Psychosocial functioning after stroke: Psychometric properties of the patient competency rating scale

References

• Binder LM. Emotional problems after stroke. Stroke 1984; 15: 174–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogousslavsky J. William Feinberg lecture 2002 emotions, mood, and behaviour after stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 1046–1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J, Townend E, Kwan J, Haga K, Dennis MS, Sharpe M. Personality change after stroke: Some preliminary observations. Journal of Neurology. Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1708–1713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carota A, Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Emotions, behaviours and mood changes in stroke. Current Opinions in Neurology 2002; 15: 57–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2004–2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965; 14: 61–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use the Barthel index and modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999; 30: 1538–1541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinoff G, Ore L. The Barthel activities of daily living index: Self reporting vs. actual performance in the old-old (≥75 years). Journal of the American Geriatric Society 1997; 45: 832–836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE. SF 36 health aurvey: Manual and interpretation guide. Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care 1981; 19: 787–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 1980; 34: 281–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph C. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1998
   Google Scholar
• Borod JC, Welkowitz J, Alpert M, Brozgold AZ, Martin C, Peselow E, Diller L. Parameters of emotional processing in neuropsychiatric disorders: Conceptual issues and a battery of tests. Journal of Communication Disorders 1990; 23: 247–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ. Cognitive dysfunction and psychosocial adjustment after brain injury. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury, GP Prigatano, DJ Fordyce, HK Zeiner, JR Rouech, M Pepping, B Wood. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 1986; 96–118
   Google Scholar
• Leathem JM, Murphy LJ, Flett RA. Self- and informant-ratings on the patient competency rating scale in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 1998; 20: 694–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Behavioral limitations TBI patients tend to underestimate: A replication and extension to patients with lateralized cerebral dysfunction. Clinical Neuropsychology 1996; 10: 191–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnes P, Graffi S, Nolte ML, Carlson P, Harrick L. Coping and stress in Canadian family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 737–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauggel S, Peleska B, Bode RK. Relationship between cognitive impairments and rated activity restrictions in stroke patients. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 710–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer S, Trexler LE, Gauggel S. Awareness of activity limitations and prediction of performance in patients with brain injuries and orthopaedic disorders. Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society 2004; 10: 190–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. WHO, Geneva 1980
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Towards a common language for disablements: ICIDH. WHO, Geneva 1997
   Google Scholar
• WHO. ICIDH. 2006, Available online at: http://www3.who.int/icf/intros/ICF-Eng-Intro.pdf(Accessed 14 November 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Polland B. Consequences of disease: Testing the WHO International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) model. Social Science Medicine 2001; 53: 1261–1273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Shiel A, Asami T, Taki K, Tabuchi K. An evaluation of neurobehavioural problems as perceived by family members and levels of family stress 1–3 years following traumatic brain injury in Japan. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 172–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHOQoL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQoL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine 1998; 28: 551–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and application, RH Hoyle. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1995; 77–99
   Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum, New Jersey 2001
   Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 1990; 107: 238–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Methods 1996; 1: 130–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnaly JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory, 3rd. McGraw-Hill, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping D, Smith S. Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39) evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke 2003; 34: 1944–1950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclasss correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1973; 33: 613–619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1999; 4: 84–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter BO, Gilsbach JM. Introspective capacities in patients with cognitve deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neurosychology 1995; 17: 499–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar