Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Factor structure and relationship to productivity and supervision needs following severe traumatic brain injury

References

• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual: Revised and expanded. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, Fl 1993
   Google Scholar
• Reitan RM, Wolfson D. A selective and critical review of neuropsychological deficits and the frontal lobes. Neuropsychology Review 1994; 4: 161–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain MA, Snow WG. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as a measure of frontal pathology: A review. Clinical Neuropsychologist 1993; 7: 108–118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Forbes C, Costello A, Coates LM, Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Gilbert SJ, Dumontheil I, Channon S. The case for the development and use of ‘ecologically valid’ measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 194–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry JD, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 284–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry JD, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 621–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demakis GJ. A meta-analytic review of the sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to frontal and lateralized frontal brain damage. Neuropsychology 2003; 17: 255–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Stickle TR, Love JM, Bianchini KJ, Stanford MS. Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A confirmatory factor analytic study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2005; 20: 355–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegner S, Donders J. Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test after traumatic brain injury. Assessment 1999; 6: 179–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Love JM, Sherwin E, Mathias CW, Ramzinski P, Levy J. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in chronic severe traumatic brain injury: Factor structure and performance subgroups. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 29–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Hartley SM, Adams D. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in stroke rehabilitation: Factor structure and relationship to outcome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1999; 14: 497–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Nick TG, Millis SR, Novack TA. Use of the WCST and the WCST-64 in the assessment of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2003; 25: 512–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell MD, Greig TC, Kaplan E, Bryson G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test dimensions in schizophrenia: Factorial, predictive, and divergent validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1997; 19: 933–941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2(7872)81–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resources PA. Computerised Wisconsin Card Sort Task, Version 4 2003
   Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire A comparative examination. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation/Association of Academic Physiatrists 1994; 73: 103–111
   Google Scholar
• Boake C. Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 765–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison TB, Sander AM, Struchen MA, High Jr WM, Roebuck TM, Contant CF, Wefel JS, Novack TA, Sherer M. Relationship between neuropsychological test performance and productivity at 1-year following traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2004; 18: 249–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 75–87
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: A review of the Community Integration Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997; 12: 74–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Deming R. Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: Replication and extension. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995; 10: 41–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ. Using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to detect malingering: An analysis of the specificity of two methods in nonmalingering normal and patient samples. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2002; 24: 48–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 1954; 19: 149–161
   Google Scholar
• Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Cope DN. The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A review. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 649–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsey DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley Publications 2004, Hoboken, NJ 1980
   Google Scholar
• Rutland-Brown W, Langlois JA, Thomas KE, Xi YL. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 544–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd DA, Walden Miller S, Reilly J, Weber S, Wall TL, Heaton RK. Early environmental factors, ethnicity, and adult cognitive test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006; 20: 243–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arango-Lasprilla JC, Rosenthal M, Deluca J, Cifu DX, Hanks R, Komaroff E. Functional outcomes from inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: How do Hispanics fare?. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007; 88: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar