: A primer for understanding its impact on employee return to work. AAOHN Journal 1997; 45: 635–643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins A, Teasdale G, Hadley MDM, MacPherson P, Rowan JC. Brain lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in mild and severe head injuries. The Lancet 1986; 2: 445–446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, Jr, Hurst RW, Kauder DR, Gennarelli TA, Alburger GW. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1994; 15: 1583–1589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay GC, Jaffe KM, Polissar NL, Liao S, Martin KM, Shurtleff HA, Rivara JB, Winn HR. Mild pediatric traumatic brain injury: A cohort study. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 895–901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolin P. Executive memory dysfunctions following mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 68–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington DE, Malec J, Cicerone K, Katz HT. Current perceptions of rehabilitation professionals towards mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 579–586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz RT, Deluca J. Sequelae of minor traumatic brain injury. American Family Physician 1992; 46: 1491–1498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leininger BE, Gramling SE, Farrell AD, Kreutzer JS, Peck EA. Neuropsychological deficits in symptomatic minor head injury patients after concussion and mild concussion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1990; 53: 293–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallister TW, Rhodes CH, Flashman LA, Wainwright H, Simpson DA, McLean AJ. Effect of the dopamine D2 receptor T allele on response latency after mild traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1749–1751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumbergs PC, Scott G, Manavis J, et al. Staining of amyloid precursor protein to study axonal damage in mild head injury. The Lancet 1994; 344: 1055–1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon CE, Taft WC, Hayes RL. Mechanisms of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Noda Y, Nabeshima T. Involvement of activation of dopaminergic neuronal system in learning and memory deficits associated with experimental mild traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neuroscience 1997; 9: 1720–1727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander MP, Benson DF, Stuss DT. Frontal lobes and language. Brain and Language 1989; 37: 656–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Fos LA, Greve KW, Hammond JS. Assessment of executive function in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 1999; 46: 159–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicerone KD. Attention deficits and dual task demands after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1995; 10: 79–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell S, Whyte J, D’Esposito M. Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1341–1353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimer L. The human brain and spinal cord: Functional neuroanatomy and dissection guide. Springer-Verlag, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Barrow IM, Hough M, Rastatter MP, Walker M, Holbert D, Rotondo MF. Can within category naming identify subtle cognitive deficits in the mild traumatic brain injured patient?. Journal of Trauma 2003; 54: 888–897
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathias JL, Beall JA, Bigler ED. Neuropsychological and information processing deficits following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004; 10: 286–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell GS, O'Seaghdha PG. Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 1992; 42: 287–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser WR. Picture naming. Cognition 1992; 42: 61–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, UK 1987
   Google Scholar
• Levelt WJ. Speaking from intention to articulation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Martin N, Weisburg RW, Saffran EM. Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language 1989; 28: 462–485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio A. Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart, &Winston, New York 1971
   Google Scholar
• Theios J, Amrhein PC. Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Review 1989; 96: 5–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofeanu C, Kroliczk G, Goodale M, Humphrey G. Naming and grasping common objects: A priming study. Experimental Brain Research 2004; 159: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes A, Whittlesea B. Long-term semantic transfer: An overlapping-operations account. Memory and Cognition 2003; 30: 401–411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malt B, Sloman S. Conversation and convention: Enduring influences on name choice for common objects. Memory and Cognition 2004; 32: 1346–1354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmelin R, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV, Sams M. Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature 1994; 368: 463–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willison J, Tombaugh JN. Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 41–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1992; 14: 822–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan RCK. Sustained attention in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Clinical Rehabilitation 2005; 19: 188–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Wingfield A, Ward SE. Decision latencies for phonological and semantic information in object identification. Brain and Language 1999; 66: 294–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Memory and information processing capacity after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1981; 44: 889–895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton-Bayre AD, Geffen G, McFarland K. Mild head injury and speed of information processing: A prospective study of professional rugby league players. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1997; 19: 275–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segalowitz SJ, Dywan J, Unsal A. Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: An ERP study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1997; 3: 95–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmerman ME, Brouwer WH. Slow information processing after very severe closed head injury: Impaired access to declarative knowledge and intact application and acquisition of procedural knowledge. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 467–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws K. Category-specific naming errors in normal subjects: The influence of evolution and experience. Brain and Language 2000; 75: 123–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones TJ, Humphreys GW. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition 1997; 25: 18–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones TJ, Humphreys GW. Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming. Memory & Cognition 1997; 25: 606–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird H, Howard D, Franklin S. Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and Language 2000; 72: 246–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perani D, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, Gorno-Tempini M, Cappa SF, Fazio F. Word and picture matching: A PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 293–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996; 379: 649–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach C, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB. Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: A PET study. Brain 1999; 122: 2159–2170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cycowicz YM, Friedman D, Rothstein M, Snodgrass MJ. Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1997; 65: 171–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison CM, Ellis AW, Quinlan PT. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory & Cognition 1992; 20: 705–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis AW, Morrison CM. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998; 24: 515–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass JG, Yuditsky T. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996; 28: 516–536
   Google Scholar
• Laws K, Leeson V, Gale T. The effect of ‘masking’ on picture naming. Cortex 2002; 38: 137–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitkovitch M, Humphreys GW. Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It's in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991; 17: 664–680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitkovitch M, Humphreys GW, Lloyd-Jones TJ. On naming a giraffe a zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993; 19: 243–259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovich B, Henderson J. Scales of cognitive ability for traumatic brain injury. The Riverside Publishing Company, Austin, Texas 1992
   Google Scholar
• Abboud H, Sugar D. SuperLab Pro: Experimental laboratory software. Cedrus Corporation, Phoenix, AZ 2000
   Google Scholar