Inhibitory control and traumatic brain injury: The association between executive control processes and social communication deficits

References

• Helps Y, Henley G, Harrison JE. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW]. Hospital separations due to traumatic brain injury, Australia 2004–05. [Internet]. Adelaide, Australia: AIHW; 2008. Injury research and statistics series number 45. [cited 22 October 2013] Available from www.aihw.gov.au.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2010;53:365–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bracy C, Snow P. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2007;21:1181–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers C, Garavan H, Bellgrove M. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2009;33:631–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman D, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum; 1986. p 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chan R, Shum D, Toulopoulou T, Chen E. Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2008:23:201–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess P, Shallice T. Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:263–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg JT. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 2000;126:220–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon S, Watts M. Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2003;8:243–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draper K, Ponsford J. Cognitive functioning ten years following traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation. Neuropsychology 2008;22:618–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senathi-Raja D, Ponsford J, Schonberger M. The association of age and time post injury with long-term emotional outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010;25:330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz Fonseca R, Zimmermann N, Cotrena C, Cardoso C, Haag Kristensen C, Grassi-oliveira R. Neuropsychological assessment of executive functions in traumatic brain injury: hot and cold components. Psychology & Neuroscience 2012;5:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Logan G, Cowan W. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 1984;91:295–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoska-DiMarco A, McDonald S, Kelly M, Tate R, Johnstone S. A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011;33:471–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, O’Flaherty C, Snow P. Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology 2000;14:251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico JS. Clinical discourse analysis: a functional approach to language assessment. In: Simon CS, editor. Communication skills and classroom success. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1986. p 165–203.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J. Using the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire to measure perceived social communication ability in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2010;11:171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Gowland A, Randall R, Fisher A, Osborne-Crowley K, Honan C. Cognitive factors underpinning poor expressive communication skills after traumatic brain injury: theory of Mind or poor executive function? Neuropsychology 2014;28:801–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey H, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000;14:433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocka A, Gagnon J. Definition of impulsivity and related terms following traumatic brain injury: a review of the different concepts and measures used to assess impulsivity, disinhibition and other related concepts. Behavioral Sciences 2014;4:352–370.
   Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Beni C, Annoni J, Vuadens P, Van Der Linden M. How inhibition relates to impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2013;19:890–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Hunt C, Henry J, Dimoska-DiMarco A, Bornhofen C. Angry responses to emotional events: the role of impaired control and drive in people with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010;32:855–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Benton A. Neurosensory centre comprehensive examination of aphasia. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: Neuropsychological Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine Z, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2005;53:695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Guise E, Alturki AY, LeBlanc J, Champoux MC, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Desjardins M, Maleki M, Feyz M. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment in persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 2014;21:128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G*Power 3 [Computer Software]. Germany: Heinrich-Heine-Universität; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn L, Lindamer L, Palmer B, Golshan S, Schneiderman L, Jeste D. Improving understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2002;10:142–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong G, Ngai K, Lam S, Wong A, Mok V, Poon W. Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Brain Injury 2013;27:394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlawish J, Car M, Moelter S, Siderowf A, Sullo E, Xie S, Weintraub D. Cognitive impairment and PD patients’ capacity to consent to research. American Academy of Neurology 2013;81:801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer Software]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Struchen M, Pappadis M, Mazzei D, Clark A, Davis L, Sander A. Perceptions of communication abilities for persons with traumatic brain injury: validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Brain Injury 2008;22:940–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo R. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013;7:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquez de la Plata C, Hart T, FM Hammond, AB Frol, Hudak A, CR Harper, TM O’Neil-Pirozzi, Whyte J, Carlile M, Diaz-Arrastia R. Impact of age on long-term recovery from traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008;89:896–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar