Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in community-based brain injury rehabilitation

References

• Sloan S, Winkler D, Callaway L. Community integration following severe traumatic brain injury: Outcomes and best practice. Brain Impairment 2004; 5: 12–29
   Google Scholar
• Willer B, Corrigan JD. Whatever it takes: A model for community-based services. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 647–659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 73: 103–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming JM, Strong J, Ashton R, Hassell M. A 1-year longitudinal study of severe traumatic brain injury in Australia using the sickness impact profile. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997; 12: 27–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 841–848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams WH, Evans JJ, Wilson BA. Outcome measures for survivors of acquired brain injury in day and outpatient neurorehabilitation programmes. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1999; 9: 421–436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Lezak MD. Manual for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4). Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland 2003
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Hodgkinson A, Veerabangsa A, Maggiotto S. Measuring psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of a new scale. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1999; 14: 543–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell JH, Beckers K, Greenwood RJ. Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument—the BICRO-39 scales. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 1213–1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A randomised control trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2002; 72: 193–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock NP. Client-centered assessment. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 47: 298–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal 1968; 4: 443–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed. CAOT Publications, Ottawa, ON 1998
   Google Scholar
• Malec JF. Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1999; 9: 253–275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A. Introduction and overview. Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, TJ Kiresuk, A Smith, JE Cardillo. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ 1994; 1–37
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Cusick A. Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1990; 44: 519–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT). Guidelines for client-centred practice of occupational therapy. CAOT Publications ACE, Toronto, ON 1991
   Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Davis EA. Achievement of self-identified goals by adults with traumatic brain injury: Phase I. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998; 52: 810–818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Trexel C, Burnett-Smith SE. Occupational therapy and achievement of self-identified goals by adults with acquired brain injury: Phase II. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2002; 56: 489–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodium C. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62: 123–126
   Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson A, Marcussen J, Henriksson C. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002; 34: 5–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cup EHC, Scholte op Reimer WJM, Thijssen MCE, van Kuyk-Minis MAH. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 402–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth TL, McFarland K, Young RMcD. Self-awareness and psychosocial functioning following acquired brain injury: An evaluation of a group support programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2000; 10: 465–484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, McFarland K. Investigation and psychological and neuropsychological factors associated with clinical outcome following a group rehabilitation programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 535–562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Law M, Baptiste S, Pollock N, Carswell A, Polatajko HJ. Targeted applications of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2005; 72: 298–300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1995; 62: 242–249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godfrey H, Partridge F, Knight RG, Bishara S. Course of insight disorder and emotional dysfunction following closed head injury: A controlled cross sectional follow-up study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1993; 15: 503–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth TL, McFarland K, Young RMcD. The investigation of factors underlying deficits in self-awareness and self-regulation. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 291–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001; 82: 367–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Fleming J, Strong J, Radel M, Chan W, Clare L. Awareness typologies, long-term emotional adjustment and psychosocial outcomes following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2007; 17: 129–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Fleming J, Shum D, Kuipers P, Strong J. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) for facilitating goal attainment and improving psychosocial function following acquired brain injury: Comparison of three intervention formats. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000; 67: 22–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, Roueche JR, Pepping M, Wood BC. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1986
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Altman IM, O’Brien KP. Behavioural limitations that traumatic-brain-injured patients tend to underestimate. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1990; 4: 163–176
   Google Scholar
• Snaith RP, Zigmond AS. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Manual. NFER-Nelson, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Babin PR. Diagnosing depression in persons with brain injures: A look at theories, the DSM-IV and depression measures. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 889–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb PA. The Independent Living Scales manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1996
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 2001
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg RP, Constantino MJ, Bruce N. Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome?. Clinical Psychology Review 2006; 26: 657–678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grencavage LM, Norcross JC. Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1990; 21: 372–378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Strong J, Ashton R. Self-awareness of deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: How best to measure?. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainotti G. Emotional and psychosocial problems after brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1993; 3: 259–277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Strong J. A longitudinal study of self-awareness: Functional deficits underestimated by person with brain injury. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1999; 19: 3–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Fleming JM, Hardwick S. Symptom reporting and associations with compensation status, self-awareness, causal attributions, and emotional wellbeing following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 95–106
   Google Scholar
• Perdices M. How do you know whether your patient is getting better (or worse)? A user's guide. Brain Impairment 2005; 6: 219–226
   Google Scholar
• Lustig DC, Strauser DR, Weems GH, Donnell CM, Smith LD. Traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation outcomes: Does the working alliance make a difference?. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling 2003; 34: 30–37
   Google Scholar