Social communication assessment after traumatic brain injury: a narrative review of innovations in pragmatic and discourse assessment methods

References

• MacDonald S, Wiseman-Hakes C. Knowledge translation in ABI rehabilitation: a model for consolidating and applying the evidence for cognitive-communication interventions. Brain Inj. 2010;24(3):486–508. doi:10.3109/02699050903518118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PonsfordJ, DowningM, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, Spitz G. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at 2, 5, and 10-years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek P, Turkstra LS. Job stability in skilled work and communication ability after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation: an International, Multidisciplinary Journal. 2016;38(5):452–61. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1044621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Return to work and social communication ability following severe traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016;59(3):511–20. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Simpson G, Togher L, Power E, Gillett L. An exploratory prospective study of the association between communication skills and employment outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(7/8):812–18. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.775491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS. Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Semin Speech Lang. 2005;26(4):223–41. doi:10.1055/s-2005-922102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2018 22/05/2018. ASHA online Evidence Map: traumatic brain injury. <https://www.asha.org/MapLanding.aspx?id=8589947062>. 22/05/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS. Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Semin Speech Lang. 2005;26(4):223–1. doi:10.1055/s-2005-922102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turkstra LS, Coelho C, Ylvisaker M. The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Semin Speech Lang. 2005;26(4):215–1. doi:10.1055/s-2005-922101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Resource manual for commissioning and planning services for speech language and communication needs (SLCN): brain injury. UK: Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (RCSLT); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario (CASLPO). Preferred practice guideline for cognitive-communication disorders. Ontario: CASLPO; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J, Stergiou-Kita M, Ponsford J, Teasell R, Bayley M, Turkstra LS. INCOG Recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, Part IV: cognitive communication. TheJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2014;29(4):353–68. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel J, Ferguson A, Spencer E, Togher L. Speech-language pathologists’ perspectives on cognitive communication assessment during post-traumatic amnesia. Brain Inj. 2016;30(9):1131–42. doi:10.1080/02699052.2016.1174785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald S. Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017; 31 (13–14): 1760–80. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1379613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MR, DeRuyter F. Cognitive and language bases for communication disorders. In: Beukelman DR, Yorkston KM, editors. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury: management of cognitive, language and motor impairments. Austin: Pro-Ed; 1991. p. 124–90.
   Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins MR. Terminology and methodology in the assessment of cognitive–linguistic disorders. Brain Impairment. 2006;7(3):212–22. doi:10.1375/brim.7.3.212.
   Google Scholar
• Steel J, Ferguson A, Spencer E, Togher L. Language and cognitive communication disorder during post-traumatic amnesia: profiles of recovery after TBI from three cases. Brain Inj. 2017b;31(13–14):1889–902. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1373200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith M, Togher L, Ferguson A, Levick W, Docking K. Assessment practices of speech-language pathologists for cognitive communication disorders following traumatic brain injury in adults: an international survey. Brain Inj. 2014;28(13/14):1657–66. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.947619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff MC, Proctor A, Haley K. Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): assessment and treatment procedures used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Brain Inj. 2002;16(9):773–87. doi:10.1080/02699050210128870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel J, Ferguson A, Spencer E, Togher L. Speech pathologists’ current practice with cognitive-communication assessment during post-traumatic amnesia: a survey. Brain Inj. 2013;27(7/8):819–30. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.775492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedeman S, Turkstra L. Knowledge, confidence, and practice patterns of speech-language pathologists working with adults with traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2018;27(1):181–91. doi:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology. 2000;14(3):251–68. doi:10.1080/026870300401469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddy KM, Howell DM, Capilouto GJ. Current practices regarding discourse analysis and treatment following non-aphasic brain injury: a qualitative study. J Interactional Res Commun Disord. 2015;6(2):211–36. doi:10.1558/jircd.v6i2.1905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant L, Spencer E, Ferguson A. Clinical use of linguistic discourse analysis for the assessment of language in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31(10):1105–26. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1239013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerveld MF, Claessen M. Clinician survey of language sampling practices in Australia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(3):242–49. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.871336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong L, Brady M, Mackenzie C, Norrie J. Transcription‐less analysis of aphasic discourse: a clinician’s dream or a possibility? Aphasiology. 2007;21(3–4):355–74. doi:10.1080/02687030600911310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JD, Dalton SG. Main concepts for three different discourse tasks in a large non-clinical sample. Aphasiology. 2016;30(1):45–73. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1057891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Copley A, Cornwell P, Kelly C. Systematic review of behavioral interventions targeting social communication difficulties after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(8):1352–65. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM. Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: towards an understanding. Brain Inj. 2000;14(5):397–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: reliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Journal Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2007;22(1):31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: progress, caveats, and needs. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28(2):122–28. doi:10.1055/s-2007-970570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbourn E, Togher L, Kenny B, Power E. Strengthening the quality of longitudinal research into cognitive-communication recovery after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(1):1-16. doi:10.1080/17549507.2016.1193896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossatz HE, Schüßler I. So ein dackel!. In: Ingrid Schüßler, Rosemary Tzschoppe, editors: Bildergeschichten für den Sprachunterricht. Vol. 22. Munich: Tomus Verlag; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen M, Togher L. Narrative after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Inj. 2009;23(9):727–40. doi:10.1080/02699050903133954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM, Ponsford JL. Narrative discourse following severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal follow-up. Aphasiology. 1999;13(7):529–51. doi:10.1080/026870399401993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis GA, Coelho CA. Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain Lang. 2004;89(3):508–23. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galetto V, Andreetta S, Zettin M, Marini A. Patterns of impairment of narrative language in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurolinguistics. 2013;26(6):649–61. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini A, Zettin M, Galetto V. Cognitive correlates of narrative impairment in moderate traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia. 2014;64:282–88. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. J Speech, Lang Hearing Res. 2002;45(6):1232–48. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse KM, Coelho CA. Working memory and discourse production abilities following closed-head injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19(12):1001–09. doi:10.1080/02699050500109951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro MS, Coelho CA. Treatment of story grammar following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2002;16(12):1065–73. doi:10.1080/02699050210155230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas L, Brookshire R. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(2):338–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett J. Old McDonald had an apartment house. New York, NY: Atheneum; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Le K, Coelho C, Mozeiko J, Grafman J. Measuring goodness of story narratives. J Speech, Lang Hearing Res. 2011a;54:118–26. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andelic N. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(1):28–29. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70294-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Cornwell P, Copley A, Doig E, Fleming J. Remediation of social communication impairments following traumatic brain injury using metacognitive strategy intervention: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2017; 31 (13–14): 1830–39. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1346284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Rietdijk R, Power E. The effectiveness of social communication partner training for adults with severe chronic TBI and their families using a measure of perceived communication ability. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38(3):243–55. doi:10.3233/NRE-151316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcara G, Bambini V. A test for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS): normative data and psychometric properties. Front Psychol. 2016;7:70. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeleri R, Bosco F, Zettin M, Sacco K, Colle L, Bara B. Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: a complete pragmatic assessment. Brain Lang. 2008;107(3):229–45. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linscott R, Knight R, Godfrey H. The Profile of Functional Impairment in Communication (PFIC): a measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Inj. 1996;10(6):397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honan CA, McDonald S, Tate R, Ownsworth T, Togher L, Fleming J, Anderson V, Morgan A, Catroppa C, Douglas J, et al. Outcome instruments in moderate-to-severe adult traumatic brain injury: recommendations for use in psychosocial research. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2017;1–21. doi:10.1080/09602011.2017.1339616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Coelho C, Kennedy M, Sohlberg MM, Avery J, Yorkston K. Practice guidelines for standardized assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2005;13(2):ix–xxviii.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmo WJ, Graser J, Krchnavek B, Hauck K, Calabrese D. Measure of Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities (MCLA). Vero Beach, Fla.: The Speech Bin; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Palmer S, Dann S, Togher L. Review of the literature on the use of social media by people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(17):1511–21. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1045992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Togher L, Palmer S. Technology and its role in rehabilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Inj. 2017;31(8):1028–1043 doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1292429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, Matsuzawa Y, Lebowitz M. Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1155–62. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.613086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Dann S, Togher L, Palmer S. Hashtag #TBI: a content and network data analysis of tweets about Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(1):49–63. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1403047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilov AM, Togher L, Power E, Turkstra L. Can teenagers with traumatic brain injury use Internet chatrooms? A systematic review of the literature and the Internet. Brain Inj. 2010;24(10):1135–72. doi:10.3109/02699052.2010.490511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B, Fromm D, Rose Y, Bernstein Ratner N. Fostering human rights through talkbank. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(1):115-119 doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1392609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins MR. Ecological validity in assessment of discourse in traumatic brain injury: ratings by clinicians and non-clinicians. Brain Inj. 1998;12(11):963–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart E, Togher L, Power E, Docking K. Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Inj. 2012;26(3):221–33. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.648711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Grela B, Corso M, Gamble A, Feinn R. Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19(13):1139–45. doi:10.1080/02699050500110678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff MC, Hengst JA, Tranel D, Cohen NJ. Hippocampal amnesia disrupts verbal play and the creative use of language in social interaction. Aphasiology. 2009;27(7–8):926–39. doi:10.1080/02687030802533748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CA, Turkstra LS. Selling the story: narratives and charisma in adults with TBI. Brain Inj. 2011;25(9):844–57. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.585507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek P, Togher L, Turkstra L. Functional workplace communication elicitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. In: Hough M, editor. Tucson (AZ).: University of Pittsburgh. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 1997;11(10):947–67. doi:10.1080/02687039708249421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Griffiths GG, Fickas S. An evaluation of reading comprehension of expository text in adults with traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2014;23(2):160–75. doi:10.1044/2013_AJSLP-12-0005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Inj. 1997;11(3):169–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra LS, Quinn-Padron M, Johnson JE, Workinger MS, Antoniotti N. In-person versus telehealth assessment of discourse ability in adults with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(6):424–32. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e31823346fc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse KM, Gathof M, Fields RD, Lobianco TF, Bush HM, Noffsinger JT. Conversational discourse analysis procedures: a comparison of two paradigms. Aphasiology. 2011;25(1):106–18. doi:10.1080/02687031003714467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramovic P, Kenny B, Power E, McDonald S, Tate R, Hunt L, MacDonald S, Heard R, Togher L. Exploring the relationship between cognition and functional verbal reasoning in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at six months post injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31(4):502–16. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1280854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaki E, Turkstra L. Communication abilities and work re-entry following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2000;14(5):441–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs E, Togher L, Kenny B, Fromm D, Forbes M, MacWhinney B, McDonald S, Tate R, Turkstra L, Power E. Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(2):167–81. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1291989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco FM, Parola A, Angeleri R, Galetto V, Zettin M, Gabbatore I. Improvement of communication skills after traumatic brain injury: the Efficacy of the cognitive pragmatic treatment program using the communicative activities of daily living. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018:acy041–acy041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braden C, Hawley L, Newman J, Morey C, Gerber D, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills group treatment: a feasibility study for persons with traumatic brain injury and comorbid conditions. Brain Inj. 2010;24(11):1298–310. doi:10.3109/02699052.2010.506859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnihotri S, Gray J, Colantonio A, Polatajko H, Cameron D, Wiseman-Hakes C, Rumney P, Keightley M. Arts-based social skills interventions for adolescents with acquired brain injuries: five case reports. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(1):44–63. doi:10.3109/17518423.2013.844739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu LV, Togher L, Power E. The impact of communication partner and discourse task on a person with traumatic brain injury: the use of multiple perspectives. Brain Inj. 2011;25(6):560–80. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.571655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, Power E, Barnes S, Togher L. Questioning in conversations before and after communication partner training for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2015;29(9):1082–109. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1035226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn N, Togher L, Power E, Heard R. Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26(13/14):1702–15. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.722258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco FM, Angeleri R, Zuffranieri M, Bara BG, Sacco K. Assessment Battery for Communication: development of two equivalent forms. J Commun Disord. 2012;45(4):290–303. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel J, Ferguson A, Spencer E, Togher L. Social communication assessment during post-traumatic amnesia and the post-acute period after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017a;31(10):1320–30. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1332385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study. Brain Inj. 1998;12(11):911–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco FM, Angeleri R, Sacco K, Bara BG. Explaining pragmatic performance in traumatic brain injury: a process perspective on communicative errors. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015;50(1):63–83. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le K, Coelho C, Mozeiko J, Krueger F, Grafman J. Measuring goodness of story narratives: implications for traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2011b;25(6/7):748–60. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.539696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injury speakers: theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Inj. 1992;6(3):271–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Togher L. Giving information: the importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2000;14(4):365–90. doi:10.1080/026870300401414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoepner JK, Turkstra LS. Video-based administration of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire for adults with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Brain Inj. 2013;27(4):464–72. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.765600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Champoux M-C, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M. Early conversational discourse abilities following traumatic brain injury: an acute predictive study. Brain Inj. 2014;28(7):951–58. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.888760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Tate R, McDonald S, Rietdijk R. Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology. 2010;24(6–8):914–27. doi:10.1080/02687030903422478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald S. Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES). Guelph, ON: Clinical Publishing; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald S, Johnson CJ. Assessment of subtle cognitive-communication deficits following acquired brain injury: A normative study of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES). Brain Inj. 2005;19(11):895–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette Y, Ska B, Côté H. Protocole Montréal d’Évaluation de la Communication. Isbergues: France Ortho Édition; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Champoux M-C, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M. Acute evaluation of conversational discourse skills in traumatic brain injury. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(6):582–93. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.871335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg CA, Cusick CP, Hawley LA, Newman JK, Morey CE, Harrison-Felix CL, Whiteneck GG. Treatment efficacy of social communication skills training after traumatic brain injury: a randomized treatment and deferred treatment controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1561–73. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico JS. Clinical discourse analysis: a functional approach to language assessment. In: Simon CS, editor. Communication skills and classroom success: assessment of language-learning disabled students. San Diego: College-Hill Press; 1985. p.165–204.
   Google Scholar
• Grice HP. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL, editors. Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 1975. p. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick CP, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: three perspectives. Brain Inj. 2006;20(4):425–35. doi:10.1080/02699050600664574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Code C, Grant S. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology. 2004;18(4):313–35. doi:10.1080/02687030344000535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim P, Power E, Togher L. Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: using exchange structure analysis. Brain Inj. 2013;27(6):717–42. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.775485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney TJ, Urbanczyk B. Developing a positive communication culture for rehabilitation: communication training for staff and family members. In: Durgin CJ, Schmidt ND, editors. Staff development and clinical intervention in brain injury rehabilitation. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1993. p. 57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hoepner JK, Olson SE. Joint video self-modeling as a conversational intervention for an individual with traumatic brain injury and his everyday partner: a pilot investigation. Clin Arch Commun Disord. 2018;3(1):22–41. doi:10.21849/cacd.2018.00262.
   Google Scholar
• Davis B, Guendouzi J, Savage M, Blackburn WL, Williams M. Politeness strategies in response to prompted directives in a preliminary English version of the ABaCO Battery. J Interactional Res Commun Disord. 2015;6(2):115–29. doi:10.1558/jircd.v7i1.26755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Delacourt A, Wyrzykowski N, Lefeuvre M. TLC: test Lillois de Communication. Isbergue: Ortho; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Verigneaux C, Kozlowski O. An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(7):922–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02945.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Daveluy W, Kozlowski O. Communication in conversation in stroke patients. J Neurol. 2010;257(7):1099–107. doi:10.1007/s00415-010-5469-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski Moreau O, Blin P, Guillemot M, Daveluy W, Deicas P. Communication, social skills and quality of life after mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison of subjects with or without complaints. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58(Supplement 1):e148.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong EM, Ciccone N, Hersh D, Katzenellebogen J, Coffin J, Thompson S, Flicker L, Hayward C, Woods D, McAllister M. Development of the Aboriginal Communication Assessment After Brain Injury (ACAABI): a screening tool for identifying acquired communication disorders in Aboriginal Australians. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(3):297–308. doi:10.1080/17549507.2017.1290136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong E, Ciccone N, Hersh D, Katzenellenbogen J, Thompson S, Flicker L, Coffin J, Hayward C, Woods D, McAllister M. The nature and piloting of a tool to screen for acquired communication disorders in Aboriginal Australians after brain injury: exploring culturally valid assessment to improve rehabilitation pathways. Aphasiology. 2018;32(sup1):7–8. doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1484878.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald S. Cognitive Communication Checklist for Acquired Brain Injury (CCCABI). Guelph, Ontario: CCD Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Covington N, Duff M. Intact reported speech use in traumatic brain injury: how to think about ‘intact’ performance in the context of heterogeneity. J Interactional Res Commun Disord. 2016;7(1):79–100. doi:10.1558/jircd.v7i1.2192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach RK. Cognitive basis for sentence planning difficulties in discourse after traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2013;22(2):S285–97. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0081).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis C, Peach RK. Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(3):255–66. doi:10.3233/NRE-2009-0476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilov AM, Togher L, Grant S. Problem solving with friends: discourse participation and performance of individuals with and without traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2009;23(5):584–605. doi:10.1080/02687030701855382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Rietdijk R. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impairment. 2009;10(2):188–204. doi:10.1375/brim.10.2.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon RG, Rigon A, Duff MC. Conversational synchrony in the communicative interactions of individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(11):1300–08. doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1042408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Ehlhardt LA, Fickas S, Sutcliffe A. A pilot study exploring electronic (or e-mail) mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Inj. 2003;17(7):609–29. doi:10.1080/0269905031000070189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Power E, Brunner M, Togher L. Reliability of videoconferencing administration of a communication questionnaire to people with traumatic brain injury and their close others. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017;32(6):E38–E44. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B, Fromm D. AphasiaBank as BigData. Semin Speech Lang. 2016;37(1):10–22. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1571357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronach ST, Turkstra LS. Theory of mind and use of cognitive state terms by adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology. 2008;22(10):1054–70. doi:10.1080/02687030701632187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croteau C, McMahon-Morin P, Le Dorze G, Power E, Fortier-Blanc J, Davis GA. Exploration of a quantitative method for measuring behaviors in conversation. Aphasiology. 2018;32(3):247–63. doi:10.1080/02687038.2017.1350629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra LS, Brehm SE, Montgomery EB Jr. Analysing conversational discourse after traumatic brain injury: isn’t it about time?. Brain Impairment. 2006;7(3):234–45. doi:10.1375/brim.7.3.234.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen L. Written discourse and acquired brain impairment: evaluation of structural and semantic features of personal letters from a Systemic Functional Linguistic perspective. Clin Linguist Phon. 2005;19(3):227–47. doi:10.1080/02699200410001698652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengst JA, Duff MC. Clinicians as communication partners: developing a mediated discourse elicitation protocol. Top Lang Disord. 2007;27:37–49. doi:10.1097/00011363-200701000-00005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BM, Proctor A. Written discourse of adolescents with closed head injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16(11):1011–24. doi:10.1080/02699050210147248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse KM, Stout CE, Bosworth KE. Cohesion in discourse of college-educated and non-college-educated adults: implications for young adults with brain injury. Adv Speech Lang Pathol. 2001;3(2):97–107. doi:10.3109/14417040109003717.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Collaborative brain injury intervention: positive everyday routines. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, inc.; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Powell MB. What’s the story? An exploration of narrative language abilities in male juvenile offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law. 2005;11(3):239–53. doi:10.1080/1068316042000209323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant L, Ferguson A, Valentine M, Spencer E. Implementation of discourse analysis in aphasia: investigating the feasibility of a Knowledge-to-Action intervention. Aphasiology. 2018:1–27. doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1454886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild K, Howieson D, Webbe F, Seelye A, Kaye J. The status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review. Alzheimer’s Dementia: Journal Alzheimer’s Association. 2008;4(6):428–37. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen A, Brown J, Beukelman D, Hux K, Myers A. Effect of message type on the visual attention of adults with traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2017;26(2):428–42. doi:10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J, Thiessen A. Using images with individuals with aphasia: current research and clinical trends. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2018;27(1S):504–15. doi:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar