The relationship between clients’ cognitive functioning and the therapeutic working alliance in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation

References

• Lambert MJ, Barley DE. Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome, JC Norcross. Oxford University Press, New York 2002; 17–32
   Google Scholar
• Constantino MJ, Castonguay LG, Schut AJ. The working alliance: A flagship for the “scientist-practitioner” model in psychotherapy. Counseling Based on Process Research: Applying What we know, GS Tryon. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA 2002; 81–131
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy—A metaanalysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1991; 38: 139–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 1979; 16: 252–260
   Google Scholar
• Schönberger M, Humle F, Teasdale TW. The development of the therapeutic working alliance, patients’ awareness and their compliance during the process of brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 445–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Klonoff PS, O’Brien KP, Altman IM, Amin K, Chiapello D. Productivity after neuropsychologically oriented milieu rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1994; 9: 91–102
   Google Scholar
• Klonoff PS, Lamb DG, Henderson SW. Outcomes from milieu-based neurorehabilitation at up to 11 years post-discharge. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 413–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönberger M, Humle F, Zeeman P, Teasdale TW. Working alliance and patient compliance in brain injury rehabilitation and their relation to psychosocial outcome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2006; 16: 298–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieman-Copland S, Dywan J. Achieving rehabilitative gains in anosognosia after TBI. Brain and Cognition 2000; 44: 1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klonoff PS, Lamb DG, Henderson SW, Shepherd J. Outcome assessment after milieu-oriented rehabilitation: New considerations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 684–690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönberger M, Humle F, Teasdale TW. Subjective outcome of brain injury rehabilitation in relation to the therapeutic working alliance, patient compliance and awareness. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1271–1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen AL. Sociological and cultural aspects in postacute neuropsychological rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1998; 13: 79–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Ben-Yishay Y. Psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic interventions in brain injury rehabilitation. Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury. 3rd, M Rosenthal, ER Griffith, JS Kreutzer, D Pentland. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia 1999; 271–283
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Klonoff PS. Psychotherapy and neuropsychological assessment after brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1988; 3: 45–56
   Google Scholar
• Lewis L. Role of psychological factors in disordered awareness. Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury, GP Prigatano, DL Schacter. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991; 223–239
   Google Scholar
• Judd D, Wilson SL. Psychotherapy with brain injury survivors: an investigation of the challenges encountered by clinicians and their modifications to therapeutic practice. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 437–449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Terry DJ. Psychosocial adjustment following closed head injury: A model for understanding individual differences and predicting outcome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1996; 6: 101–132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LW, Lysaker PH. Neurocognitive correlates of therapeutic alliance in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders 2004; 192: 508–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano C, Christensen A-L. The CRBI at the University of Copenhagen: A participant-therapist perspective. International Handbook of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, BP Uzzell, AL Christensen. Kluwer, Dordrecht 2000; 259–271
   Google Scholar
• Christensen A-L, Caetano C. Neuropsychological rehabilitation in the interdisciplinary team: The post- acute stage. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: A Comprehensive Approach, DT Stuss, G Winour, IH Robertson. Cambridge University Press, New York 1999; 188–200
   Google Scholar
• Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM. Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. Psychological Assessment:. A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1989; 1: 207–210
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1989; 36: 223–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickenkamp R. Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test, Test d2. Hogrefe, Göttingen 1981
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio 1981
   Google Scholar
• Christensen A-L. Luria's neuropsykologiske undergelser. Copenhagen, Dansk Psykologisk Forlag 1975; 50
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory Center comprehensive examination for aphasia: Manual of directions. University of Victoria, Neuropsychology Laboratory. 1969
   Google Scholar
• Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH. Manual for Raven's advanced progressive matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford 1998
   Google Scholar
• Berg EA. A simple objective treatment for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology 1948; 39: 15–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant DA, Berg EA. A behavioral analysis of the degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1948; 38: 404–411
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant A, Macdermott N, Neary D. The long-term outcome of head-injury—implications for service planning. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 595–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B. Assessment of severity of head-injury. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1976; 39: 647–655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B. Epidemiology of head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1996; 60: 362–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönberger M, Humle F, Zeeman P, Teasdale TW. Patient compliance in brain injury rehabilitation in relation to awareness and cognitive and physical improvement. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2006; 16: 561–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman SM. The relationship between therapist-client modality similarity and psychotherapy outcome. Journal of Psychotherapy Practical Research 1998; 7: 56–64
   Google Scholar
• Christensen AL, Caetano C. Alexandr Romanovich Luria (1902–1977): Contributions to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1996; 6: 279–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar