Community integration questionnaire: Outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury and high support needs compared with multiple matched controls

References

• McColl MA, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P, Shue K, Davies D, Karlovitz T. The definition of community integration: perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury 1998;12:15–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire: a comparative examination. American Journal of Physical Medicine 1994;73:103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of the Community Integration Questionnaire. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997;12:74–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Community integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 1998;4:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ray B, Settersten RA Jr. What’s going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. The Future of Children 2010;( 2010 Spring):19–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordan WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993;6:75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Clark A, Pappadis MR. What is community integration anyway?: defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010;25:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Tooth L. Patterns of community integration 2–5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2001;15:747–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006;21:8–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie L, Wright-St Clair VA, Keogh J, Gray M. Community integration after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical implications of measurement and service provision for older adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014;95:163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenwitz TH, Iyer R. Differences in generation X and generation Y: implications for the organization and marketers. Marketing Management Journal 2009;19:91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn ND. 2007 Age period and cohort effects. In: Ritzer G, editor. Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell Reference Online. Chichester (Eng): Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; [cited 2015 Jan 28]. Available from: http://www.blackwellreference.com
   Google Scholar
• Standard outcome measures [Internet]. 2015. Victoria (Aust): Transport Accident Commission [cited 2015 July 7]. Transport Accident Commission. Available from http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/providers/clinical-resources/outcome-measures.
   Google Scholar
• Statewide Rehabilitation Clinical Network. Acquired brain injury model of rehabiltation for South Australia. In: South Australia Health, editor. South Australia: Government of South Australia; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Sloan S, Callaway L. People under 50 with acquired brain injury living in residential aged care. Brain Impairment 2010;11:299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusick C, Gerhart K, Mellick D. Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000;15:739–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, McKinley K, Ziino C. accommodation outcomes and transitions following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment 2012;13:22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R. Manual for the Care and Needs Scale (CANS). Revised version. 1st ed. Sydney, Australia: Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL. Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: the Care and Needs Scale (CANS). Brain Injury 2004;18:445–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, Migliorini C, Herd N, Willer B. The community integration questionnaire-revised: measurement of electronic social networking and normative data for adults of working age. Melbourne, Australia: Summer Foundation Ltd; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, Migliorini C, Herd N, Willer B. The community integration questionnaire-revised: measurement of electronic networking and normative data for adults of working age. Aust Occup Ther J.
   Google Scholar
• Breslow NE, Day NE, Davis W, International Agency for Research on Cancer. The analysis of case-control studies. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer WHO; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby AS, Robinson MB. Statistical methods in epidemiology. IV. Confounding and the matched pairs odds ratio. Disability & Rehabilitation 2000;22:259–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, Hannay H, Fischer JS. Neuropsychological assessment. New York (NY) Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings P, McKnight B. Analysis of matched cohort data. Stata Journal 2004;4:274–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane Freeman LE, Blair A, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Hoover RN, Hauptmann M. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries: The National Cancer Institute Cohort. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009;101:751–761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Haylock RGE, Phillipson MA, Willcock T, Berridge GLC, Zhang W. Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. British Journal of Cancer 2009;100:206–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieman S. Self-concept. In: Ritzer G, editor. Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2007 [cited 28 Jan 2015]. Available from http://www.blackwellreference.com.
   Google Scholar
• von Lehn D. Interaction. In: Ritzer G, editor. Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2007 [cited 28 Jan 2015]. Available from http://www.blackwellreference.com.
   Google Scholar
• Waldschmidt A. Disability as a social problem. In: Ritzer G, editor. Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2007 [cited 28 Jan 2015]. Available from http://www.blackwellreference.com.
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Kelsey S, Escobar M, Vernich L. Long term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disability & Rehabilitation 2004;26:253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 2001;15:189–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Winkler D, Anson K. Long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2007;8:251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, S, Callaway L, Winkler D, McKinley K, Ziino C, Anson K. The community approach to participation: outcomes following acquired brain injury intervention. Brain Impairment 2009;10:282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleigh A, Farber R, Gillard M. Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: long-term findings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998;52:45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar