Psychological adjustment and marital satisfaction following head injury. Which critical personal characteristics should both partners develop?

References

• Brooks DN, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: A relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks DN, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins P. Long-term changes in family needs after brain injury: A preliminary review. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling 1997; 3: 30–39
   Google Scholar
• Engberg AW, Teasdale TW. Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: A long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 533–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais M-C, Boisvert J-M. Psychological and marital adjustment following a traumatic brain injury (TBI): A critical review. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1223–1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlesz A, Kinsella G, Crowe S. Impact of traumatic brain injury on the family: A critical review. Rehabilitation Psychology 1999; 44: 6–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes SL, Quinn WH. Family adaptation to brain injury: Coping and psychological distress. Families, Systems, & Health 2005; 23: 186–203
   Google Scholar
• Hiott W, Labbate L. Anxiety disorders associated with traumatic brain injuries. NeuroRehabilitation 2002; 17: 345–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Brain damage is a family affair. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1988; 10: 111–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Seel RT, Gourley E. The prevalence and symptoms rate of depression after traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive examination. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 563–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronister J, Chan F. A stress process model of caregiving for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2006; 51: 190–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutterford NA, Wood RLI. Evaluating a theory of stress and adjustment when predicting long-term psychosocial outcome after brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 359–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson K, Ponsford J. Evaluation of a coping skills group following traumatic brain injury. Brain-Injury 2006; 20: 167–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Simon D, Langenbahn DM, Sherr RL, Diller L. Group treatment of problem-solving deficits in outpatients with traumatic brain injury: A randomised outcome study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003; 13: 461–488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran CA, Ponsford JL, Crowe S. Coping strategies and emotional outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison with orthopedic patients. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 1256–1274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finset A, Andersson S. Coping strategies in patients with acquired brain injury: Relationships between coping, apathy, depression and lesion location. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 887–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlowits T, McColl MA. Coping with community reintegration after severe brain injury: A description of stresses and coping strategies. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 845–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malia K, Powell G, Torode S. Coping and psychosocial function after brain injury. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 607–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AD, Stambrook M. Coping strategies and locus of control following traumatic brain injury: Relationship to long-term outcome. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 89–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore AD, Stambrook M. Cognitive moderators of outcome following traumatic brain injury: A conceptual model and implications for rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 109–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AD, Stambrook M, Peters LC. Coping strategies and adjustment after closed-head injury: A cluster analytical approach. Brain Injury 1989; 3: 171–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willer BS, Allen KM, Liss M, Zicht MS. Problems and coping strategies of individuals with traumatic brain injury and their spouses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1991; 72: 460–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomberg T, Toomela A, Pulver A, Tikk A. Coping strategies, social support, life orientation and health-related quality of life following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1181–1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciulek JF. Relationship of family coping with head injury to family adaptation. Rehabilitation Psychology 1994; 39: 215–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciulek JF. Relationship of family schema to family adaptation to brain injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 821–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnes P, Graffi S, Nolte ML, Carlson P, Harrick L. Coping and stress in Canadian family caregivers of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 737–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, High WM, Jr, Hannay HJ, Sherer M. Predictors of psychological health in caregivers of patients with closed head injury. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 235–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Zurilla TJ, Maydeu-Olivares A. Conceptual and methodological issues in problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy 1995; 26: 409–432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Zurilla TJ, Nezu AM. Development and preliminary evaluation of the social problem solving inventory. Psychological Assessment 1990; 2: 156–163
   Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Hennessy JJ, Diller L. Social problem solving and community integration in postacute rehabilitation outpatients with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2003; 48: 137–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott T, Sherwin E, Harkins S, Marmarosh C. Self-appraised problem solving ability, affective states, and psychological distress. Journal of Counselling Psychology 1995; 42: 105–115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugas MJ, Letarte H, Rhéaume J, Freeston MH, Ladouceur R. Worry and problem solving: Evidence of a specific relationship. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1995; 19: 109–120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott T, Godshall F, Herrick S, Witty T, Spruell M. Problem-solving appraisal and psychological adjustment following spinal cord injury. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1991; 15: 387–398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Spellacy FJ. Indicators of long-term family functioning following severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 819–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Gervasio AH, Camplair PS. Primary caregivers’ psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 197–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry M, Boisvert J-M, Simard M, Parent C, Blais M-C. Communication: An important key to meeting the challenges of stepfamilies. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 2004; 42: 85–104
   Google Scholar
• Markman HJ. The longitudinal study of couples’ interaction: Implications for understanding and predicting the development of marital distress. Marital interaction: Analysis and modification, K Hahlweg, NS Jacobson. Guilford Press, New York 1984; 233–261
   Google Scholar
• Markman HJ, Duncan W, Storaasli RD, Howes PW. The prediction and prevention of marital distress: A longitudinal investigation. Understanding major mental disorders: The contribution of family interaction research, K Hahlweg, MJ Goldstein. Family Process Press, New York, NY 1987; 266–289
   Google Scholar
• Markman HJ, Hahlweg K. The prediction and prevention of marital distress: An international perspective. Clinical Psychology Review 1993; 13: 29–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy R. The interactional perspective of pain behaviour in marriage. International Journal of Family Therapy 1985; 7: 271–283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk DC, Kerns R, Rosenberg R. Effects of marital interaction on chronic pain and disability. Examining the down side of social support. Rehabilitation Psychology 1992; 37: 259–274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn RT, Allen K, Willer B. Affective symptoms in the chronic stage of traumatic brain injury: A study of married couples. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 135–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadoury M. 1999, Cadre de référence clinique pour l’élaboration de programmes de réadaptation pour la clientèle qui a subi un traumatisme cranio-cérébral - volet adulte. Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec (IRDPQ), Québec, Canada;
   Google Scholar
• Boyd LA, Roach AJ. Interpersonal communication skills differentiating more satisfying from less satisfying marital relationships. Journal of Counselling Psychology 1977; 24: 540–542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke HJ, Wallace KM. Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living 1959; 21: 251–255
   Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Ways of coping questionnaire: Research edition. Consulting Psychologists Press, Paolo Alto, CA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Mishara B. Traduction française du ways of coping checklist. Montréal, Canada (UQAM) 1987
   Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 50: 992–1003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Coping and adaptation. The handbook of behavioral medicine, WD Gentry. Guilford Press, New York 1984; 282–325
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard G, Sabourin S, Lussier Y, Richer C, Wright J. Nature des stratégies d’adaptation au sein des relations conjugales: Présentation d’une version abrégée du Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement 1995; 27: 371–377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Zurilla TJ, Chang EC. The relations between social problem solving and coping. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1995; 5: 547–562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R, Freeston MH. Version abrégée de l’inventaire de résolution de problèmes sociaux. Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive 1996; 6: 59–62
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983; 67: 361–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2002; 52: 69–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savard J, Laberge B, Gauthier JG, Ivers H, Bergeron MG. Evaluating anxiety and depression in HIV-infected patients. Journal of Personality Assessment 1998; 71: 349–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziino C, Ponsford J. Vigilance and fatigue following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 100–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy HJ. Self-representation of general psychological well-being of American adults. Los Angeles, CA 17 October 1978
   Google Scholar
• Bravo G, Gaulin P, Dubois M-F. Validation d’une échelle de bien-être général auprès d’une population francophone âgée de 50 à 75 ans. Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement 1996; 15: 112–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JEJ, Johnston SA, Davies-Avery A, Brook RH. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the health insurance study. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 1979; 3
   Google Scholar
• Fazio AF. A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being. Scale series 2, Number 73. USA: Department of Health, Education and Welfare 1977
   Google Scholar
• Edwards DW, Yarvis RM, Mueller DP, Zingale HC, Wagman WJ. Test-taking and the stability of adjustment scales: Can we assess patients’ deterioration?. Evaluation Quarterly 1978; 2: 275–291
   Google Scholar
• Monk M. Blood pressure awareness and psychological well-being in the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Clinical Investigation in Medicine 1981; 4: 183–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Sabourin S. 1985, L’intervention auprès du couple: Diagnostic et traitement [Therapeutic intervention with couples: Diagnosis and treatment]. Saint-Damase, Québec: Consultaction;
   Google Scholar
• Julien D, Brault M, Chartrand É, Bégin J. Immediacy behaviours and synchrony in satisfied and dissatisfied couples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 2000; 32: 84–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman HJ, Renick MJ, Floyd FJ, Stanley SM, Clements M. Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4- and 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993; 61: 70–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for measuring the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1976; 38: 15–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman JM, Markman HJ, Notarius CI. The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1977; 39: 466–477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeston MH, Pléchaty M. Reconsiderations of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s?. Psychological Reports 1997; 81: 419–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm WR, Nichols CW, Schectman KL, Grigsby CC. Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports 1983; 53: 567–572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migneault S, Boisvert J-M, Adam J. Validation d’une traduction québécoise de l'Échelle Kansas de la satisfaction conjugale [Master's thesis]. QuébecCanada 2002
   Google Scholar
• White MB, Stahmann RF, Furrow JL. Shorter may be better: A comparison of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test. Family Perspective 1994; 28: 53–66
   Google Scholar
• Crane DR, Middleton KC, Bean RA. Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy 2000; 28: 53–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm WR, Paff-Bergen LA, Hatch RC, Obiorah FC, Copeland JM, Meens LD, Bugaihis MA. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1986; 48: 381–387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover KJ, AP-BL, Russell CS, Schumm WR. The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: A further report. Psychological Reports 1984; 54: 629–630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumm WR, Scanlon ED, Crow CL, Green DN, Buckler DL. Characteristics of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale in a sample of 79 married couples. Psychological Reports 1983; 53: 583–588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell SE, Newell GK, Schumm WR. Test-retest reliability of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychological Reports 1983; 53: 545–546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G, Charvoz L, Cina A, Widmer K. Prevention of marital distress by enhancing the coping skills of couples: 1-year follow-up study. Swiss Journal of Psychology 2001; 60: 3–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman HJ, Floyd F, Stanley S, Jamieson K. A cognitive-behavioral program for the prevention of marital and family distress: Issues in program development and delivery. Marital interaction: Analysis and modification, K Hahlweg, NS Jacobson. Guilford Press, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Renick MJ, Blumberg SL, Markman HJ. The Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program: An empirically based preventive intervention program for couples. Family Relations 1992; 41: 141–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin P, Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R. Inquiétude et résolution de problèmes sociaux: Le rôle de l’attitude négative face au problème. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive 2002; 12: 49–58
   Google Scholar
• Bach LJ, David AS. Self-awareness after acquired and traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2006; 16: 397–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port A, Willmott C, Charlton J. Self-awareness following traumatic brain injury and implications for rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 277–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans CC, Sherer M, Nick TG, Nakase-Richardson R, Yablon SA. Early impaired self-awareness, depression, and subjective well-being following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 488–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson B, Poeschel Barco P, Velozo CA, et al. Awareness and compensation in postacute head injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1989; 4: 46–54
   Google Scholar
• Wells R, Dywan J, Dumas J. Life satisfaction and distress in family caregivers as related to specific behavioural changes after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1105–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Gervasio AH, Camplair PS. Patient correlates of caregivers distress and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 211–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott TR, Shewchuk RM, Richards JS. Caregiver social problem-solving abilities and family member adjustment to recent-onset physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology 1999; 44: 104–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ey S, Compas B, Eppring-Jordan J, Worsham N. Stress responses and psychological adjustment in patients with cancer and their spouses. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1998; 16: 59–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptacek JT, Ptacek JJ, Dodge KL. Coping with breast cancer from the perspectives of husbands and wives. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 1994; 12: 47–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU. Strategies for measuring stress in studies of psychiatric and physical disorders. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists, S Cohen, RC Kessler, LU Gordon. Oxford University Press, London 1995; 3–26
   Google Scholar
• Martell CR, Addis ME, Jacobson NS. Depression in context: Strategies for guided action. W. W. Norton & Company, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Gortner ET, Gollan JK, Dobson KS, Jacobson NS. Cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression: Relapse prevention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998; 66: 377–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Christensen A, Prince SE, Cordova J, Eldridge K. Integrative behavioural couple therapy: An acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68: 351–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar