Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: A community-based trial

References

• Masson F. Prevalence of impairments 5 years after a head injury, and their relationship with disabilities and outcome. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 487–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Tooth L. Patterns of community integration 2-5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 747–762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. Guilford, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Cifu DX, Keysermarcus L, Lopez E, et al. Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 125–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conboy TJ, Barth J, Boll TJ. Treatment and rehabilitation of mild and moderate head trauma. Rehabilitation Psychology 1986; 31: 203–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollaher K, High W, Sherer M, et al. Prediction of employment outcome one to three years following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Injury 1998; 12: 255–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10–20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 189–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal M, et al. A multicenter longitudinal investigation of return to work and community integration following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1996; 11: 70–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baesman B, Baesman N. The visions system. 1999, Available online at: http://www.thevisionssystem.com, accessed 5 September 2006
   Google Scholar
• Chute DL, Bliss ME. ProsthesisWare. Experimental Aging Research 1994; 20: 229–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman MM. The essential steps cognitive orthotic. NeuroRehabilitation 2003; 18: 31–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles GM, Shore M. The effectiveness of an electronic memory aid for a memory-impaired adult of normal intelligence. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1989; 43: 409–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM, George J. Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 147–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM, Boone KA, Park GJ. Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: Follow-up findings. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 187–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson R. The planning and execution assistant and trainer (PEAT). Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997; 45: 101–107
   Google Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML. Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer. Mental Retardation 2002; 40: 358–365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML. Enhancing independent task performance for individuals with mental retardation through use of a handheld self-directed visual and audio prompting system. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities 2002; 37: 209–218
   Google Scholar
• Wright P, Rogers N, Hall C, Wilson B, Evans J, Emslie H, et al. Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomized controlled crossover study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2001; 70: 477–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Malinek V. Evaluation of NeuroPage: A new memory aid. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1997; 63: 113–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Scott H, Evans J, Emslie H. Preliminary report of a NeuroPage service within a health care system. NeuroRehabilitation 2003; 18: 3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade TK, Troy JC. Mobile phones as a new memory aid: A preliminary investigation using case studies. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 305–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch N, Shenton M, Rowan J. A generic, ‘in-house’, alphanumeric paging system for prospective activity impairments after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 725–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Hawkey K, Whyte J. Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A within-subjects trial. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 556–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek MD, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 455–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddelay A. The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test–Extended2nd. Thames Valley Test Co., Bury St. Edmunds 1991
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddelay A, Hiorns R. The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1989; 11: 855–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman P, Dayle R, Hood CA, Rumrell L. Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. NeuroRehabilitation 2003; 18: 57–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailidis A, Barbenel JC, Fernie G. The efficacy of an intelligent cognitive orthosis to facilitate handwashing by persons with moderate to severe dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 135–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar