Neuropsychological test validity in Veterans presenting with subjective complaints of ‘very severe’ cognitive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury

References

• Belanger HG, Uomoto JM, Vanderploeg RD. The Veterans Health Administration System of Care for mild traumatic brain injury: costs, benefits, and controversies. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2009;24:4–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;358:453–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay T, Harrington JD, Adams R. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993;8:86–87.
   Google Scholar
• McCrea MA. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussion Syndrome: the new evidence base for diagnosis and treatment. New York (NY): Oxford; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schretlen DJ, Shapiro AM. A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning. International Review of Psychiatry 2003;15:341–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieliauskas LA, Drag LL, Spencer RJ. A review of neuropsychology science and practice, volume II. Chapter 2. Long-term outcomes from traumatic brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. p 26–69.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer RJ, Adams KA. Neuropsychology and polytrauma services. In: Bush SS, editor. Neuropsychological practice with Veterans. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2012. p 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Kalmar K. Persistent postconcussion syndrome: the structure of subjective complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995;10:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Wetter SR. Cogniform disorder and Cogniform condition: proposed diagnoses for excessive cognitive symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2007;22:589–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, DiGiulio DV, Perrin S, Bass AE. Symptoms following mild head injury: Expectation as aetiology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1992;55:200–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr JA, Gunstad J. Further exploration of the effect of “diagnosis threat” on cognitive performance in individuals with mild head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005;11:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drag LL, Spencer RJ, Walker, Pangilinan PH, Bieliauskas LA. The contributions of self–reported injury characteristics and psychiatric symptoms to cognitive functioning in OEF/OIF Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2012;18:576–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer RJ, Drag LL, Walker SJ, Bieliauskas LA. Self-reports of cognitive function are not predictive of neuropsychological test performance among returning combat veterans. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2010;47:521–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron-Perrine B, McGuire AP Spencer RJ, Drag LL, Pangilinan PH, Bieliauskas LA. The influence of sleep and mood on cognitive functioning among Veterans being evaluated for mild traumatic brain injury. Military Medicine 2012;177:1293–1301.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR, Conference participants. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. Clinical Neuropsychology 2009;23:1093–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Bush SS, Ruff RM, Troster AI, Barth JT, Koffler SP, Pliskin NH, Reynolds CR, Silver CH. Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity. NAN Policy & Planning Committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2005;20:419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle P. Symptom validity test performance in U.S. Veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI. Applied Neuropsychology 2010;17:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush SS, Morgan JE. Improbable neuropsychological presentations: Assessment, diagnosis, and management. In Bush SS, editor. Neuropsychological practice with veterans. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2012. p 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee GJ. Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios. Clinical Neuropsychology 2008;22:666–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver JM. Effort, exaggeration and malingering after concussion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2012;83:836–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange RT, Pancholi S, Bhagwat A, Anderson-Barnes V, French LM. Influence of poor effort on neuropsychological test performance in U.S. military personnel following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 2012;34:453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen A, Kaemmer B. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath YS Tellegen A. MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form): manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Green P, Allen LM, Astner K. The Word Memory Test: a user’s guide to the oral and computer-administered forms. Durham (NC): Cognisyst; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh TN. The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment 1997;9:260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demakis GJ, Gervais RO, Rohling ML. The effect of failure on cognitive and psychological symptom validity tests in litigants with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Clinical Neuropsychology 2008;22:875–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson NW, Sweet JJ, Berry DTR, Bryant FB, Granacher RP. Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007;13:440–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke SA, Millis SR, Axelrod BN, Hanks RA. Assessing effort: differentiating performance and symptom validity. Clinical Neuropsychology 2013;27:1234–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney KA, Davis JJ, Shepard PH, Herman SM. Utility of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2008;23:777–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Haley PR. Neuropsychological complaint base rates of personal injury claimants. Forensic Reports 1992;5:385–391.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke SA, Axelrod BN, Schutte C. The utility of the Postconcussive Symptom Questionnaire. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2010;25:634–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle P, Gervais RO, Green P. Memory complaints inventory and symptom validity test performance in a clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;27:725–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutte C, Axelrod BN. Use of embedded cognitive symptom validity measures. Mild traumatic brain injury cases. In: Carone DA, Bush SS, editors. Mild traumatic brain injury: symptom validity assessment and malingering. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2012. p 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Suhr JA, Barrash J. Performance on standard attention, memory, and psychomotor speed tasks as indicators of malingering. In: Larrabee GL, editor. Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p 131–170.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 4th ed. San Antonio (TX): Pearson; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod BN, Fichtenberg NL, Millis SR, Wertheimer JC. Detecting incomplete effort with digit span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. Clinical Neuropsychology 2006;20:513–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JC, Sawyer RJ, Roper BL, Baughman BC. Expansion and re-examination of Digit Span effort indices on the WAIS-IV. Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;26:147–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer RJ, Axelrod BN, Drag LL, Waldron-Perrine B, Pangilinan PH, Bieliauskas LA. WAIS-IV reliable digit span is no more accurate than scaled score as an indicator of invalid performance in a veteran sample undergoing evaluation for mTBI. Clinical Neuropsychology 2013;27:1362–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle P, Gervais RO, Green P. Memory Complaints Inventory results as a function of symptom validity performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2012;27:101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P, Rohling ML, Lees-Haley PR, Allen LM. Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury 2001;15:1045–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Friedel R, Mehren G, Merten T. Malingering and uncooperativeness in psychiatric and psychological assessment: prevalence and effects in a German sample of claimants. Psychiatry Research 2008;157:191–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulemeijer M, Andriessen TMJC, Brauer JMP, Vos PE, van der Werf S. Cognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury: the impact of poor effort on test results and its relation to distress, personality, and litigation. Brain Injury 2008;3:309–318.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais RO, Rohling ML, Green P, Ford W. A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004;19:475–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar