Systematic behavioural observation of executive performance after brain injury

References

• Wilson BA. The ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment after severe brain injury. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, editors. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996. p 413–429.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans J, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1998;4(6):547–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Temkin N, Machamer J, Dikmen S. The ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment and the role of depressive symptoms in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007;13(3):377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchester D, Priestley N, Jackson H. The assessment of executive functions: Coming out of the office. Brain Inj 2004;18(11):1067–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Guidelines Group. Traumatic brain injury: Diagnosis, acute management and rehabilitation. Wellington (New Zealand): ACC; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Reed GM, Lux JB, Bufka LF, Trask C, Peterson DB, Stark S, Threats TT, Jacobson JW, Hawley JA. Operationalizing the international classification of functioning, disability and health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50(2):122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Burr R. Improving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2006;21(3):217–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskin KM, Jackson M, Crowe SF. Can neuropsychological assessment predict capacity to manage personal finances? A comparison between brain impaired individuals with and without administrators. Psychiatry Psychol Law 2005;12(1):56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Lamberts KF, Evans JJ, Spikman JM. A real-life, ecologically valid test of executive functioning: The executive secretarial task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2010;32(1):56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell M, Miller LS. Prediction of functional status in older adults: The ecological validity of four Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System tests. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008;30(6):683–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odhuba RA, Broek M, Johns L. Ecological validity of measures of executive functioning. Br J Clin Psychol 2005;44(2):269–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ready RE, Stierman L, Paulsen JS. Ecological validity of neuropsychological and personality measures of executive functions. Clin Neuropsychol 2001;15(3):314–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semkovska M, Bédard M-A, Godbout L, Limoge F, Stip E. Assessment of executive dysfunction during activities of daily living in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Res 2004;69(2):289–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Elst W, Van Boxtel MP, Van Breukelen GJ, Jolles J. A large-scale cross-sectional and longitudinal study into the ecological validity of neuropsychological test measures in neurologically intact people. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008;23(7):787–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Liossi C. The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2006;21(5):429–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Babbage DR, Leathem JM. Assessing executive performance during cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011;21(2):145–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin LA, Burton LA, Barr WB. Utilization rates of ecologically oriented instruments among clinical neuropsychologists. Clin Neuropsychol 2007;21(5):727–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale TW, Christensen A-L, Willmes K, Deloche G, Braga L, Stachowiak F, Vendrell JM, Castro-Caldas A, Laaksonen RK, Leclercq M. Subjective experience in brain injured patients and their close relatives: A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. Brain Inj 1997;11(8):543–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Wilson B, Evans J, Emslie H. The dysexecutive questionnaire. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Edmunds (UK): Thames Valley Test Company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Kenealy LE. Assessment of behavioral aspects of executive function. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2008. p. 179–202.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd TM, Sautter SW. Route‐finding: A measure of everyday executive functioning in the head‐injured adult. Appl Cognit Psychol 1993;7(2):171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight C, Alderman N, Burgess PW. Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2002;12(3):231–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JC, Woods SP, Vigil O, Heaton RK, Schweinsburg BC, Ellis RJ, Grant I, Marcotte TD. A neuropsychological investigation of multitasking in HIV infection: Implications for everyday functioning. Neuropsychology 2011;25(4):511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevignard MP, Taillefer C, Picq C, Poncet F, Noulhiane M, Pradat-Diehl P. Ecological assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome using execution of a cooking task. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18(4):461–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Edmunds (UK): Thames Valley Test Company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills. Vol. 2: User Manual. Fort Collins (CA): Three Star Press; 2001b.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills. Vol. I: Development, standardization, and administration manual. Fort Collins (CA): Three Star Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Neistadt ME. A meal preparation treatment protocol for adults with brain injury. Am J Occup Ther 1994;48(5):431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum C, Edwards DF. Cognitive performance in senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: The kitchen task assessment. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47(5):431–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MF, Segal M, Veramonti T, Ferraro M, Buxbaum LJ. The naturalistic action test: A standardised assessment for everyday action impairment. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2002;12(4):311–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novakovic-Agopian T, Chen AJ, Rome S, Rossi A, Abrams G, D’Esposito M, Turner G, McKim R, Muir J, Hills N and others. Assessment of subcomponents of executive functioning in ecologically valid settings: the goal processing scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014;29(2):136–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh S, Feinstein A. Cognitive changes. In: Silver JM, McAllister TW, Yudofsky SC, editors. Textbook of traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2011. p. 279–294.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy P, Cohen R, Jenkins M. Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. In: Snyder PJ, Nussbaum PD, editors. Clinical neuropsychology: A pocket handbook for assessment Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1998. p. 573–590.
   Google Scholar
• Morse P, Montgomery C. Neuropsychological evaluation of traumatic brain injury. In: White RF, editor. Clinical syndromes in adult neuropsychology: The practitioner’s handbook. New York (NY): Elsevier Science; 1992. P. 85–176.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Boone KB, Pontón MO, Gorsuch RL, González JJ, Miller BL. Factor analysis of four measures of prefrontal lobe functioning. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998;13(7):585–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch RM, McBride A, Curtiss G, Vanderploeg RD. The components of executive functioning in traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2005;27(8):1022–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen H, Teasdale T, Pinner M. Subjective experience in patients with brain injury and their close relatives before and after a rehabilitation programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14(5):495–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford J, Curran C. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Inj 1996;10(11):841–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Baguena N, Thomas-Anterion C, Sciessere K, Truche A, Extier C, Guyot E, Paris N. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006 Jun;49(5):234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Chevignard MP, Pillon B, Pradat-Diehl P, Taillefer C, Rousseau S, Le Bras C, Dubois B. An ecological approach to planning dysfunction: script execution. Cortex 2000;36(5):649–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevignard MP, Servant V, Mariller A, Abada G, Pradat-Diehl P, Laurent-Vannier A. Assessment of executive functioning in children after TBI with a naturalistic open-ended task: a pilot study. Dev Neurorehabil 2009;12(2):76–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa‐Gonzalez B. Multicontextual occupational therapy intervention: A case study of traumatic brain injury. Occup Ther Int 2001;8(1):49–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naglirei J, Graham J. Handbook of psychology, assessment psychology. John Wiley and Sons; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Birkimer JC, Brown JH. Back to basics: Percentage agreement measures are adequate, but there are easier ways. J Appl Behav Anal 1979;12(4):535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Haneline MT. Evidence-based chiropractic practice. Burlington (MA):Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Quinsey K, Findlay C, Willmott L. FIM information and procedures manual. Wollongong (Australia): Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, University of Wollongong; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Poncet F, Swaine B, Taillefer C, Lamoureux J, Pradat-Diehl P, Chevignard M. Reliability of the Cooking Task in adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2015;25(2):298–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbage DR. Open and abundant data is the future of rehabilitation and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:795–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annu Rev Psychol 2002;53(1):401–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner DM, Pachana NA. Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: A case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2006;21(4):327–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Alcott D, Francis E, Jenkins K, Fowlie C. Methods of evaluation in a cognitive-behavioural rehabilitation programme for brain injury: The experience of Ticehurst House and Unsted Park Hospitals. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1999;9(3):373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield PW, Moore TM, Gardner A. Traumatic brain injury and olfaction: a systematic review. Front Neurol 2014;5(5).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann D, Zupan B, Babbage DR, Radnovich AJ, Tomita M, Hammond F, Willer B. Affect recognition, empathy, and dysosmia after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93(8):1414–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire BE. Assessing complex executive functions with computerized tests: is that toast burning? Front Behav Neurosci 2014;8:362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josman N, Kizony R, Hof E, Goldenberg K, Weiss PL, Klinger E. Using the virtual action planning-supermarket for evaluating executive functions in people with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovascular Dis 2014;23(5):879–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanguay AN, Davidson PS, Guerrero Nuñez KV, Ferland MB. Cooking breakfast after a brain injury. Front Behav Neurosci 2014;8(272):10.3389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar