Development of an eye-tracking method to assess mental set switching in people with aphasia

References

• Hallowell B. Aphasia and other acquired neurogenic language disorders: A guide for clinical excellence. San Diego, (CA): Plural Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel T, Penn C, Ormond-Brown D. Executive dysfunction as an explanatory basis for conversation symptoms of aphasia: A pilot study. Aphasiology. 2007;21:814–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson J, Nettles C, Davis M, Morrow L, Montgomery A. Functional communication and executive function in aphasia. Clin Linguist Phonet. 2006;20:401–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn C, Frankel T, Watermeyer J, Russell N. Executive function and conversational strategies in bilingual aphasia. Aphasiology. 2010;24:288–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy M. Executive function ability in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2002;16:549–57.
   Google Scholar
• Keil K, Kaszniak AW. Examining executive function in individuals with brain injury: A review. Aphasiology. 2002;16:305–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy M. Executive functions: theory, assessment, and treatment. In: Kimbarow ML, editor. Cognitive communication disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc ; 2011p. 77–118.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull. 1997;121:65–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann N, Gvion A. Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: A dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation. Brain Lang. 2003;86:23–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Neuropsychological testing. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Meiran N. Task switching: Mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self-control. In Hassin RR, Ochsner KN, Trope Y, editors. Self control in society, mind, and brain. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 202–20.
   Google Scholar
• Monsell S. Control of mental processes. In: Bruce V, editor. Unsolved mysteries of the mind: tutorial essays in cognition. Psychology Press; 1996. p. 93–148.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘Frontal Lobe’ tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41:49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL. Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: Presence and relation to language and communication measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012:S51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frattali CM, Thompson CM, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM. ASHA functional assessment of communication skills (FACS). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson I, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention: TEA. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Emerson MJ, Padilla F, Ahn, JC. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychol. 2004;115:123–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan D, Waters GS. Aphasic disorders of syntactic comprehension and working memory capacity. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1995;12:637–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspari I, Parkinson SR, LaPointe LL, Katz, RC. Working memory and aphasia. Brain Cogn. 1998;37:205–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova MV, Hallowell B. Validity of an eye-tracking method to index working memory in people with and without aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26:556–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognition and aphasia: A discussion and a study. J Commun Disord. 2002;35:171–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer S, Hallowell, B. A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm. J Commun Disord. 2015;55:15–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula WD, McNeil MR. Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2008;29:169–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurland J. The role that attention plays in language processing. SIG 2 Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogen Speech Lang Disord. 2011;21:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe LL, Erickson RJ. Auditory vigilance during divided task attention in aphasic individuals. Aphasiology. 1991;5:511–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil MR, Doyle P, Hula W, Rubinsky H, Fossett T, Matthews C. Using resource allocation theory and dual-task methods to increase the sensitivity of assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2004;18:521–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil MR, Matthews CT, Hula WD, Doyle PJ, Rubinsky HJ, Fossett, TRD. A dual-task tool for quantifying normal comprehension of aphasic connected speech production: A constructive replication. Aphasiology. 2005;19:473–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray LL. Attention deficits in aphasia: Presence, nature, assessment, and treatment. Semin Speech Lang. 2002;23:107–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray LL, Holland AL, Beeson PM. Grammaticality judgements of mildly aphasic individuals under dual-task conditions. Aphasiology. 1997;11:993–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin DA, Rizzo M. The effect of focal cerebral lesions on intramodal and cross-modal orienting of attention. Clin Aphasiol. 1989;18:61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng CH, McNeil MR, Milenkovic P. An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia. Brain Lang. 1993;45:276–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant DA, Berg, EA. Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST). Psychological Assessment Resources.; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds CR. Comprehensive trail making test (CTMT). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995;124:207–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001;27:763–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport DA, Styles EA, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umiltà C, Moscovitch M, editors. Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1994 p. 421–52.
   Google Scholar
• Logan GD, Schneider DW. Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006;32:347–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabria M, Hernández M, Branzi FM, Costa A. Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: evidence from task-switching. Front Psychol. 2012;2:399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier N, Blaye A, Dufau S, Lucenet J. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development. Dev Psychol. 2010;46:955–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragg L, Nation K. Shifting development in mid-childhood: The influence of between-task interference. Dev Psychol. 2009;45:1465–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellefson MR, Shapiro LR, Chater N. Asymmetrical switch costs in children. Cogn Dev. 2006;2:108–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch I, Gade M, Schuch S, Philipp AM. The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonom Bull Rev. 2010;17:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin CD, Barcelo F, Hernandez M, Costa A. The time course of the asymmetrical ‘local’ switch cost: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol. 2011;86:210–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson MJ, Miyake A. The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. J Mem Lang. 2003;48:148–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray J, Lindenberger U. Adult age differences in task switching. Psychol Aging. 2000;15:126–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior A, MacWhinney B. A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingual Lang Cogn. 2010;13:253–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok E, Martin MM. Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Dev Sci. 2004;7:325–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray J. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults. Brain Res. 2006;1105:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray J, Li KZH, Lindenberger U. age-related changes in task-switching components: The role of task uncertainty. Brain Cogn. 2002;49:363–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr U. Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychol Aging. 2001;16:96–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers S, Maylor EA. Task switching across the life span: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Dev Psychol. 2005;41:661–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou HS, Kennedy MRT. Switching in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23:1065–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff MJ, Balota DA, Minear M, Aschenbrenner AJ, Duchek JM. Dissociative global and local task-switching costs across younger adults, middle-aged adults, older adults, and very mild Alzheimer’s disease individuals. Psychol Aging. 2015;30:727–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse CS, Balota DA, Yap MJ, Duchek JM, McCabe DP. Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology. 2010;24:300–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie G, Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of ‘switch costs.’ Psychol Res. 2000;63:212–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski AT. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002;34:455–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallowell B, Wertz RT, Kruse H. Using eye movement responses to index auditory comprehension: An adaptation of the revised token test. Aphasiology. 2002;16:587–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner K, Sereno SC, Morris RK, Schmauder AR, Clifton Jr C. Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Lang Cogn Process. 1989;4:SI21–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odekar A, Hallowell B, Kruse H, Moates D, Lee C. Validity of eye movement methods and indices for capturing semantic (associative) priming effects. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52:31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho S, Thompson CK. What goes wrong during passive sentence production in agrammatic aphasia: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology. 2010;24:1576–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy JJ, Thompson CK. Binding in agrammatic aphasia: Processing to comprehension. Aphasiology. 2010;24:551–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey MW, Choy JJ, Thompson, CK. Real-time comprehension of wh-movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain Lang. 2007;100:1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Thompson CK. Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers. Lang Cogn Process. 2011a;26:985–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Thompson CK. Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology. 2011b; 25:813–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CK, Dickey MW, Choy JJ. Complexity in the comprehension of wh-movement structures in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Brain Lang. 2004;91:124–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CK, Dickey MW, Cho S, Lee J, Griffin Z. Verb argument structure encoding during sentence production in agrammatic aphasic speakers: An eye-tracking study. Brain Lang. 2007;103:24–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RM. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cogn Psychol. 1974;6:84–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus MK, Magnuson JS, Dahan D, Chambers C. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. J Psycholinguist Res. 2000;29:557–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus M, Spivey-Knowlton M, Eberhard K, Sedivy J. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 1995;268:1632–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig F, McQueen JM. The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. J Mem Lang. 2007;57:460–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman D, Yee E, Blumstein SE, Magnuson JS. Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain Lang. 2011;117:53–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee E, Blumstein SE, Sedivy JC. Lexical-semantic activation in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;20:592–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee E, Sedivy JC. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006;32:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova MV, Hallowell B. A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia. J Commun Disord. 2014;52:78–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggoner T. Color vision testing made easy. Orlando, FL: Vision Associates; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Joos M, Weber S. NYAN [Professional Edition software]. Dresden: Interactive Minds; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• LC Technologies. Superior eye tracking technology. Fairfax, VA: LC Technologies; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Manor BR, Gordon E. Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. J Neurosci Methods. 2003;128:85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr U, Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003;29:362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar